Peer influence is generally understood to be one of the primary predictors of crime and delinquency. It is unclear, however, whether the mechanism that connects peer association, endorsement of deviant values, and delinquent behavior applies equally across different age and sex groups. This study examined age- and gender-specific susceptibility to delinquent and prosocial peer influence using a sample of justice-involved individuals. Based on multigroup structural equation modeling, the author found the nexus among peer association, endorsement of deviant values, and violent delinquency varied across gender and age groups. Among adult male respondents, delinquent peers strengthened deviant culture whereas prosocial peers inhibited that culture. Among juvenile respondents, deviant culture was not inhibited by relationships with prosocial peers. The results for adult females showed no significant influence by either delinquent or prosocial peers.
AaronL.DallaireD. H. (2010). Parental incarceration and multiple risk experiences: Effects on family dynamics and children’s delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1471–1484.
2.
AbrahamsonA. C.BakerL. A.CaspiA. (2002). Rebellious teens? Genetic and environmental influences on the social attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1392–1406.
3.
AbramsL. S.SnyderS. M. (2010). Youth offender reentry: Models for intervention and directions for future inquiry. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(12), 1787–1795.
4.
AdlerF. (1975). Sisters in crime. Waveland.
5.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
6.
AkersR. L. (2001). Social learning theory. In PaternosterR.BachmanR. (Eds.), Explaining criminals and crime: Essays in contemporary criminological theory (pp. 192–210). Roxbury.
7.
AkersR. L.JenningsW. (2009). Social learning theory. In MillerJ. (Ed.), 21st century criminology: A reference handbook (pp. 323–332). Sage.
8.
AkersR. L.JenningsW. G. (2019). The social learning theory of crime and deviance. In KrohnM.LizotteA.HallG. (Eds.), Handbook on criminology and deviance (pp. 113–129). Springer.
9.
AkersR. L.JensenG. F. (Eds.). (2011). Social learning theory and the explanation of crime (Vol.1). Transaction Publishers.
10.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. W.W. Norton.
11.
AugustynM. B.McGloinJ. M. (2021). Reconsidering the “gang effect” in the face of intermittency: Do first-and second-time gang membership both matter?Criminology, 59(3), 419–453.
12.
BachmanR.KerrisonE.O’ConnellD.PaternosterR. (2013). Roads diverge: Long-term patterns of relapse, recidivism and desistance for a cohort of drug- involved offenders (Grant Number 2008-IJ-CX-1107). National Institute of Justice, United States Department of Justice.
13.
BahrS. J.HoffmannJ. P. (2008). Religiosity, peers, and adolescent drug use. Journal of Drug Issues, 38(3), 743–769.
14.
BaronS. W. (2015). Differential social support, differential coercion, and organized criminal activities. Justice Quarterly, 32(6), 1089–1117.
15.
Battin-PearsonS. R. (1998). Gang membership, delinquent peers, and delinquent behavior. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
16.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155.
17.
BoduszekD.HylandP.PedziszczakJ.KielkiewiczK. (2012). Criminal attitudes, recidivistic behaviour, and the mediating role of associations with criminal friends: An empirical investigation within a prison sample of violent offenders. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 18–31.
18.
BrezinaT.AzimiA. M. (2018). Social support, loyalty to delinquent peers, and offending: An elaboration and test of the differential social support hypothesis. Deviant Behavior, 39(5), 648–663.
19.
BrownB. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In LernerR.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 363–394). John Wiley.
20.
BrownB. B.ClasenD. R.EicherS. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 521.
21.
BurgessR. L.AkersR. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147.
22.
CampbellA. (1993). Man, woman and aggression. Basic Books.
23.
CapraraG. V.Luengo KanacriB. P.ZuffianòA.GerbinoM.PastorelliC. (2015). Why and how to promote adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: Direct, mediated and moderated effects of the CEPIDEA school-based program. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2211–2229.
24.
CarsonD. C. (2013). Perceptions of prosocial and delinquent peer behavior and the effect on delinquent attitudes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 151–161.
25.
ChappleC. L.McQuillanJ. A.BerdahlT. A. (2005). Gender, social bonds, and delinquency: A comparison of boys’ and girls’ models. Social Science Research, 34(2), 357–383.
26.
Chesney-LindM.PaskoL. (2012). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. SAGE.
27.
Chesney-LindM.SheldenR. G. (2013). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. John Wiley & Sons.
28.
