The deterrent effects of initial arrest are examined in a sample of first-time apprehended shoplifters in a court-referred treatment program. The findings indicate that a majority of first-time arrested shoplifters terminated their shoplifting activity after initial arrest. Those who attended the program have substantially lower recidivism rates and longer intervals than those who did not attend the program. Implications of the findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, D. (1984). Event history analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Andenaes, J. (1971). Deterrence and the specific offenses. University of Chicago Law Review, 39, 537-559.
3.
Berk, R. , Cambell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). The deterrence effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57, 698-708.
4.
Blossfeld, H. , Hamerle, A., & Mayer, K. (1989). Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Blumstein, A. , Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. (1986). Criminal careers and career criminals (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
Blumstein, A. , & Moitra, S. (1980). The identification of career criminals from chronic offenders in a cohort. Law and Public Quarterly, 2, 321-334.
7.
Boudouris, J. (1984). Recidivism as a process. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services & Rehabilitation, 8, 41-51.
8.
Cameron, M. O. (1964). The booster and the snitch. New York: Free Press.
9.
Chambliss, W. (1967). Types of deviance and the effectiveness of legal sanctions. Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 703-719.
10.
Chung, C. , Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. (1991). Survival analysis: A survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 59-98.
11.
Clarke, R. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136-147.
12.
Cohen, F. , & Stark, R. (1974). Social labeling and the five-finger discount. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 11, 25-30.
13.
Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
Davis, M. , Lundman, R., & Martinez, R. Jr. (1991). Private corporate justice: Store police, shoplifters, and civil recovery. Social Problems, 38, 395-411.
15.
Farrington, D. (1977). The effects of public labeling. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 112-125.
16.
Farrington, D. , Ohlin, L., & Wilson, J. (1986). Understanding and controlling crime. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17.
Farrington, D. , Osbom, S. G., & West, D. J. (1978). The persistence of labeling effects. British Journal of Criminology, 18, 277-284.
18.
Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. Department of Justice . (1993). Uniform crime reports for the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
Glueck, S. (1928). Principles of a rational penal code. Harvard Law Review, 41, 453-482.
20.
Gottfredson, M. , & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
Hagan, J. (Ed.). (1982). Deterrence reconsidered: Methodological innovations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Hagan, J. (1989). Structural criminology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23.
Jensen, G. (1969). Crime doesn't pay: Correlates of a shared misunderstanding. Social Problems, 17, 189-201.
24.
Klein, M. (1974). Labeling, deterrence, and recidivism: A study of police disposition of juvenile offenders. Social Problems, 22, 292-303.
25.
Klemke, L. (1978). Does apprehension for shoplifting amplify or terminate shoplifting activity?Law and Society Review, 12, 391-403.
26.
Klemke, L. (1982). Exploring juvenile shoplifting. Sociology and Social Research, 67, 59-75.
27.
Kraut, R. (1976). Deterrent and definitional influences on shoplifting. Social Problems, 23, 358-368.
28.
Lemert, E. (1951). Social pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Lempert, R. (1981-1982). Organizing for deterrence: Lessons from a study of child support. Law and Society Review, 16, 513-568.
30.
Maltz, M. D. (1984). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31.
Peterson, T. (1988). The specification and estimation of continuous state space hazard rate models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
32.
Schmidt, P. , & Witte, A. D. (1988). Predicting recidivism using survival models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
33.
Schwartz, R. , & Skolnick, J. (1962). Two studies of legal stigma. Social Problems, 10, 133-138.
34.
Sherman, L. , & Smith, D. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
35.
Sherman, L. W. , & Berk, R. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
36.
Tlittle, C. (1975). Deterrents or labeling?Social Forces, 53, 399-410.
37.
Tlittle, C. (1980). Sanctions and social deviance. New York: Praeger.
38.
Tuma, N. B. , & Hannan, M. T. (1984). Social dynamics: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press.
39.
Visher, C. , Lattemore, P., & Linset, R. (1991). Predicting the recidivism of serious youthful offenders using survival models. Criminology, 29, 329-366.
40.
Zimring, F. , & Hawkins, G. (1973). Deterrence: The legalthreatin crime control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
