In correctional settings and in general living, the con cept of "happiness" has a powerful influence on individual expectations and satisfaction. However, the pursuit of happiness can be based on both rational and irrational assumptions. A number of possible paradoxes of happiness are discussed which may, in the appropriate contexts, be worthy of exploration between the therapist and the offender. A heightened awareness of these paradoxes may ultimately increase the likelihood of desirable results as offenders refine their general concepts of happiness into specific goals and strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dreikurs, R. (1967) Psychodynamics, Psychotherapy and Counseling, Chicago: Alfred Adler Institute.
2.
Elliss, A. (1971) Growth through Reason, Palo Alto (Calif.) : Science and Behavior.
3.
Freedman, J. (1978) Happy People, New York: Ballentine.
4.
Haley, J. (1973) Uncommon Therapy, New York: Norton.
5.
Lazarus, A. & Fay, A. (1975) I Can if I want toNew York : Morrow.
6.
Way, L. ( 1977) Friends and Community (personal comments. In: Painter, Deutsch, Overholt (Eds.) Alfred Adler : As We Remember Him, Austin (Texas) : North American Society for Adlerian Psychology.
7.
Woolfolk, R. & Richardson, F. (1978) Stress, Sanity and Survival , New York: Sovereign.
8.
Walen, S.; DiGuiseppe, R. & Wessler, R. (1980) A Practitioner's Guide to Rational-Emotive TherapyNew York: Oxford University Press .