ClarkA. E.LohéacY. (2007). “It wasn’t me, it was them!” Social influence in risky behavior by adolescents. Journal of Health Economics, 26(4), 763–784.
29.
CochranJ. K.MaskalyJ.JonesS.SellersC. S. (2017). Using structural equations to model Akers’ social learning theory with data on intimate partner violence. Crime & Delinquency, 63(1), 39–60.
30.
CopesH.HigginsG. E.TewksburyR.DabneyD. A. (2010). Participation in the prison economy and likelihood of physical victimization. Victims and Offenders, 6(1), 1–18.
31.
CorsanoP.MusettiA.CaricatiL.MagnaniB. (2017). Keeping secrets from friends: Exploring the effects of friendship quality, loneliness and self-esteem on secrecy. Journal of Adolescence, 58, 24–32.
32.
CoyleC.BramhamJ.DundonN.MoynihanM.CarrA. (2016). Exploring the positive impact of peers on adolescent substance misuse. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 25(2), 134–143.
33.
CuevasC.WolffK. T.BaglivioM. T. (2017). Self-efficacy, aspirations, and residential placement outcomes: Why belief in a prosocial self matters. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 1–11.
34.
DailamyA. D. A. (2018). The study of teenage rebelliousness in James Patterson & Chris Tebbets’ middle school [Doctoral dissertation].
35.
DuncanG. J.BoisjolyJ.KremerM.LevyD. M.EcclesJ. (2005). Peer effects in drug use and sex among college students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 375–385.
36.
EisenbergM. E.Neumark-SztainerD.HainesJ.WallM. (2006). Weight-based teasing and emotional well-being in adolescents: Longitudinal findings from Project EAT. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 675–683.
37.
EstradaF.NilssonA. (2012). Does it cost more to be a female offender? A life-course study of childhood circumstances, crime, drug abuse, and living conditions. Feminist Criminology, 7(3), 196–219.
38.
FarrellA. D.ThompsonE. L.MehariK. R. (2017). Dimensions of peer influences and their relationship to adolescents’ aggression, other problem behaviors and prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1351–1369.
39.
FergusonC. J.San MiguelC.HartleyR. D. (2009). A multivariate analysis of youth violence and aggression: The influence of family, peers, depression, and media violence. The Journal of Pediatrics, 155(6), 904–908.
40.
FormosoD.GonzalesN. A.AikenL. S. (2000). Family conflict and children’s internalizing and externalizing behavior: Protective factors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(2), 175–199.
41.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.
42.
GiordanoP. C. (1978). Girls, guys and gangs: The changing social context of female delinquency. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 69, 126.
43.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolphJ. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.
44.
GiordanoP. C.SeffrinP. M.ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A. (2011). Parenthood and crime: The role of wantedness, relationships with partners, and SES. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 405–416.
45.
HartjenC. A.PriyadarsiniS. (2003). Gender, peers, and delinquency: A study of boys and girls in rural France. Youth & Society, 34(4), 387–414.
46.
HaynieD. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 1013–1057.
47.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130.
48.
HeidemannG.CederbaumJ. A.MartinezS. (2014). “We walk through it together”: The importance of peer support for formerly incarcerated women’s success. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(7), 522–542.
49.
HeimerK.De CosterS. (1999). The gendering of violent delinquency. Criminology, 37(2), 277–318.
50.
JenningsW. G.Maldonado-MolinaM. M.KomroK. A. (2010). Sex similarities/differences in trajectories of delinquency among urban Chicago youth: The role of delinquent peers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(1), 56–75.
51.
JohnsonR. E. (1979). Juvenile delinquency and its origins: An integrated theoretical approach. Cambridge University Press.
52.
KirkD. S. (2016). Prisoner reentry and the reproduction of legal cynicism. Social Problems, 63(2), 222–243.
53.
LattimoreP. K.SteffeyD. M. (2009). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Methodology and analytic approach. RTI International.
54.
LaubJ. H.RowanZ. R.SampsonR. J. (2018). The age-graded theory of informal social control. In FarringtonD.P.KazemianL.PiqueroA.R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental and life-course criminology (pp. 295–322). Oxford Academic.
55.
LayousK.NelsonS. K.OberleE.Schonert-ReichlK. A.LyubomirskyS. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PloS One, 7(12), e51380.
56.
LeBelT. P.RichieM.MarunaS. (2015). Helping others as a response to reconcile a criminal past: The role of the wounded healer in prisoner reentry programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 108–120.
57.
LeveL. D.ChamberlainP. (2005). Association with delinquent peers: Intervention effects for youth in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 339–347.
