A quantitative analysis of 44 rigorously controlled offender treatment studies, published between 1970 and 1991, was undertaken to determine if the factors suggested by previous reviewers to be essential to program success are in fact related to efficacy. The results indicated that only six factors were significantly associated with the efficacy of programs. These factors included: (a) a sound conceptual model; (b) multifaceted programming; (c) the targeting of "criminogenic needs"; (d) the responsivity principle; (e) roleplaying and modeling; and (f) social cognitive skills training. The study raised several questions about the adequacy of research on offender rehabilitation and about the validity of many assertions that have been made about the essential characteristics of effective programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agee, V. L. (1986). Institutional treatment programs for the violent juvenile. In S. Apter & A. Goldstein (Eds.), Youth violence: Program and prospects (pp. 75-88). New York: Pergamon Press.
2.
Andrews, D. A. (1989). Recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: Using risk assessments to reduce recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research, 1(2), 11-18.
3.
Andrews, D. A. , & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CAVIC research. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 441-463). Toronto: Butterworths.
4.
Andrews, D. A. , Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically-informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
5.
Ayres, A. , Duguid, S., Montague, C., & Wolowidnyk, S. (1980). Effects of University of Victoria Program: A post-release study. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.
6.
Cullen, F. T. , & Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: Reconsidering the "Nothing Works" doctrine. In L. Goodstein & D. L. Mackenzie (Eds.), The American prison: Issues in research policy (pp. 23-44). New York: Plenum.
7.
Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychology: The rational-emotive approach. New York: Julian Press.
8.
Fogel, D. (1979). "... We are the living proof... ": The justice model for corrections. Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson Company.
9.
Garrett, C. J. (1985). Effects of residential treatment on adjudicated delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 287-308.
10.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. R. (1979). Effectiveness of correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime and Delinquency, 25, 463-489.
11.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. R. (1981). Offender rehabilitation: The appeal of success. Federal Probation, 45(4), 45-48.
12.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. R. (1984). Correctional treatment: Some recommendations for successful intervention. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 34(4), 31-40.
13.
Gendreau, P. , & Ross, R. R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-408.
14.
Izzo, R. L. , & Ross, R. R. (1990). Meta-analysis of rehabilitation programs for juvenile delinquents: A brief report. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 134-142.
15.
Johnson, G. , & Hunter, L. (1992). Evaluation of the specialized drug offender program. Report for the Colorado Judicial Department. Boulder: University of Colorado, Center for Action Research.
16.
Linden, R. , Perry, L., Ayers, D., & Parlett, T. A. A. (1984). An evaluation of a prison education program. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 26, 65-73.
17.
Lipsey, M. (1991). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19.
Morales, S. (1992). Tenerife prison study. Manuscript in preparation, University of LaLaguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands.
20.
Platt, J. J. , Perry, G. M., & Metzger, D. S. (1980). The evaluation of a heroin addiction treatment program within a correctional environment. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 421-437). Toronto: Butterworths.
21.
Porporino, F. , Robinson, D., & Fabiano, E. A. (1992). Application of the cognitive skills training approach in Canada's prisons. Prepublication summary, Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.
22.
Ross, R. R. , & Fabiano, E. A. (1985). Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Arts.
23.
Ross, R. R. , Fabiano, E. A., & Ewles, C. D. (1988). Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 29-35.
24.
Ross, R. R. , & Gendreau, P. (1980). Effective correctional treatment. Toronto: Butterworths.
25.
Ross, R. R. , & Lightfoot, L. O. (1985). Treatment of the alcohol-abusing offender. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
26.
Sarason, I. G. , & Ganzer, V. J. (1973). Modeling and group discussions in the rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 442-449.
27.
Wexler, H. K. , Falkin, G. P., & Lipton, D. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 71-92.
