There is little information available about the management of children in a vegetative state and a minimally conscious state (VS and MCS), including diagnosis, assessment and treatment. This study investigated the intervention of occupational therapists in VS and MCS in the United Kingdom paediatric population.
A survey design was used and a postal questionnaire was sent to a group of 892 occupational therapists who were members of a paediatric or a neurological specialist section. Two hundred and seventy-one completed questionnaires were returned and the results of these were analysed. Two hundred and six (76%) of the respondents worked in a rehabilitation setting.
Twenty-five occupational therapists who worked with children in VS and MCS completed further questions about their assessments and interventions. The results indicate that children in VS and MCS receive fragmented and inconsistent occupational therapy services. Adult assessments are used with a paediatric population and therapists are not wholly satisfied with their interventions. A core group of occupational therapists involved with this population was identified as a result of this survey. It is suggested that these therapists may be able to form a working party to investigate a consistent therapeutic approach for this complex group of children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsK (1996) International Working Party on the Management of the Vegetative State: Summary report. Brain Injury, 10(11), 797–806.
2.
AndrewsKMurphyLMundayRLittlewoodC (1996) Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: Retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. British Medical Journal, 313, 13–16.
3.
AnsellBJKeenanJE (1989) Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile: A tool for assessing slow to recover head injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 104–108.
4.
BernatJL (2002) Questions remaining about the minimally conscious state. Neurology, 58(3), 337–38.
5.
BrymanACramerD (2001) Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows. Great Britain: Routledge.
6.
GiacinoJT (2002) The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. (Letter.)Neurology, 58(3), 506–507.
7.
GiacinoJTKalmerK (1997) The vegetative and minimally conscious states: A comparison of clinical features and functional outcome. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12(4), 36–51.
8.
GiacinoJTZaslerNDKatzDIKellyJPRosenbergJHFilleyCM (1997) Development of practice guidelines for assessment and management of the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12(4), 79–89.
9.
GiacinoJTAshwalSChildsNCranfordRJennettBKatzDIKellyJPRosenbergJHWhyteJZafonteDOZaslerND (2002) The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 58, 349–53.
10.
GillH (1996a) SMART and persistent vegetative state, part one. Occupational Therapy News, 4(9), 12–13.
11.
GillH (1996b) SMART and persistent vegetative state, part two. Occupational Therapy News, 4(10, 14–15.
12.
Gill-ThwaitesHMundayR (1999) The Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique: A comprehensive and integrated assessment and treatment protocol of the vegetative and minimally responsive patient. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9, 305–20.
13.
HagenCMalkmusDDurhamp (1972, revised 1997) Levels of cognitive functioning. Downey, Ca: Ranchos Los Amigos Hospital.
14.
HagedornR (2001) Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. 3rd ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
15.
HawleyCAWardABMagnayARLongJ (2004) Outcomes following childhood head injury: A population study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 75, 737–42.
16.
JennettB (2002) The vegetative state. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 73, 355–56.
17.
JennettBPlumF (1972) Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: A syndrome in search of a name. The Lancet, 1, 734–37.
18.
KampflASchmutzhardEFranzGPfauslerBHaringH-PUlmerHFelberSGolaszewskiSAichnerF (1998) Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. The Lancet, 351, 1763–67.
MajerusSVan der LindenMShielA (2000) Wessex Head Injury Matrix and Glasgow/Glasgow-Liège Coma Scale: A validation and comparison study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(2), 167–84.
21.
Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994a) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state – first of two parts. New England Journal of Medicine, 330(21), 1499–508.
22.
Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994b) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state – second of two parts. New England Journal of Medicine, 330(22), 1572–79.
23.
NelsonLJCranfordRE (1999) Michael Martin and Robert Wendland: Beyond the vegetative state. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 15, 427–53.
24.
RaderMAEllisDW (1994) The Sensory Stimulation Assessment Measure (SSAM): A tool for early evaluation of severely brain-injured patients. Brain Injury, 8(4), 309–21.
25.
RappaportMHallKMHopkinsKBellezaTCopeDN (1982) Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 118–23.
26.
RappaportMDoughertyAMKeltingDI (1992) Evaluations of coma and vegetative state. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 628–34.
27.
RobsonC (2000) Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
28.
Royal College of Physicians Working Group (1996) The permanent vegetative state. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians London, 30, 119–21.
29.
Royal College of Physicians Working Group (2003) The vegetative state: Guidance on diagnosis and management. Clinical Medicine, 3, 249–54.
30.
ShewmonAD (2000a) Coma prognosis in children. Part I: Definitional and methodological challenges – review article. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 17(5), 457–66.
31.
ShewmonAD (2000b) Coma prognosis in children. Part II: Clinical application – review article. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 17(5), 467–72.
32.
ShielAHornSAWilsonBAWatsonMJCampbellMJMcLellanDL (2000) The Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) main scale: A preliminary report on a scale to assess and monitor patient recovery after severe head injury. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14, 408–16.
33.
ShielAGellingLWilsonBColemanMPickardJD (2004) Difficulties in diagnosing the vegetative state. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 17(5), 457–66.
34.
TeasdaleGJennettB (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. The Lancet, 2, 81–84.
35.
TennantA (2005) Admission to hospital following head injury in England: Incidence and socio-economic associations. BMC Public Health, 5, 21. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/21 Accessed in November 2004.
36.
WadeDT (2001) Ethical issues in diagnosis and management of patients in the permanent vegetative state. British Medical Journal, 322, 352–54.
37.
WadeDTJohnstonC (1999) The permanent vegetative state: Practical guidance on diagnosis and treatment. British Medical Journal, 319, 841–44.
