This research investigates the impact of selling strategies on selling effectiveness. The authors compare two selling strategies: (1) an agenda strategy, in which a salesperson attempts to influence the structure of the buyer’s decision by suggesting constraints that eliminate competitive products from consideration, and (2) a more typical selling strategy that summarizes the target product’s benefits. The results show that when sellers use an agenda selling strategy, target products receive higher evaluations and have higher probabilities of being considered and chosen. Buyer expertise moderates this effect, with the agenda strategy in most cases having more impact on novice buyers than on expert buyers. These findings demonstrate the importance of selling strategy to selling effectiveness, suggest the potential benefit for sellers of using selling strategies that attempt to influence the structure of the buyer’s decision, and provide support for the contingent nature of selling effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alba, Joseph W.
and J. Wesley Hutchinson. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise”. Journal of Consumer Research13 (March): 411-454.
2.
Anderson, Rolph E.
, Joseph F. Hair, Jr., and Alan J. Bush. 1999. Professional Sales Management. Houston, TX: DAME.
3.
Andrews, Rick L.
and Ajau K. Manrai. 1998. “Simulation Experiments in Choice Simplification: The Effects of Task and Context on Forecasting Performance”. Journal of Marketing Research35 (May): 198-209.
4.
Bagozzi, Richard P.
and Youjae Yi. 1991. “Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research”. Journal of Consumer Research17 (March): 426-439.
5.
Bettman, James R.1979. An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
Bettman, James R.
, Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne. 1998. “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes”. Journal of Consumer Research25 (December): 187-217.
7.
Brucks, Merrie
. 1985. “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior”. Journal of Consumer Research12 (June): 1-16.
8.
Chu, Wujin
, Eitan Gerstner, and James D. Hess. 1995. “Costs and Benefits of Hard-Sell”. Journal of Marketing Research35 (May): 198-209.
9.
Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr.1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs”. Journal of Marketing Research16 (February): 64-73.
10.
Crow, Lowell E.
, Richard W. Olshavsky, and John O. Summers. 1980. “Industrial Buyer’s Choice Strategies: A Protocol Analysis”. Journal of Marketing Research17 (February): 34-44.
11.
Dalrymple, Douglas J.
and William L. Cron. 1995. Sales Management: Concepts and Cases. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Donoho, Casey L.
and Michael J. Swenson. 1996. “Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Sales Tactics Effects on the Presentation of a Product Line”. Journal of Business Research37 (September): 51-61.
13.
Forrester, William R.
and William B. Locander. 1989. “Effects of Sales Presentation Topic on Cognitive Responses of Industrial Buying Groups”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science17 (Fall): 305-313.
14.
Futrell, Charles M.1998. Sales Management. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
15.
Futrell, Charles M.1999. Fundamentals of Selling. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Glazer, Rashi
, Barbara E. Kahn, and William L. Moore. 1991. “The Influence of External Constraints on Brand Choice: The Lone-Alternative Effect”. Journal of Consumer Research18 (June): 119-127.
17.
Hauser, John R.1986. “Agendas and Consumer Choice”. Journal of Marketing Research23 (August): 199-212.
18.
Hauser, John R.
and Birger Wernerfelt. 1990. “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets”. Journal of Consumer Research16 (March): 393-408.
19.
Hawes, Jon M.
, James T. Strong, and Bernard S. Winick. 1996. “Do Closing Techniques Diminish Prospect Trust?”Industrial Marketing Management25 (September): 349-360.
20.
Hinkelmann, Klaus
and Oscar Kempthorne. 1994. Design and Analysis of Experiments: Introduction to Experimental Design. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Hunt, Kenneth A.
and R. Edward Bashaw. 1999. “Using Buyer’s Information Processing to Formulate Selling Strategies”. Industrial Marketing Management28 (January): 99-107.
22.
Jackson, Ralph W.
and Robert D. Hisrich. 1996. Sales and Sales Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Johnson, Eric J.
and J. Edward Russo. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information”. Journal of Consumer Research21 (June): 542-550.
24.
Jolson, Marvin A.1975. “The Underestimated Potential of the Canned Sales Presentation”. Journal of Marketing39 (January): 75-78.
25.
Kahn, Barbara
, William L. Moore, and Rashi Glazer. 1987. “Experiments in Constrained Choice”. Journal of Consumer Research14 (June): 96-113.
26.
Levine, M. E.
and C. R. Plott. 1977. “Agenda Influence and Its Implications”. Virginia Law Review63:561-604.
27.
Levine, M. E.1981. “Effectiveness in Sales Interactions: A Contingency Framework”. Journal of Marketing45 (Winter): 85-103.
28.
Milliman, Ronald E.
and Douglas L. Fugate. 1988. “Using Trust-Trans- ference as a Persuasion Technique: An Empirical Investigation.”Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management8 (August): 1-7.
29.
Moon, Youngme
. 2000. “Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure From Consumers.”Journal of Consumer Research26 (March): 323-339.
30.
Mort, Terry A.1977. Systematic Selling: How to Influence the Buying Decision Process. New York: AMACOM.
31.
Nass, Clifford I.
, Youngme Moon, B. J. Fogg, Byron Reeves, and D. Christopher Dryer. 1995. “Can Computer Personalities Be Human Personalities?”International Journal of Human-Computer Studies43:223-239.
32.
Patton, W. E. III
. 1996. “Use of Human Judgment Models in Industrial Buyers’ Vendor Selection Decisions.”Industrial Marketing Manage- ment25:135-149.
33.
Peacock, Peter
and Harry L. Davis. 1970. “The Alphabet as an Independ- ent Variable.”Journal of Business43 (April): 205-209.
34.
Perkins, W. Steven
and Ram C. Rao. 1990. “The Role of Experience in In- formation Use and Decision Making by Marketing Managers.”Jour- nal of Marketing Research27 (February): 1-10.
35.
Rao, Akshay R.
and Kent B. Monroe. 1988. “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization.”Journal of Consumer Research15 (September): 253-264.
36.
Robinson, Patrick J.
, Charles W. Faris, and Yoran Wind. 1967. Industrial Buying and Creative Marketing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
Rosenthal, Robert
and Ralph L. Rosnow. 1985. Contrast Analysis: Fo- cused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Ross, William T.
and Elizabeth H. Creyer. 1993. “Interpreting Interac- tions: Raw Means or Residual Means?”Journal of Consumer Re- search20 (September): 330-338.
Shanteau, James
. 1992. “How Much Information Does an Expert Use? Is It Relevant?”Acta Psychologica81:75-86.
41.
Spence, Mark T.
and Merrie Brucks. 1997. “The Moderating Effects of Problem Characteristics on Experts’ and Novices’ Judgements.”Journal of Marketing Research34 (May): 233-247.
42.
Tversky, Amos
. 1972. “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.”Psychological Review79 (4): 281-299.
43.
Weitz, Barton A.1978. “Relationship Between Salesperson Performance and Understanding of Customer Decision Making.”Journal of Mar- keting Research15 (November): 501-516.
44.
Weitz, Barton A.1981. “Effectiveness in Sales Interactions: A Contingency Framework.”Journal of Marketing45 (Winter): 85-103.
45.
Weitz, Barton A.
, Harish Sujan, and Mita Sujan. 1986. “Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effec- tiveness.”Journal of Marketing50 (October): 174-191.
46.
Wright, Peter L.
and Frederick Barbour. 1975. “The Relevance of Deci- sion Process Models in Structuring Persuasive Messages.”Commu- nication Research2 (July): 246-259.
