This study was undertaken to determine whether questionnaire-based screening could be part of the solution to a long waiting list of referrals for occupational therapy assessment by identifying the requirement for clinical assessments. The performance of two questionnaires – the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) completed by parents and the Checklist of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (C-ABC) completed by teachers – was compared with a more traditional clinical assessment for the identification of DCD in children already referred to occupational therapy. It was found that the parent report was quite reliable in the identification of DCD if no other developmental problem was present. However, there was little benefit to using the teacher report to screen children.
Several confounding variables, including an unequal proportion of children with DCD in the sample and the inclusion of children who were younger than the age range of the DCDQ, may have influenced how well the questionnaires performed. Although questionnaires cannot replace a full clinical assessment, the results showed that there may be some value in including the parent report in the identification of DCD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanDG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders4th edition. Washington DC: APA.
3.
BarnettALKooistraLHendersonSE (1998) ‘Clumsiness’ as syndrome and symptom. (Editorial.) Human Movement Science, 17 (4–5), 435–47.
4.
BurtnerPWilhiteCBordegarayJMoedlDRoeRSavageA (1997) Critical review of visual perceptual tests frequently administered by pediatric therapists. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 17 (3), 39–61.
5.
CantellMHSmythMMAhonenTP (1994) Clumsiness in adolescence: educational, motor, and social outcomes of motor delay detected at 5 years. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11 (2), 115–29.
ChuSChiaSH (1997) A review of assessments used in paediatric occupational therapy. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 4 (5), 228–33.
8.
CosterW (1998) Occupational-centred assessment of children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52 (5), 337–44.
9.
CroceRNorvatMMcCarthyE (2001) Reliability and concurrent validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93, 275–80.
10.
Department of Health (1997) Modernising social services (White Paper). London: HMSO.
11.
Department of Health (1998) A first class service: quality in the new NHS. London: HMSO.
12.
DeweyDWilsonBN (2001) Developmental coordination disorder: what is it?Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20 (2/3), 5–28.
13.
DunfordCKellyJ (2001) Does screening children referred for coordination difficulties benefit the child and the occupational therapy process?NAPOT Journal (National Association of Paediatric Occupational Therapists), 5, 12–14.
14.
DunfordCStreetEO'ConnellHKellyJSibertJR (2004) Are referrals to occupational therapy for developmental coordination disorder appropriate?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89, 143–47.
15.
DunnLMDunnLM (1997) The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. 2nd ed.Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
16.
DussartG (1994) Identifying the clumsy child in school: an exploratory study. British Journal of Special Education, 21 (2), 81–86.
17.
FairgreaveEM (1989) Alternative means of assessment: a comparison of standardised tests identifying minimal cerebral dysfunction. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52 (3), 88–92.
18.
FisherAG (1994) Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Boulder, CO: Colorado State University.
19.
FletcherRHFletcherSWWagnerEH (1996) Clinical epidemiology: the essentials. London: Williams and Wilkins.
20.
GeuzeRHBorgerJMA (1993) Children who are clumsy, five years later. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10, 10–21.
21.
GeuzeRHJongmansMJSchoemakerMMSit-EnglesmanBCM (2001) Clinical and research diagnostic criteria for developmental coordination disorder: a review and discussion. Human Movement Science, 20, 7–47.
22.
GillbergICGillbergC (1989) Children with preschool minor neurodevelopmental disorders IV: behaviour and school achievement at age 13. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 520–31.
23.
GlascoeFPDworkinPH (1995) The role of parents in the detection of developmental and behavioural problems. Pediatrics, 95, 829–36.
24.
GoodmanR (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38 (5), 581–86.
25.
GoodmanRScottS (1999) Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behaviour Checklist: is small beautiful?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17–24.
26.
GreenDArcherJ (2000) Audit of a therapist training scheme of sensory integrative therapy. SENSOR NET, 11, 7–14.
27.
GreenDBishopTWilsonBCrawfordSKaplanBBairdG (2002) Alternatives to assessment for developmental coordination disorder: referral screening. (Abstract.) DCD-V Conference Proceedings. Banff, Alberta: DCD-V.
28.
HackettJ (2002) Waiting lists in paediatric occupational therapy. NAPOT Journal (National Association of Paediatric Occupational Therapists), 6 (2) 13–15.
29.
HellgrenLGillbergCGillbergICEnerskogE (1993) Children with deficits in attention, motor control and perception (DAMP) almost grown up: general health at 16 years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 35, 881–93.
30.
HellgrenLGillbergCIBagenholmAGillbergC (1994) Children with deficits in attention, motor control and perception (DAMP) almost grown up: psychiatric and personality disorders at age 16 years. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 35, 1255–71.
31.
HendersonSEBarnettA (1998) The classification of specific motor coordination disorders in children: some problems to be solved. Human Movement Science, 17 (4–5), 449–69.
32.
HendersonSEHallD (1982) Concomitants of clumsiness in young school children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 24, 448–60.
33.
HendersonSESugdenD (1992) Movement Assessment Battery for Children: manual. London: Psychological Corporation.
