A number of critical elements have been identified in assistive technology assessment and planning to optimise its integration into the educational environments of children and hence address their functional goals. These elements are as follows: adopting a collaborative think-tank team approach to which all educational team members contribute equally and where technology experts are consulted once the need for specific technical support or training is identified; involving the family by establishing mutual expectations and using effective communication strategies; and conducting in-depth assessment that identifies clear goals, includes task analysis within daily environments, examines the child-device interaction closely and investigates the resources available to implement assistive technology use.
With this backdrop, this paper reviews existing assessments and proposes that the Lifespace Access Profile (LAP) (Williams et al 1993) and Lifespace Access Profile (Upper Extension) (LAPUE) (Williams et al 1994) satisfy many of the criteria for effective assessment and planning advocated in the literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngeloDHJonesSDKokoskaSM (1995) Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11(September), 193–201.
2.
BeaverKAMannWC (1994) Provider skills for delivering computer access services: An assistive technology team approach. Technology and Disability, 3(2), 109–16.
3.
BehrmannMMSchepisMM (1994) Assistive technology assessment: A multiple case study review of three approaches with students with physical disabilities during transition from school to work. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 4(3), 202–10.
4.
CareyDMSaleP (1994) Practical considerations in the use of technology to facilitate the inclusion of students with severe disabilities. Technology and Disability, 3(2), 77–86.
5.
CopleyJ (2002) A team-based assessment and implementation process to address the assistive technology needs of children with multiple disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
6.
CopleyJZivianiJ (2004) Barriers to utilisation of assistive technology with children who have multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229–43.
7.
CowenJ (1994) Providing assistive technology as an occupational therapist in the school setting. Technology. Special Interest Section Newsletter, 4(4), 2–3.
8.
CramerSF (1992) Assistive technology training for special educators. Technology and Disability, 1(3), 1–5.
9.
DererKPolsgroveLRiethH (1996) A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, XIII(2), 62–80.
GarnerJBCampbellPH (1987) Technology for persons with severe disabilities: Practical and ethical considerations. Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 122–32.
12.
GoossensCCrainSS (1992) Utilising switch interfaces with children who are severely physically challenged: An emphasis on communication strategies. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
13.
HigginbothamDJ (1993) Assessing augmentative and alternative communication technology. Technology and Disability, 2(3), 42–56.
14.
Holder-BrownLParetteHP (1992) Children with disabilities who use assistive technology: Ethical considerations. Young Children, September, 73–77.
15.
HourcadeJJParetteHPHuerMB (1997) Family and cultural alert: Considerations in assistive technology assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, September/October, 40–44.
16.
HutingerPLJohansenJRobinsonLSchneiderC (1992) The Technology Team Assessment Process. Macomb, IL: Western Illinois University, College of Education.
17.
HutingerPJohansonJStoneburnerR (1996) Assistive technology applications in educational programs of children with multiple disabilities: A case study report on the state of the practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, XIII(1), 16–35.
18.
IngeKJShepherdJ (1995) Assistive technology applications and strategies for school system personnel. In: FlippoKFIngeKJBarcusJM, eds. Assistive technology: A resource for school, work and community. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes, 133–66.
KrothRBolsonM (1996) Family involvement with assistive technology. Contemporary Education, 68(1), 17–20.
21.
LivesayJMMurrayPE (1992) Integration of instructional technology into special education. Technology and Disability, 1(1), 7–18.
22.
LuborskyMR (1993) Sociocultural factors shaping technology usage: Fulfilling the promise. Technology and Disability, 2(1), 71–78.
23.
MannWCBeaverKA (1995) Assessment services: Person, device, family, and environment. In: American Occupational Therapy Association, ed. Assistive technology for persons with disabilities. 2nd ed.Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
24.
MargolisLGoodmanS (1999) Assistive technology services for students: What are these? Special Edition of Tech Express (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED437800). Washington, DC: United Cerebral Palsy Associations.
25.
McGregorGPachuskiP (1996) Assistive technology in schools: Are teachers ready, able, and supported?Journal of Special Education Technology, XIII(1), 4–15.
26.
NochajskiSMOddoCBeaverK (1999) Technology and transition: Tools for success. Technology and Disability, 11, 93–101.
27.
OreloveFPMalatchiA (1996) Curriculum and instruction. In: OreloveFPSobseyD, eds. Educating children with multiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach. 3rd ed.Baltimore: Paul H Brookes, 377–409.
28.
OreloveFPSobseyD (1996) Educating children with multiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach. 3rd ed.Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.
29.
ParetteH (1997) Assistive technology devices and services. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 267–80.
30.
ParetteHPBrothersonMJ (1996) Family participation in assistive technology assessment for young children with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 29–43.
31.
ParetteHPHourcadeJJ (1997) Family issues and assistive technology needs: A sampling of state practices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(3), 27–42.
32.
ParetteHPHourcadeJJVanBiervlietA (1993) Selection of appropriate technology for children with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, Spring, 18–22.
RainforthBYork-BarrJ (1997) Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.
35.
RESNA (1994) Technology and the individualised education program: A primer for parents and professionals. Technology and Disability, 3(2), 100–108.
36.
ScottSB (1997) Comparison of service delivery models influencing teachers' use of assistive technology for students with severe disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 11(1), 61–74.
37.
SchererM (2004) Connecting to learn: Educational and assistive technology for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
ShusterNE (1993) Addressing assistive technology needs in special education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 993–97.
39.
SummersJADell'OliverCTurnbullABensonHA (1990) Examining the individualised family service plan progress: What are family and practitioner preferences?Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 78–79.
40.
SwinthYCase-SmithJ (1993) Assistive technology in early intervention: Theory and practice. In: Case-SmithJ, ed. Occupational therapy and early intervention. Boston: Butterworth and Heinemann, 342–68.
41.
TamburelloCPeulerBC (1998) Making adaptive computer technology work: A team approach. Magazine of Physical Therapy.
42.
TodisB (2001) It can't hurt. Implementing AAC technology in the classroom for students with severe and multiple disabilities. In: WoodwardJCCubanL, eds. Technology, curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 27–46.
43.
TodisBWalkerHM (1993) User perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(3), 1–16.
44.
WilliamsWBStemachGWolfeSStangerC (1993) Lifespace Access Profile: Assistive technology planning for individuals with severe and multiple disabilities. Sebastopol, CA: Lifespace Access.
45.
WilliamsWBStemachGWolfeSStangerC (1994) Lifespace Access Profile Upper Extension: Assistive technology assessment and planning for individuals with physical disabilities. Sebastopol, CA: Lifespace Access.
