For ultrafiltration membranes based on a sulphonate-containing polyamide, the basic possibility of controlling their sorption and partitioning properties in relation to bovine serum albumin by immobilising transition metal ions has been shown. It has been found that the modification of membranes leads to a considerable increase in their sorption capacity in the pH region corresponding to the isoelectric point of protein.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MahendranR.Preparation, characterization and effect of annealing on performance of cellulose acetate/sulfonated polysulfone and cellulose acetate/epoxy resin blend ultrafiltration membranes. Eur. Polym. J., 40(3): 623–633 (2004).
2.
BarronaG.-N.Negatively charged poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration membranes by sulfonation. J. Membr. Sci., 290(1–2): 46–54 (2007).
3.
ArthanareeswaranG.Preparation and performance of polysulfone–sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) blend ultrafiltration membranes. Appl. Surf. Sci., 253(21): 8705–8712 (2007).
4.
ChengJ.-H., and ChungT.-Sh.Synthesis of mosaic membranes and application for egg white protein fractionation by partitioned free-flow isoelectric focusing. J. Membr. Sci., 353(1–2): 94–102 (2010).
5.
WangQ.Ultrafiltration membranes composed of highly cross-linked cationic polymer gel: the network structure and superior separation performance. Adv. Mater., 23(17): 2004–2008 (2011).
TangB.A novel positively charged asymmetry membrane from poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) by benzyl bromination and in situ amination. Pt II. Effect of charged group species on membrane performance and morphologies. J. Membr. Sci., 268(2): 123–131 (2006).
8.
SuY., and LiCh.Controlled adsorption of bovine serum albumin on poly(acrylonitrile)-based zwitterionic membranes. React. Funct. Polym., 68(1): 161–168 (2008).
9.
MolekJ.Effect of electrostatic interactions on transmission of PEGylated proteins through charged ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 353(1–2): 60–69 (2010).
10.
KurekD.V.Prospects of using chitin-binding domains for the isolation and purification of recombinant proteins by affine chromatography. Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol., 45(1): 5–13 (2009).
11.
ChenZ.Preparation and performance of cellulose acetate/PEI blend microfiltration membranes and their applications. J. Membr. Sci., 235(1–2): 73–86 (2004).
12.
PekelN.Metal ion promoted hydrogels for bovine serum albumin adsorption: Cu(II) and Co(II) chelated poly(N-vinylimidazole)-maleic acid). J. Colloids Surf. B, 42: 89–96 (2005).
13.
BarrosoT.Preparation and characterization of cellulose affinity membrane for human immunoglobulin G (lg G) purification. J. Membr. Sci., 348(1–2): 224–230 (2010).
14.
RamachandhranV.Separation behavior of composite polyamide membranes from mixed amines: effects of interfacial reaction condition and chemical post-treatment. Separ. Sci. Technol., 44(3): 599–614 (2009).
15.
HurwitzG.Probing polyamide membranes surface charge, zeta potential, wettability and hydrophilicity with contact angle measurements. J. Membr. Sci., 349(1–2): 349–357 (2010).
16.
XuJ.Surface modification of thin-film-composite polyamide membranes for improved reverse osmosis performance. J. Membr. Sci., 370(1–2): 116–123 (2011).
17.
UzunL., and DenizliA.Metal-chelated polyamide hollow fibers for human serum albumin separation. Appl. Polym. Sci., 86: 3346–3354 (2002).
18.
CherkasovA.N.Proximate analysis of the structure of ultrafiltration membranes in the course of their development. Membrany, (14): 3–17 (2002).
19.
BerezkinV.V.Electrical conductivity of KCl solutions in the pores of nuclear filters and their surface electric properties. Kolloidn. Zh., 56(3): 319–325 (1994).
20.
TristramG.R.The Proteins, Vol. 1, ed. by NeurathH., and BaileyK.Academic Press, New York, NY, p. 244 (1953).
21.
WhiteA.Principles Biochem., 1: 125 (1978).
22.
Lur'yeYu. Yu.Analytical Chemistry Handbook.Khimiya, Moscow, 480 pp. (1979).
23.
MitrofanovaN.V.The adsorption of proteins and dyes on polyethylene terephthalate track-etched membranes modified with polymers. Kolloidn. Zh., 65(2): 248–251 (2003).
24.
KhataibeE.V.Metal–ceramic membranes: structure and properties. I. Structurally selective and surface properties of ultrafiltration membranes. Membrany, (16): 3–9 (2002).
25.
BellamyL.I.The Infrared Spectra of Complex Molecules.Wiley, New York, NY (1958).
26.
Tsundel'G.Hydration and Intermolecular Interaction.Mir, Moscow, 430 pp. (1972).
27.
SalginS.Adsorption of bovine serum albumin on polyether sulfone ultrafiltration membranes: determination of interfacial interaction energy and effective difflusion coefficient. J. Membr. Sci., 278: 251–260 (2006).
28.
MoH.Fouling of RO membrane by protein (BSA): effects of pH, calcium, magnesium, ionic strength and temperature. J. Membr. Sci., 315(1–2): 28–35 (2008).
29.
NordeW., and LuklemaJ.Why proteins prefer interfaces. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 2: 183–202 (2001).