34.
HighJGoughAPenningtonDWrightC (2000) Alternative assessments for sensory integration dysfunction. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (1), 2–8.
35.
HowardLM (1997) Developmental coordination disorder: can we measure our intervention?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60 (5), 219–20.
36.
HowlinP (2000) Assessment instruments for Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 5, 120–29.
37.
JunaidKHarrisSRFulmerACarswellA (2000) Teachers' use of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children Checklist to identify children with motor coordination difficulties. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 12, 158–63.
38.
KaplanBJWilsonBNDeweyDCrawfordSG (1998) DCD may not be a discrete disorder. Human Movement Science, 17 (4–5), 471–90.
39.
KaplanBJDeweyDMCrawfordSGWilsonBN (2001) The term comorbidity is of questionable value in reference to developmental disorders: data and theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34 (6), 555–65.
40.
KingJGissaneC (2000) Confidence intervals enhance the value of research publicationsBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (4), 185–86.
41.
KroenkeK (2001) Studying symptoms: sampling and measurement issues. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 844–53.
42.
LandgrenMPetterrssonRKjellmanBGillbergC (1996) ADHD, DAMP, and other neurodevelopmental/psychiatric disorders in 6-year-old children: epidemiology and comorbidity. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 891–906.
43.
LosseAHendersonSEEllimanDHallDKnightEJongmansM (1991) Clumsiness in children – do they grow out of it? A ten-year follow-up study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 55–68.
44.
McConaughySAchenbachT (1994) Comorbidity of empirically based syndromes in matched general population and clinical samples. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35 (6), 1141–57.
45.
MiyaharaMTsujiiMHanaiTJongmansMBarnettALHendersonSEHoriMNakanishiKKageyamaH (1998) The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: a preliminary investigation of its usefulness in Japan. Human Movement Science, 17 (4–5), 679–97.
46.
NaglieriJ (1989) Matrix Analogies Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
47.
National Association of Paediatric Occupational Therapists (2003) ‘Doubly disadvantaged’: report of a survey on waiting lists and waiting times for children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). London: College of Occupational Therapists.
48.
PayneS (2002) Standardised tests: an appropriate way to measure the outcome of paediatric occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65 (3), 117–22.
49.
PiekJEdwardsK (1997) The identification of children with developmental coordination disorder by class and physical education teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67 (part 1), 55–67.
50.
PolatajkoHJFoxAM (1995) Final report on the conference. Children and clumsiness: a disability in search of definition. London, ON: International Consensus Meeting.
51.
RasmussenPGillbergC (2000) Natural outcome of ADHD with developmental coordination disorder at age 22 years: a controlled, longitudinal, community-based study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39 (11), 1424–31.
52.
RintalaPPienimakiKAhonenTCantellMKooistraL (1998) The effects of a psychomotor training programme on motor skill development in children with developmental language disorders. Human Movement Science, 17 (4–5), 721–37.
53.
RodgerS (1994) A survey of assessments used by paediatric occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 41, 137–42.
54.
RosbladBGardL (1998) The assessment of children with developmental coordination disorders in Sweden: a preliminary investigation of the suitability of the Movement ABC. Human Movement Science, 17 (4–5), 711–19.
55.
SchoemakerMMKalverboerAF (1994) Social and affective problems of children who are clumsy! How early do they begin?Special Issue of Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 130–40.
56.
SchoemakerMMEngelsmanB SmitsJongmansMJ (2003a) Psychometric properties of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children Checklist as a screening instrument for children with a developmental coordination disorder. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73 (3), 425–41.
57.
SchoemakerMMDe KoetAReinders-MesselinkHHerheij-JansenNFlaggerB (2003b) Screening of children with developmental coordination disorder. Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder, Conference Proceedings, 2–3 October. Ede, The Netherlands.
58.
SigurdssonEvan OsJFombonneE (2002) Are impaired childhood motor skills a risk factor for adolescent anxiety? Results from the 1958 UK birth cohorts and the National Child Development Study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159 (6), 1044–46.
59.
SPSS Inc. (1999) Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
60.
SugdenDAChambersME (1998) Intervention approaches and children with coordination disorder. Paediatric Rehabilitation, 2 (4), 139–47.
61.
SugdenDSugdenL (1991) The assessment of movement skill problems in 7- and 9-year old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 329–45.
62.
WiartIDarrahJ (2001) Review of four tests of gross motor development. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 279–85.
63.
WilsonBNKaplanBJCrawfordSGCampbellADeweyD (2000) Reliability and validity of a parent questionnaire on childhood motor skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54 (5), 484–93.
64.
WilsonPMcKenzieB (1998) Information processing deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder: a meta-analysis of research findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39 (6), 829–40.
65.
WrightHSugdenDA (1996) The nature of developmental coordination disorder: inter and intragroup differences. Adapted Physical Activity Quaterly, 13, 357–71.
66.
WrightHSugdenDANgRRanJ (1994) Identification of children with movement problems in Singapore: usefulness of the Movement ABC Checklist. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 150–57.
