Abstract
Reconsideration of the ‘non-initial main clause’ in Late Egyptian. Its main features (specific negation, being marked for temporal/narrative sequence, and being the ‘sentence’ part of closed sentential complexes) may be explained synchronically, as particular uses of the ‘circumstantial first present’, and/or as the result of diachronic interference. It is argued that the different modes of clause negation are syntactically of no, and semantically of little, significance on the sentence level. The sequential/continuative usage can be subsumed to ‘co-ordination’ as part of the functional pattern of circumstantials. The uses of the form in closed complexes following temporal wnn=f Ḥr s
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
