This report presents the findings of a literature-based project with the aim of exploring the ways of knowing employed within occupational therapy. The study explored knowledge generated from the positivist and naturalistic paradigms and considered the appropriateness for occupational therapy. It sought to highlight ways of knowing that included more than just ‘scientific’ research evidence and explored theoretical understandings and personal and experiential knowing. The findings suggest that a practical artistry approach has a particular significance in day-to-day practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BennerP (1984) From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
BrechinASidellM (2000) Ways of knowing. In: GommRDaviesC, eds. Using evidence in health and social care. London: Sage/The Open University.
4.
CarperBA (1978) Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), 13–23.
5.
CheekJ (1996) Taking a view: qualitative research as representation. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 492–505.
6.
CloseJEllisMHooperRGlucksmanEJacksonSSwiftC (1999) Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 353, 93–97.
7.
College of Occupational Therapists (2005) College of Occupational Therapists: Code of ethics and professional conduct. London: COT.
8.
CreekJ (1997) … the truth is no longer out there. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(2), 50–52.
9.
CreekJ (2003) Occupational therapy defined as a complex intervention. London: College of Occupational Therapists.
10.
de CossartLFishD (2005) Cultivating a thinking surgeon: new perspectives on clinical teaching, learning and assessment. Shrewsbury: tfm publishing.
11.
Department of Health (1997) The new NHS: modern dependable. (White Paper.) London: Stationery Office.
12.
Department of Health (1998) A first class service: quality in the new NHS. London: DH.
13.
Department of Health (2000) The NHS plan. London: DH.
14.
EdwardsSD (2001) Philosophy of nursing: an introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
EllisLCrookesPA (2002) Philosophical and theoretical underpinnings of research. In: CrookesPADaviesS, eds. Research into practice: essential skills for reading and applying research in nursing and health care. Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall, 85–115.
16.
ErautM (1994) Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.
17.
FinlayL (1997) The practice of psychosocial occupational therapy. 2nd ed.Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
18.
FinlayL (1998a) Reflexivity: an essential component for all research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(10), 453–56.
19.
FinlayL (1998b) The life world of the occupational therapist: meaning and motive in an uncertain world. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) Milton Keynes: The Open University.
20.
FinlayL (2004) The practice of psychosocial occupational therapy. 3rd ed.Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
21.
FishD (1998) Appreciating practice in the caring professions: refocusing professional development and practitioner research. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
22.
GilbertsonLLanghornePWalkerAAllenAMurrayGD (2000) Domiciliary occupational therapy for patients with stroke discharged from hospital: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 320, 603–606.
23.
HagedornR (2001) Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. 3rd ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
24.
HiggsJTitchenA (1998) Research and knowledge. Physiotherapy, 84(2), 72–79.
25.
HydeP (2004) Fool's gold: examining the use of gold standards in the production of research evidence. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(2), 89–94.
26.
JenkinsM (1998) Shifting ground or sifting sand? In: CreekJ, ed. Occupational therapy: new perspectives. London: Whurr.
27.
MayT (2001) Social research: issues, methods and processes. 3rd ed.Buckingham: Open University Press.
28.
GrayJA Muir (1997) Evidence-based healthcare: how to make health policy and management decisions. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
29.
NewmanMA (1992) Prevailing paradigms in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 40(1), 10–12.
30.
NolanMLundhU (2002) Ways of knowing in nursing and health care practice. In: CrookesPADaviesS, eds. Research into practice: essential skills for reading and applying research in nursing and health care. Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall, 1–22.
31.
ReasonP, ed (1994) Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage.
32.
RobsonC (1993) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
33.
RolfeG (1998) Expanding nursing knowledge: understanding and researching your own practice. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
34.
SchönDA (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
35.
StreubertHJCarpenterDR (1999) Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
36.
TaylorM (2001) Thoughts on science, RCTs and midwifery knowledge. Midwifery Matters — Association of Radical Midwives, 91, 3–8.
37.
TaylorMCSavin-BadenM (2001) Whose ‘evidence’ are we applying?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(5), 213.
38.
TitchenAHiggsJ (2001) A dynamic framework for the enhancement of health professional practice in an uncertain world: the practice-knowledge interface. In: HiggsJTitchenA, eds. Practice knowledge and expertise in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 215–25.
39.
ThompsonN (1995) Theory and practice in health and social welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
40.
UpshurREGVanDenKerhofEGGoelV (2001) Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 91–96.
41.
WilliamsB (1978) Descartes: the project of pure enquiry. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
