This paper is a guide to authors on using and reporting inferential statistics in scientific papers. In particular, it deals with errors often found in manuscripts submitted for publication, some of which may be corrected and some of which are impossible to change because of design problems in the research. Examples are provided to illustrate the points made and to guide the potential researcher through the presentation of statistical information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanDG (1999) Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.
2.
AltmanDGGoreSMGardnerMJPocockSJ (1983) Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. British Medical Journal, 286, 1489–93.
3.
AltmanDGMacHinDBryantTNGardnerMJ (2000) Statistics with confidence: Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 2nd ed.London: BMJ Books.
4.
BlandJMAltmanDG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1, 307–10.
5.
CampbellJACorrSJonesR (2005) Effective reporting of quantitative data. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(11), 495–500.
6.
DrummondAERWalkerMF (1994) The Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire for stroke patients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(11), 414–18.
7.
HammondAFreemanK (2004) The long-term outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of an educational-behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 520–28.
8.
HicksCM (1992) Practical research methods for physiotherapists. London: Churchill Livingstone.
9.
HollisSCampbellF (1999) What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 319, 670–74.
10.
JubyLCLincolnNBBermanP, on behalf of the SUE study group (1996) The effect of a stroke rehabilitation unit on functional and psychological outcome: A randomised controlled trial. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 6, 106–10.
11.
LangTASecicM (1997) How to report statistics in medicine. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.
12.
MacHinDCampbellMFayersPPinolA (1997) Sample size tables for clinical studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
MatthewsJNSAltmanDGCampbellMJRoystonP (1990) Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. British Medical Journal, 300, 230–35.
14.
MoherDSchulzKFAltmanDGLepageL, for the CONSORT group (2001) The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 357, 1191–94.
15.
ParkerCJGladmanJRFDrummondAERDeweyMELincolnNBBarerDLoganPARadfordKAon behalf of the TOTAL study group (2001) A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of leisure therapy and conventional occupational therapy after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15(1), 42–52.
16.
SiegelSCastellanNJ (1988) Non-parametric systems for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
SiemonsmaPCWalkerMF (1997) Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 11(4), 273–79.
18.
StewartSHarveyIPolandFLloyd-SmithWMugfordMFloodC (2005) Are occupational therapists more effective than social workers when assessing frail older people? Results of CAMELOT, a randomised controlled trial. Age and Ageing, 34(1), 41–46.
19.
WalkerMFLeonardi-BeeJBathPLanghornePDeweyMCorrSDrummondAGilbertsonLGladmanJRFJongbloedLLoganPParkerC (2004) An individual patient meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of community occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke, 35(9), 2226–32.
