The College of Occupational Therapists' recent document, A Strategy for Modernising Occupational Therapy Services in Local Health and Social Care Communities - a Consultation (COT 2002), has provoked debate within the profession on the future delivery of occupational therapy services across health and social care. This seems an appropriate time to reflect on events of 30 years ago when, following the initial separation of health and social services, the profession was faced with the dilemma as to where occupational therapists should be located. This paper looks at the events and issues influencing the profession's decisions then, using a grounded theory approach and drawing on literature and documentation.
At that time, discussions raised concerns about the division of skills, adherence to the ethical code and the status within the profession of occupational therapists working in local authorities. The profession's immaturity, lack of autonomy and medical orientation were key factors in influencing its response, which focused on drawing all occupational therapists into the health service. Despite lengthy discussions and consultations, the profession could not influence events and some local authority occupational therapists automatically became part of the newly set-up social services departments. Analysis reveals a possible missed opportunity to establish a firm foundation for occupational therapy in social services, the consequences of which are still evident today.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel-SmithB (1978) National Health Service, the first thirty years. London: HMSO.
2.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1957) Domiciliary occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy, 20(7), 41.
3.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1968a) Council Minutes, December 1968. (Unpublished.) London:AOT.
4.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1968b) An outline of the syllabus of the course leading to the diploma. London: British Legion Press.
5.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1969a) Association members discuss the Seebohm report. Occupational Therapy, 32(5), 19–24.
6.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1969b) Council Minutes, March 1969. (Unpublished.) London:AOT.
7.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1970a) Council Minutes, May 1970. (Unpublished.) London:AOT.
8.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1970b) Council Minutes, October 1970. (Unpublished.) London:AOT.
9.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1970c) Health or welfare? The Association studies problems of a new service. Occupational Therapy, 33(7), 15–20.
10.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1973a) Problems affecting occupational therapists working in the local authority service. Occupational Therapy, 36(5), 342–44.
11.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1973b) Reorganisation of the Health Service: Transfer of staff. Occupational Therapy, 36(11), 544.
12.
Association of Occupational Therapists (1974) Department promises more talks on transfer of local authority staff. Occupational Therapy, 37(2), 25.
13.
BergB (1998) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
14.
BoveyF (1970) Recognition in local authority services. Occupational Therapy, 33(7), 33.
15.
British Association of Occupational Therapists (1975) Association comments on Circular HSC(IS)102. Occupational Therapy, 38(3), 51.
16.
British Association of Occupational Therapists (1979) Council Minutes, December 1979. (Unpublished.) London: BAOT.
17.
ChickJ (1974) Working in the community in a remedial and social role in 1974. Occupational Therapy, 37(2), 24–25.
18.
ChittyM (1968) An occupational therapist's collaboration with social workers in a welfare department. Occupational Therapy, 31(11), 19–24.
19.
College of Occupational Therapists (2002) A strategy for modernising occupational therapy services in local health and social care communities - a consultation. London: COT.
20.
Department of Health (1998) Modernising social services 1998. London: HMSO.
21.
Department of Health (1999) Health Act 1999. London: HMSO.
22.
Department of Health and Social Security (1968a) Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services (Seebohm Report). London: HMSO.
23.
Department of Health and Social Security (1968b) The administrative structure of medical and related services in England and Wales. London: HMSO.
24.
Department of Health and Social Security (1970a) Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970. London: HMSO.
25.
Department of Health and Social Security (1970b) National Health Service: The future structure of the National Health Service. London: HMSO.
26.
Department of Health and Social Security (1973) The remedial professions: A report by a Working Party set up in March 1973 by the Secretary of State for Social Services. London: HMSO.
27.
Derbyshire County Council (1968) Advertisement. Occupational Therapy, 31(11), 64.
28.
GlaserB (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
29.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The discovery of grounded theory, strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson.
30.
GroveM (1970) Growth of home services for the handicapped in a great city. Occupational Therapy, 33(3), 17–23.
31.
GubaELincolnY (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
HeraudB (1979) Sociology in the professions. London: Open Books.
33.
Herefordshire County Council (1972) Advertisement. Occupational Therapy, 35(6), 458.
34.
HillM (2000) Local authority social services, an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
35.
HollinsE (1970) The future of domiciliary occupational therapy services. (Unpublished.) London: AOT.
36.
JenkinsS (1970) Letter to the editor. Occupational Therapy, 33(7), 33–34.
37.
JonesM (1964) An approach to occupational therapy. London: Butterworths. KimmanceKChickJ (1973) Occupational therapy in the community. Occupational Therapy, 36(1), 33–37.
38.
LeathardA (1990) Health care provision: Past, present and future. London: Chapman and Hall.
39.
LloberaJ (1998) Historical and comparative research. In: SealeC, ed. Researching society and culture. London: Sage.
40.
Local Authority Social Services Act (1970) London: HMSO.
41.
London Borough of Hillingdon (1973) Advertisement. Occupational Therapy, 36(1), 86.
42.
MacdonaldE (1957) History of the Association. Occupational Therapy, 20(6), 30–33.
43.
MacdonaldE (1967) Occupational therapy in rehabilitation. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cassell.
44.
MorrisAButlerA (1972) No feet no drag. London: Sidgewick Jackson.
45.
MountainG (2000) Occupational therapy in social services: A review of the literature. London: COT.
46.
PatersonC (1998) Occupational therapy and the National Health Service, 1948–1998. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(7), 311–15.
47.
Redcliffe-Maude Report (1969) Royal Commission on Local Government in England. London: HMSO.
48.
RichardsS (1980) Community Occupational Therapy Annual Report 1979/80. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43(8), 264.
49.
RileyJ (1999) The integration of occupational therapists into the new social services: A dilemma for the profession. (Unpublished MSc dissertation.) Cardiff: University of Wales College of Medicine.
50.
StraussA (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: University Press.
51.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
TurnerA (1992) The history of occupational therapy. In: TurnerAFosterMJohnsonS, eds. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Principles, skills and practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
54.
WarrenM (1960) Local authorities and the care of handicapped people. Occupational Therapy, 23(10), 14–19.
55.
WilcockA (2001) Occupation for health, volume 1: A journey from self health to prescription. London: British Association and College of Occupational Therapists.
56.
WilcockA (2002) Occupation for health, volume 2: A journey from prescription to self health. London: British Association and College of Occupational Therapists.
