Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current study investigated variables that are being considered when assigning psychotherapists to individuals convicted of sexual and violent offences. Its main aim is to inform practitioners and researchers alike of potentially beneficial combinations between therapist and client and infer hypotheses for future studies. A mixed-methods approach, combining interviews and a follow-up questionnaire, was employed. Nineteen interviews with forensic practitioners working in socio-therapeutic facilities in Germany were conducted. Relevant matching criteria were extracted from all interviews. 1.) Capacities of therapist, 2.) therapist’s professional background, 3.) (severity of) clinical disorder, 4.) personal fit, and 5.) fit of client into existing groups emerged as top five matching criteria. Directive therapists were viewed as a good match for antisocial or psychopathic offenders. Opinions diverged regarding personality similarity or complementarity in client-therapist dyads. A flexible matching approach may offer unique strengths to enhance treatment outcome. Implications and ideas for future research are discussed.

Keywords

therapist-client-fit matching offender treatment expert interviews therapeutic alliance responsivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

S. J.

Hilsenroth

M. J.

(2003). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(02)00146-0

Baldwin

S. A.

Wampold

B. E.

Imel

Z. E.

(2007). Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(6), 842–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.75.6.842

Bergin

A. E.

Lambert

M. J.

(1971). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In Garfield

S. J.

Bergin

A. E.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 217–270). Wiley.

Beutler

L. E.

Clarkin

Crago

Bergan

(1990). Client-therapist matching. In Snyder

C. R.

Forsyth

D. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology (pp. 699-716). Pergamon.

Bhati

K. S.

(2014). Effect of client-therapist gender match on the therapeutic relationship: An exploratory analysis. Psychological Reports, 115(2), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.02.PR0.115c23z1

Bingham

A. J.

Witkowsky

(2021). Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. In Vanover

Mihas

Saldaña

(Eds.), Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview (pp. 133–146). Sage.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22. http://www.securitepublique.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/rsk-nd-rspnsvty/rsk-nd-rspnsvty-eng.pdf

Carson

R. C.

Heine

R. W.

(1962). Similarity and success in therapeutic dyads. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047778

Cottone

J. G.

Drucker

Javier

R. A.

(2002). Gender differences in psychotherapy dyads: Changes in psychological symptoms and responsiveness to treatment during 3 months of therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 39(4), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.39.4.297

10.

Crits-Christoph

Baranackie

Kurcias

Beck

Carroll

Perry

Luborsky

McLellan

Woody

Thompson

Gallagher

Zitrin

(1991). Meta-analysis of therapist effects in psychotherapy outcome studies. Psychotherapy Research, 1(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503309112331335511

11.

Daniels

R. A.

Holdsworth

Tramontano

(2017). Relating therapist characteristics to client engagement and the therapeutic alliance in an adolescent custodial group substance misuse treatment program. Substance Use & Misuse, 52(9), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2017.1299181

12.

Del Re

A. C.

Flückiger

Horvath

A. O.

Symonds

Wampold

B. E.

(2012). Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance-outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(7), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.07.002

13.

DeSorcy

D. R.

Olver

M. E.

Wormith

J. S.

(2016). Working alliance and its relationship with treatment outcome in a sample of aboriginal and non-aboriginal sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(4), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214556360

14.

DeSorcy

D. R.

Olver

M. E.

Wormith

J. S.

(2020). Working alliance and psychopathy: Linkages to treatment outcome in a sample of treated sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7-8), 1739–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517698822

15.

De Wied

van der Graaff

De Rooij

Scheepers

Hoekstra

P. J.

Branje

van de Schoot

(2020). The role of client empathy in treatment outcome in a sample of adolescents referred to forensic youth psychiatric services. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105301

16.

Diener

M. J.

Monroe

J. M.

(2011). The relationship between adult attachment style and therapeutic alliance in individual psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy, 48(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022425

17.

Dinger

Strack

Leichsenring

Wilmers

Schauenburg

(2008). Therapist effects on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20443

18.

Frick

P. J.

Lahey

B. B.

Loeber

Stouthamer-Loeber

Christ

Hanson

(1992). Familial risk factors to oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: Parental psychopathology and maternal parenting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 49–55.

