Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Thirty drug-using burglars participated in reconstructions of past burglaries and were interviewed extensively over a period of 16 months. Unlike previous research with burglars, the informants were ACTIVE burglars interviewed in their own environment. The study attempted to determine whether their decision-making processes were rational and to what extent drug and alcohol use affected those decisions. Their drug use and their criminal activity were found to be inextricably interrelated. Heroin addicts were found to be more rational than previously believed and capable of controlling their drug use to a significant extent. Drug use was found to facilitate the commission of crimes for some burglars. Public policy implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Åkerström

(1983). Crooks and squares. Lund, Sweden: Student Litteratur.

Beck

(April, 1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Special Report. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Bennett

(1986). A decision-making approach to opioid addiction. In Cornish

Derek

& Clarke

R.V.

(Eds.), The reasoning criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Bennett

& Wright

(1984). Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Aldershot: Gower.

Brantingham

& Brantingham

(1981). Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Brantingham

& Brantingham

(1978). A theoretical model of crime site selection. In Krohn

Marvin D.

& Alters

Ronald L.

(Eds.), Crime, law and sanctions. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Brown

& Altman

(1981). Territoriality and residential crime: A conceptual framework. In Brantingham

Paul J.

and Brantingham

Patricia L.

(Eds.), Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Bureau of Justice Statistics (1988). BJS Data Report, 1988. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice.

Easterbrook

(1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.

10.

Faupel

(1987). Heroin use and street crime. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 115–131.

11.

Faupel

& Klockars

(1987). Drugs-crime connections: Elaborations from the life histories of hard-core heroin addicts. Social Problems, 340, 54–68.

12.

Johnson

Goldstein

Preble

Schmeider

Lipton

Spunt

, & Miller

(1985). Taking care of business: The economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

13.

Letkemann

(1973). Crime as work. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

14.

National Institute of Justice (August, 1989). NIJ Research in Action. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice. Cited as NIJ, 1989a.

15.

National Institutre of Justice (March–April 1989). NIJ Reports. no. 213. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice. Cited as NIJ, 1989b.

16.

Preble

& Casey

(1969). Taking care of business: The heroin user's life on the street. International Journal of Addictions, 4, 1–24.

17.

Rengert

& Wasilchick

(1985). Suburban burglary: A time and a place for everything. Springfield: Thomas.

18.

Reppetto

(1974). Residential crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

19.

Scarr

(1973). Patterns of burglary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

20.

Shover

(1971). Burglary as an occupation, Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Illinois. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, 1975.

21.

West

(1978). The short term careers of serious thieves. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 20, 169–90.

22.

Zajonc

(1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

23.

Zajonc

(1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

How Drugs Affect Decisions by Burglars

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References