In most correctional settings, inmates with central nervous system dysfunction do not receive comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. However, in some settings neuropsychological assessment data may contribute valuable information to decisions regarding an inmate's management and rehabilitation. Several case studies are reported to illustrate inmate disposition decisions affected by this additional information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beck, A. T. , Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.
2.
Fowles, G. P. (1988). Neuropsychologically impaired offenders: Considerations for assessment and treatment. Psychiatric Annals, 18, 692-697.
3.
Franzen, M. D. (1985). Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery. In D. J. Keyser & R. C. Sweetland (Eds.), Test critiques (Vol. 3, pp. 402-414). Kansas City; Test Corporation of America.
4.
Franzen, M. D. (1986). Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery, Form II. In D. J. Keyser & R. C. Sweetland (Eds.), Test Critiques (Vol. 4, pp. 382-386). Kansas City: Test Corporation of America.
5.
Golden, C. J. , Purisch, A. D., & Hammeke, T. A. (1985). Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Forms I and II. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
6.
Iverson, G. L. , Franzen, M. D., Demarest, D. S., & Hammond, J. A. (1993). Neuropsychological screening in correctional settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 347-358.
7.
Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
8.
Spielberger, C. D. , Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
