The traditional prison is not an institution fit for the rehabilitation of criminals. Its structural, social, and cultural realities suppress the ability and motivation of inmates to construct new, more positive perceptions of themselves and of their world, and thus greatly limit their prospects of undergoing an essential change and abandoning crime. In several prisons in Israel, there are special wards for religious rehabilitation. In the judgment of prison authorities, these wards enjoy significant success in the rehabilitation of their inmates. This study analyzes the special features of the prison wards for religious rehabilitation, such as the change in language, the new centering of the prisoners' world, the adoption of new social and self-images, and the moderation of the characteristics of the total institution. Thus, these religious wards facilitate construction of a new noncriminal reality. This study examines the wards `influence on the prisoners' perceptions of reality and their behavior in these wards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, F. A. (1981). The decline of the rehabilitation ideal: Penal policy and social purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Ben David, S. (1992). Staff to inmate relations in total institution: A model of five modes of association. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36, 209-219.
3.
Berger, P. (1967). The social reality of religion. New York: Penguin.
4.
Berger, P. (1970). Identity as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. In J. Curtis & J. Petras (Eds.), The sociology of knowledge. New York: Praeger.
5.
Berger, P. , & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor.
6.
Broom, L. & Selznick, P. (1979). Essentials of sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Campos, J. J. (1983). The importance of affective communication in social referencing. Merrille Palmer Quarterly, 29, 83-87.
8.
Cloward, R. , & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. New York: Free Press.
9.
Cohen, E. , Ben Yehuda, N., & Aviad, J. (1987). Recentering the world: The quest for "elective" centers in secularized universe. Social Review, 35, 320-346.
10.
Cohen, S. (1977). Foreword and concluding comments. In W. Probyn (Ed.), Angelface—The making of criminal (p. 248). London: Allen & Unwin.
11.
Cromer, G. (1979). Repentant delinquents: A religious approach to rehabilitation. Crime and Social Deviance, 7(3),169-178. (Hebrew)
12.
Davidson, T. R. (1974). Chicano prisoners: The key to San Quentin. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
13.
Durkheim, E. (1965). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
14.
Eliade, M. (1961). The sacred and the profane. New York: Harper Books.
15.
Farrington, K. (1992). The modem prison as total institution: Public perception versus objective reality. Crime and Delinquency, 38(1), 6-26.
16.
Fischer, C. T. , & Wertz, F. J. (1979). Empirical phenomenological analysis of being criminally victimized. In A. Giorgi, R. Knowles, & D. L. Smith (Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 135-158). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
17.
Fowler, R. , Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
18.
Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man's search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. Boston: Beacon.
19.
Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and its discontents (J. Strachey, Ed. and Trans.). New York: Norton.
20.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. R. (1979). Effective correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 463-484.
21.
Glaser, D. (1964). The effectiveness of a prison andparole system. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
22.
Gluckman, M. (1965). Politics, law and ritual in tribal society. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
23.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Anchor Books.
24.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Assays on face to face behavior. New York: Doubleday.
25.
Goodstein, L. , Mackenzie, D. L., & Shotland, R. L. (1984). Personal control and inmate adjustment to prison. Criminology, 22, 343-369.
26.
Hargrove, B. (1979). The sociology of religion. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM.
27.
Heffernan, E. (1972). Making it in prison: The square, the cool and the life. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Hewitt, J. P. (1988). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
Irwin, J. , & Cressey, D. (1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10, 142-155.
31.
James, W. (1961). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier.
32.
James, W. (1968). The self. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gregen (Eds.), The self in social interaction. New York: John Wiley.
33.
Johnson,R. (1987). Hard time: Understanding and reforming the prison. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
34.
Jules-Rosette, B. (1975). African apostles. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33, 499-517.
36.
Kertzer, D. I. (1988). Ritual, politics and power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Lincoln, B. (1989). Discourse and the construction of society. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Lombardo, L. (1982). Stress, change and collective violence in prison. In R. Johnson & H. Toch (Eds.), The pains of imprisonment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Maimonides . (1949). The code of Maimonides, laws of repentance. Trans. from Hebrew by M. Hyamson. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Marshall, I. H. (1981). Correctional treatment processes: Rehabilitation reconsidered. In R. R. Roberg & V. J. Webb (Eds.), Critical issues in corrections: Problems, trends and prospects. St. Paul, MN: West.
41.
McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
42.
McKelvey, B. (1977). American prisons: A history of good intentions. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
43.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Moore, D. K. (1992). The limits of freedom, or the social construction of "new trouble" for re-incarcerated offenders with "limited options."Dissertation Abstracts International, 53,312A.
45.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Nye, F. I. (1958). Family relationships and delinquent behavior. New York: John Wiley.
47.
Peled, Y. (1994, June). Religious rehabilitation within the prison system in Israel. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation through Religion, Jerusalem, Israel.
48.
Reckless, W. (1967). The crime problem. New York: Appleton.
49.
Rotenberg, M. (1987). Re-biographing and deviance. New York: Praeger.
50.
Sarbin, T. R. , & Adler, N. (1970). Self-reconstitution processes: A preliminary report. Psychoanalytic Review, 4, 599-616.
51.
Sarbin, T. R. , & Kitsuse, J. I. (1994). Constructing the social. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Season, J. , & Kenrick, D. (1992). Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54.
Shapira, R. & Navon, D. (1985). Staff-inmates cooperation in Israeli prisons: Toward a non-functionalistic theory of total institutions. International Review of Modern Sociology, 15, 131-146.
55.
Shils, E. (1975). Center and periphery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Shoham, S. G. (1974). Society and the absurd. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
57.
Stott, D. H. (1950). Delinquency and human nature. Dunfermline, Scotland: Carnegie United Trust.
58.
Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
59.
Thomas, C. W. , & Peterson, D. M. (1976). Prison organization and inmate subculture. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
60.
Timor, U. (1989). Commitment to the Jewish religion as a way of rehabilitating delinquents. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University Press.
61.
Tzur, M. (1982). Both sides of the cell. Jerusalem, Israel: Yediot Aharonot. (Hebrew)
62.
Warren, M. Q. (1983). Applications of Interpersonal-Maturity Theory to offender populations. In W. S. Laufer & J. M. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
63.
Watzlawick, P. (1984). Self fulfilling prophecy. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? Contributions to constructivism. New York: Norton.
64.
Yoder, P. (1990). Guilt, the feeling and the force: A phenomenological study of the experience of feeling guilty. (Doctoral dissertation, The Union Institute, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 5341B.
65.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1972). Pathology of imprisonment. Society, 9, 4-8.
