The World Health Organisation's systems for classifying disability have been embraced, largely uncritically, by occupational therapists. In contrast, disability theorists critique the idea of normality against which judgements of deviance are made, challenge the privilege to make such judgements and contest the belief that the outcome of classification is necessarily benign or benevolent. Because systems for classifying impairments have been used to justify human rights' abuses, they cannot be used uncritically. Accordingly, this opinion piece draws on the work of disability theorists to undertake a sceptical interrogation of the classificatory practices of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnandSHansonK (1997) Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. Journal of Health Economics, 16, 685–702.
2.
Anon (2004) Editorial on language policy. Disability and Society, 19 (1).
3.
BadleyEM (1998) Classification of disability. In: McCollMABickenbachJE, eds. Introduction to disability. London: WB Saunders, 19–28.
4.
BarnesC (1996) Theories of disability and the origins of the oppression of disabled people in western society. In: BartonL, ed. Disability and society: emerging issues and insights. London: Longman, 43–60.
5.
BarnesCMercerG, eds (1996) Exploring the divide: illness and disability. Leeds: The Disability Press, 1–16.
BayliesC (2002) Disability and the notion of human development: questions of rights and capabilities. Disability and Society, 17 (7), 725–39.
8.
BickenbachJE (1993) Physical disability and social policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
9.
BlandM (1991) An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
BrättemarkM (1996) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH). Helios, 16, 4.
11.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists and the Health Services Directorate (1983) Guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Ottawa: Health Services Directorate.
12.
CharltonJI (1998) Nothing about us without us: disability, oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
College of Occupational Therapists (2000) Code of ethics and professional conduct for occupational therapists. London: COT.
14.
CorbettJ (1997) Independent, proud and special: calibrating our differences. In: BartonLOliverM, eds. Disability studies: past, present and future. Leeds: The Disability Press, 90–98.
15.
CrouchM (2003) The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Occupational Therapy News, 11 (1), 18–19.
16.
DavisLJ (1995) Enforcing normalcy: disability, deafness and the body. New York: Verso.
17.
DavisLJ (2002) Bending over backwards: disability, dismodernism and other difficult positions. New York: New York University Press.
18.
DornML (1998) Beyond nomadism: the travel narratives of a ‘cripple’. In: NastNJPileS, eds. Places through the body. London: Routledge, 183–206.
19.
DouardJW (1995) Disability and the persistence of the ‘normal’. In: ToombsSKBarnardDCarsonRA, eds. Chronic illness: from experience to policy. Bloomington, IND: Indiana University Press, 154–75.
20.
FoucaultM (1963) The birth of the clinic. New York: Random House.
21.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and punish. New York: Random House.
22.
FoucaultM (1978) The history of sexuality, volume 1. New York: Random House.
23.
FoucaultM (1980) Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
24.
FrostB (1999) Action on disability and development: working with disabled people's organisations in developing countries. In: StoneE, ed. Disability and development. Leeds: The Disability Press, 39–53.
25.
GallagherH (1990) By trust betrayed: patients, physicians and the licence to kill in the Third Reich. New York: Henry Holt.
26.
GleesonB (1999) Geographies of disability. London: Routledge.
27.
GobleC (2003) Controlling life? In: SwainJFrenchSCameronC.Controversial issues in a disabling society. Buckingham: Open University Press, 45–53.
28.
GoodBJ (1994) Medicine, rationality and experience. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
29.
GrayDBHendershotGE (2000) The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81 (Supp2), S10–S14.
30.
GroceNE (1999) Disability in cross-cultural perspective: rethinking disability. The Lancet, 354, 756–57.
31.
HahnH (2002) Academic debates and political advocacy: the US Disability Movement. In: BarnesCOliverMBartonL, eds. Disability studies today. Cambridge: Polity, 162–89.
32.
HammellKW (2003) Changing institutional environments to enable occupation among people with severe physical impairments. In: LettsLRigbyPStewartD, eds. Using environments to enable occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 35–53.
33.
HammellKW (2004) Using qualitative evidence to inform theories of occupation. In: HammellKWCarpenterC, eds. Qualitative research in evidence-based rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 14–26.
34.
HubbardR (1997) Abortion and disability: who should and who should not inhabit the world? In: DavisLJ, ed. The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge, 187–200.
35.
HurstR (2000) To revise or not to revise?Disability and Society, 15 (7), 1083–87.
36.
LawM (1992) Michel Foucault's historical perspective on normality and restrictive environments. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 5 (4), 193–203.
37.
MitchellDTSnyderSL (2003) The Eugenic Atlantic: race, disability, and the making of an international Eugenic Science. Disability and Society, 18 (7), 843–64.
38.
MorVGuadagnoliE (1988) Quality of life measurement: a psychometric Tower of Babel. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41 (11), 1055–58.
39.
NorthwayR (1997) Disability and oppression: some implications for nurses and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 736–43.
40.
OliverM (1996) Understanding disability: from theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
41.
PfeifferD (1998) The ICIDH and the need for its revision. Disability and Society, 13 (4), 503–23.
42.
PfeifferD (1999) The categorisation and control of people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21 (3), 106–107.
43.
PfeifferD (2000) The devils are in the details: the ICIDH 2 and the disability movement. Disability and Society, 15 (7), 1079–82.
44.
RockM (2000) Discounted lives? Weighing disability when measuring health and ruling on ‘compassionate’ murder. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 401–17.
SaidEW (1993) Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage.
48.
SaidEW (1996) Representations of the intellectual. New York: Random House.
49.
ShakespeareT (1997) Reviewing the past, developing the future. Skill Journal, 58, 8–11.
50.
ShapiroJP (1993) No pity: people with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books.
51.
SingerPMcVieJKuhseHRichardsonJ (1995) Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, 144–50.
52.
StewartD (2002) The new ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Concepts and implementation issues for occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy Now, 4 (4), 17–21.
53.
UPIAS (1976) Fundamental principles of disability. London: Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
54.
WHO (1980) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
55.
WHO (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
56.
WoodP (1987) Maladies imaginaires: some common misconceptions about the ICIDH. International Disability Studies, 9 (3), 125–28.
57.
YoungIM (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