19.

Hersoug

A. G.

Høglend

Monsen

J. T.

Havik

O. E.

(2001). Quality of working alliance in psychotherapy: Therapist variables and patient/therapist similarity as predictors. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10(4), 205–216.

20.

Horvath

A. O.

Del Re

A. C.

Flückiger

Symonds

(2011). Alliance in Individual Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.003.0002

21.

Horvath

A. O.

Symonds

B. D.

(1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139

22.

Jorm

A. F.

(2015). Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(10), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415600891

23.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

24.

Lee

G. C.

Platow

M. J.

Haslam

S. A.

Reicher

S. D.

Grace

D. M.

Cruwys

(2021). Facilitating goals, tasks, and bonds via identity leadership: Understanding the therapeutic working alliance as the outcome of social identity processes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25(4), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000170

25.

Lutz

Leon

S. C.

Martinovich

Lyons

J. S.

Stiles

W. B.

(2007). Therapist effects in outpatient psychotherapy: A three-level growth curve approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.32

26.

Marsh

S. C.

Evans

W. P.

(2009). Youth perspectives on their relationships with staff in juvenile correction settings and perceived likelihood of success on release. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204008324484

27.

Martin

D. J.

Garske

J. P.

Davis

M. K.

(2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.68.3.438

28.

Martinson

(1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.

29.

McMurran

(2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X278326

30.

Miller

W. R.

Benefield

R. G.

Tonigan

J. S.

(2001). Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: A controlled comparison of two therapist styles. In Hill

C. E.

(Ed.), Helping skills: The empirical foundation (pp. 243–255). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10412-014

31.

Moosburner

(2021). Sozialtherapie im Strafvollzug 2021: Ergebnisübersicht der Stichtagserhebung zum 31.03.2021. Berichte und Materialien (BM-Online): Vol. 28. Kriminologische Zentralstelle. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:2378-opus-2206

32.

O’Brien

B. C.

Harris

I. B.

Beckman

T. J.

Reed

D. A.

Cook

D. A.

(2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

33.

Paul

G. L.

(1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31(2), 109–118.

34.

Ross

E. C.

Polaschek

D. L.

Ward

(2008). The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.003

35.

Sachse

(2016). Therapeutische Beziehungsgestaltung. Hogrefe.

36.

Serran

Fernandez

Marshall

W. L.

Mann

R. E.

(2003). Process issues in treatment: Application to sexual offender programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(4), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.368

37.

Stiles

W. B.

(2009). Responsiveness as an obstacle for psychotherapy outcome research: It’s worse than you think. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 16(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01148.x

38.

Taber

B. J.

Leibert

T. W.

Agaskar

V. R.

(2011). Relationships among client-therapist personality congruence, working alliance, and therapeutic outcome. Psychotherapy, 48(4), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022066

39.

Taft

C. T.

Murphy

C. M.

Musser

P. H.

Remington

N. A.

(2004). Personality, interpersonal, and motivational predictors of the working alliance in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(2), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.72.2.349

40.

Turner

J. C.

(1991). Social influence. Open University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-97487-000

41.

Watson

J. C.

McMullen

E. J.

(2005). An examination of therapist and client behaviour in high- and low-alliance sessions in cognitive-behavioural therapy and process experiential therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(3), 297–310.

42.

Westra

H. A.

Norouzian

(2018). Using motivational interviewing to manage process markers of ambivalence and resistance in cognitive behavioral therapy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9857-6

43.

Wintersteen

M. B.

Mensinger

J. L.

Diamond

G. S.

(2005). Do Gender and Racial Differences Between Patient and Therapist Affect Therapeutic Alliance and Treatment Retention in Adolescents? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(4), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.4.400

44.

Young

J. E.

Klosko

J. S.

Weishaar

M. E.

(2006). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press.

45.

Zlotnick

Elkin

Shea

M. T.

(1998). Does the gender of a patient or the gender of a therapist affect the treatment of patients with major depression? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 655–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.66.4.655

Who With Whom: Matching Therapist and Client in Correctional Institutions

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References