Moral Judgment by Criminals and Conformists as a Tool for Examination of Sociological Predictions

Abstract

This study illustrates how predictions from sociological approaches might be operationalized using a psychological measure, moral judgment. A prediction based on Merton's anomia theory, that offenses elicit greatest justification when the importance of a socioeconomic goal is high and availability of means to achieve that goal is low, was investigated. The design was a multifactorial manipulation of the goal and availability of means as well as other relevant factors. Results from this experimental procedure were examined on the background of data from Eysenck's personality questionnaire. The findings point to interactive effects of the importance of a goal, of availability of means and severity of offenses on justification for those offenses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

Anderson, N. H. (1991). Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blame. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory (pp. 243-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Anderson, N. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Ellis, L. (1987). Relationships of criminality and psychopathy with eight other apparent behavioral manifestations of sub-optimal arousal. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 905-925.

Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Crime and personality (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Eysenck, H. J. (1987). The definition of personality disorders and criteria appropriate for their description. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3, 211-219.

Eysenck, H. J. , & Eysenck, M. W. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

10.

Eysenck, H. J. , & Gudjonson, G. H. (1989). The causes and cures of criminality. New York: Plenum.

11.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

12.

Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672-682.

13.

Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

14.

Merton, R. K. (1982). Social research and the practicing professions. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

15.

Schachat, R. (1982). Doubts about anomie and anomia. In S. G. Shoham (Ed.), Alienation and anomie revisited (pp. 71-92). Messina, Italy: Ramot Educational Systems.

16.

Shoham, S. G. (1977). The tentalus process: Segments of the law of personality. Tel Aviv: Tcherikover. (Hebrew)

17.

Shoham, S. G. , & Rahav, G. (1983). The mark of Kain: The stigma of social deviance and crime. Jerusalem: Shocken. (Hebrew)

18.

Shoham, S. G. , & Rahav, G. , & Addad, M. (1987). Criminology: Theories, research and applications. Jerusalem: Shocken. (Hebrew)

19.

Wolf, Y. (1989). Moral judgment on the basis of information about intention and damage as a validation test for a naive definition of aggression. Psychologia, 2, 120-130 (Hebrew).

20.

Wolf, Y. (1995). Moral judgment by alleged sociopaths as a means of coping with problems of definition and identification in Mealey's model. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 577-578.

21.

Wolf, Y. , Battash, Y. , Addad, M. , & Walters, J. (1992). Valuation of moral information by juvenile delinquents: International Journal of Group Tensions, 22, 39-62.

22.

Wolf, Y. , Ron, N. , & Walters, J. (1996). Modularity in moral judgment by police officers. Policing and Society, 6, 37-52.

23.

Zuckerman, M. (1991). The psychobiology of personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.