The most appropriate means of dealing with offenders with an intellectual disability has become a contentious issue of postdeinstitutionalisation. Proponents of normalisation argue that offenders should be held accountable and responsible for their actions in the same way as nondisabled citizens. Critics argue that such an approach fails to recognise the multiple disadvantages under which most offenders labour. Unfortunately, much of this debate is carried out at the level of rhetoric only because comparatively little is known about the experiences of offenders within the system. This study examines the characteristics and experiences of two groups of offenders with an intellectual disability held in custody: one within the mainstream prison system, the other within a secure facility on the grounds of an institution. Although not without its disadvantages, the secure facility appears better equipped to meet the multiple and complex needs of this grossly disadvantaged group of offenders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association on Mental Retardation (AAMR). (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification and systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Barton, L. (1993). The struggle for citizenship: The case of disabled people. Disability, Handicap and Society, 8(3), 235-248.
4.
Bodna, B. (1987). People with intellectual disability and the criminal justice system. In D. Challinger (Ed.), Intellectually disabled offenders: Proceedings of a seminar held 22-24 April 1987 (pp. 11-35). Canberra: Australian Institute for Criminology.
5.
Boer, D. P., Dorward, J., Gauthier, C. M., & Watson, D. R. (1995). Treating intellectually disabled sex offenders. Offender Treatability, 7(3), 30-33.
6.
Day, K. (1988, November). A hospital based treatment programme for male mentally handicapped offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 635-644.
7.
Denkowski, G., & Denkowski, K. (1985). The mentally retarded offender in the state prison system: Identification, prevalence, adjustment and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 12(1), 55-70.
8.
Donaldson, K. (1994, August/September). People with an intellectual disability in prisons. Vacro Reporter, 2-3.
9.
Endicott, O. (1991). Persons with intellectual disability who are incarcerated for criminal offences: A literature review. Toronto: Research Branch, Communications and Corporate Development, Correctional Services Canada.
10.
Fabrycki Reed, E. (1989). Legal rights of mentally retarded offenders: Hospice and habilitation. Criminal Law Bulletin, 25(5), 411-443.
11.
Finn, M. (1992). Prison misconduct among mentally retarded inmates. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 2(3), 287-299.
12.
Garcia, S., & Steele, H. (1988). Mentally retarded offenders in the criminal justice and mental retardation services systems in Florida: Philosophical, placement and treatment issues. Arkansas Law Review, 41, 809-859.
13.
Hayes, S. (1995). People with an intellectual disability—Overrepresented in the criminal justice system. Socio Legal Bulletin, 15, 18-23.
Hayes, S., & McIlwain, D. (1988). The prevalence of intellectual disability in the NSW prison population: An empirical study. Report to the Criminology Research Council, Canberra, Australia.
16.
Hermann, H., Mills, J., McGorry, P., & Singh, B. (1991, February). Hidden severe psychiatric morbidity in sentenced prisoners: An Australian study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(2), 236-239.
17.
Jones, G. P., & Coombes, K. (1990). The prevalence of intellectual deficit among the Western Australian prisoner population. Perth, Australia: Department of Corrective Services.
18.
Lund, J. (1990, May). Mentally retarded criminal offenders in Denmark. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 726-731.
19.
Lyall, I., Holland, A. J., Collins, S., & Styles, P. (1995). Incidence of persons with a learning disability detained in prison custody: A needs assessment for service development. Medicine Science and the Law, 35, 61-71.
20.
MacEachron, A. (1979). Mentally retarded offenders: Prevalence and characteristics. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84(2), 165-176.
21.
McAfee, J., & Gural, M. (1988). Individuals with mental retardation and the criminal justice system: The view from states’ attorneys general. Mental Retardation, 26(1), 5-12.
22.
New South Wales Department of Youth and Corrective Services. (1985). The missing services: Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on Intellectually Handicapped Adult Offenders in New South Wales. Sydney, Australia: Author.
23.
Nirje, B. (1985). The basis and logic of the normalisation principle. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 11(2), 65-68.
24.
Noble, J., & Conley, R. (1992). Towards an epidemiology of relevant attributes. In R. Conley, R. Luck-asson, & G. Bouthilet (Eds.), The criminal justice system and mental retardation: Defendants and victims (pp. 51-62). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
25.
Petersilla, J. (1997). Justice for all? Offenders with mental retardation and the California corrections systems. The Prison Journal, 77(4), 358-381.
26.
Rockowitz, R. (1986). Developmentally disabled offenders: Issues in developing and maintaining services. The Prison Journal, 66(1), 19-23.
27.
Santamour, M. (1986). The offender with mental retardation. The Prison Journal, 66(1), 3-17.
28.
Smith, C., Algozzine, B., Schmid, R., & Hennly, T. (1990). Prison adjustment of youthful inmates with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 28(3), 177-181.
29.
Svendsen, B. B., & Werner, J. (1977). Offenders with ordinary services for the mentally retarded in Denmark. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Research to practice in mental retardation, Volume 1, Care and intervention (International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency [IASSMD]) 419-424. Cited in New South Wales Law Reform Commission (1993). People with an intellectual disability and the criminal justice system: Appearances before local courts (Research Report No. 4., Hayes, S.), Sydney, p. 8.
30.
Veneziano, L., & Veneziano, C. (1996). Disabled inmates. In M. D. McShane & F. P. Williams III (Eds.), Encyclopedia of American prisons. New York: Garland.
31.
Walker, J. (1989). Prison sentences in Australia: Estimates of the characteristics of offenders sentenced to prison in 1987-88. In P. Wilson (Ed.), Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice No. 20. Canberra: Australian Institute for Criminology.
32.
Wolfensberger, W. (1972). Normalisation: The principles of normalisation in human management. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
