Moral Judgment among Incarcerated Offenders from a Psychotherapeutic Background

Abstract

The present work is a preliminary attempt to examine whether the theory of information integration is applicable as aframework for the study of moral judgment by incarcerated offenders who underwent formal psychotherapy in prison (psychotherapeutic background). The hypothesis, derived from the theory, was that judgment would be based on more than a single source of information. This hypothesis was tested against an alternative, unidimensional prediction derived from the theory of object relations. Nineteen subjects, 14 of them hospitalized in the psychiatric ward of an Israeli prison, participated in a study based on a single subject experimental design, where every subject participated in all experimental conditions. Seven of them were diagnosed as borderline and seven as anti-social. Each subject responded to an experimental questionnaire which included hypothetical episodes about property crimes committed by two offenders. The subject was instructed to identify with one of the offenders. Three pieces of information were included in each episode: the intent of each of the two offenders and the size of the job.' All episodes derived from a complete factorial design were presented to each subject. In one replication the subject assigned blame to the offender with whom he identified, and in the other he assigned blame to the accomplice. Meaningful differences were found between the groups of prisoners, as reflected in the importance assigned to the three sources of information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Addad, M. (in press). Dimensions of personality and methods of judgment among criminal populations. Annales Medico-psychologiques.

Adelman, S. A. (1985). Pills as traditional objects: a dynamic understanding of the use of medication in psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 48, 246-253.

Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

Anderson, N. H. (1991). Psychodynamics of everyday life: blaming and avoiding blame. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory (pp. 243-275). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chessick, R. (1972). Intensive psychotherapy of the borderline patient. New York: Jason Aronson.

Heider, F. (1967). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

Horner, A. J. (1982). Object relations and the developing ego in therapy. New York: Jason Aronson.

Kernberg, O. F. (1982). Narcissism. In S. L. Gilman (Ed.), Introducing psychoanalytic theory (pp. 126-136). New York: Bruner/Mazel.

10.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in the development of moral thought and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

11.

Leon, M. (1982). Rules in children's moral judgment: integration of intent, damage and rationale information. Developmental Psychology, 18, 835-842.

12.

Lowe, G. R. (1969). Personal relationships in psychological disorders. Baltimore: Penguin.

13.

Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Abnormal and Social Psychology, 5, 6-10.

14.

Mahler, M. S. (1975). Separation-individuation. In M. S. Mahler (Ed.), The selected papers of M. S. Mahler (Vol. 2). New York: Jason Aronson.

15.

Meisner, W. W. (1978). Theoretical assumptions of the concepts of the borderline personality. American Psychoanalytic Association, 26, 559-598.

16.

Minkowitz, A. (1961). Imitation and empathy. Megamot, 11, 211-231 (Hebrew).

17.

Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. London: Roultedge & Kegan Paul.

18.

Stein, V. E. (1969). Guilt: theory and therapy. London: George Allen & Unwin.

19.

Wolf, Y. , Battash, I. , Addad, M. , & Walters, J. (1992). Validation of moral information by juvenile delinquents. International Journal of Group Tensions, 22, 39-62.