An earlier opinion piece considered the professional issues surrounding the occupational therapist's dress code within the workplace (Davys et al 2006). This second paper considers the role of the occupational therapist when a client's choice of clothing may conflict with social expectations and have a negative impact upon social inclusion. Three hypothetical cases that reflect clinical realities are presented, which serve as prompts for reflection upon informed choice, professional responsibilities and the therapeutic relationship. It is concluded that there needs to be debate about the conflict between each of these areas and the concept of social inclusion.
AthertonH (2003) A history of learning disabilities. In: GatesB ed. Learning disabilities: towards inclusion. 4th ed.London: Churchill Livingstone, 41–60.
2.
BakerHUusKBamfordJMarteauTM (2004) Increasing knowledge about a screening test: preliminary evaluation of structured, chart-based, screener presentation. Patient Education and Counseling, 52, 55–59.
3.
Cabinet Office (2006) Reaching out: an action plan on social exclusion. London: HMSO.
4.
College of Occupational Therapists (2005) College of Occupational Therapists: Code of ethics and professional conduct for occupational therapists. London: COT.
5.
DavysDPopeKTaylorJ (2006) Professionalism, prejudice and personal taste: does it matter what we wear?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69 (7), 339–41.
6.
Department for Work and Pensions (2006) Working together: UK national action plan on social inclusion 2006–8. London: Stationery Office.
7.
Department of Health (2001) Valuing people: a new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London: Stationery Office.
8.
GodolphinW (2003) The role of risk communication in shared decision making. British Medical Journal, 327, 692–93.
9.
KuhnL (2002) Beyond informed choice: infant feeding dilemmas for women in low-resource communities of high HIV prevalence. Social Dynamics, 28, 1132–54.
10.
SumsionT (2006) Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: a guide to implementation. London: Churchill Livingstone.
11.
WolfensbergerW (1995) The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
12.
YoungACarrGHuntRMcCrackenWSkippATattersallH (2006) Informed choice and deaf children: underpinning concepts and enduring challenges. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11 (3), 322–36.