58.
LeversoJ.BielbyW.HoelterL. F. (2015). Back on the streets: Maturation and risk factors for recidivism among serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Adolescence, 41, 67–75.
59.
LinkN. W.WardJ. T.StansfieldR. (2019). Consequences of mental and physical health for reentry and recidivism: Toward a health-based model of desistance. Criminology, 57(3), 544–573.
60.
LiuL.MillerS. L. (2020). Protective factors against juvenile delinquency: Exploring gender with a nationally representative sample of youth. Social Science Research, 86, 102–123.
61.
LiuL.MillerS. L. (2023). Reclaiming parenthood after incarceration: The nexus of determination to desist, fulfillment of parental responsibilities, and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, XX, XX–XX. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385482311649
62.
LiuL.MowenT. J.VisherC. A.SunD. (2022). Violent victimization during reentry: Prevalence, triggers, and impact on mental health. Justice Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2104747
63.
LiuL.VisherC. A.O’ConnellD. J.SunD. (2022). When post-incarcerated individuals return to high-risk neighborhoods: Staying out of trouble, social withdrawal, and mental health. Crime & Delinquency, 68, 2253–2273.
64.
LoukasA.Ripperger-SuhlerK. G.HortonK. D. (2009). Examining temporal associations between school connectedness and early adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(6), 804–812.
65.
MartinezD. J.AbramsL. S. (2013). Informal social support among returning young offenders: A meta-synthesis of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(2), 169–190.
66.
MatsudaK. N.MeldeC.TaylorT. J.FrengA.EsbensenF. A. (2013). Gang membership and adherence to the “code of the street”. Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 440–468.
67.
MatsuedaR. L.AndersonK. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36(2), 269–308.
68.
McGloinJ. M.O’Neill ShermerL. (2009). Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(1), 35–72.
69.
MearsD. P.PloegerM.WarrM. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(3), 251–266.
70.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (1986). Capitalism, patriarchy, and crime: Toward a socialist feminist criminology. Rowman & Littlefield.
71.
MorashM. (1986). Gender, peer group experiences, and seriousness of delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23(1), 43–67.
72.
MowenT. J.BomanJ. H.IV.(2019). Do we have it all wrong? The protective roles of peers and criminogenic risks from family during prison reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 65(5), 681–704.
73.
MynerJ.SantmanJ.CappellettyG. G.PerlmutterB. F. (1998). Variables related to recidivism among Juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 65–80.
74.
NelsonE. E.LeibenluftE.McClureE. B.PineD. S. (2005). The social re-orientation of adolescence: A neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 163–174.
75.
OsgoodD. W.WilsonJ. K.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.JohnstonL. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655.
76.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (2007). Personal values as a mediator between parent and peer expectations and adolescent behaviors. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 538–551.
77.
PiqueroN. L.GoverA. R.MacDonaldJ. M.PiqueroA. R. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter?Youth & Society, 36(3), 251–275.
PyroozD. C.SweetenG.PiqueroA. R. (2013). Continuity and change in gang membership and gang embeddedness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 239–271.
80.
RadloffL. S. (1977) The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
81.
RosenfieldS. (1980). Sex differences in depression: Do women always have higher rates?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 33–42.
82.
SampsonR. J.BartuschD. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777–804.
83.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41(3), 555–592.
84.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2017). A general age-graded theory of crime: Lessons learned and the future of the life-course criminology. In FarringtonD. P. (Ed.), Integrated developmental and lifecourse theories of offending (pp. 165–181). Transaction.
85.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H.WimerC. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.
86.
SimonsR. L.MillerM. G.AignerS. M. (1980). Contemporary theories of deviance and female delinquency: An empirical test. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17(1), 42–57.
87.
SingerS. I.LevineM.JouS. (1993). Heavy metal music preference, delinquent friends, social control, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(3), 317–329.
88.
StansfieldR.MowenT. J.O’ConnorT.BomanJ. H. (2017). The role of religious support in reentry: Evidence from the SVORI data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 111–145.
89.
SteinbergL.MonahanK. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543.
90.
SteinbergL.MorrisA. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 83–110.
91.
SteinbergL.SilverbergS. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841–851.
92.
StoolmillerM.BlechmanE. A. (2005). Substance use is a robust predictor of adolescent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(3), 302–328.
93.
StrausM. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 49–73). Transaction Publishers.
94.
ThoitsP. A. (1991). Gender differences in coping with emotional distress. In EckenrodeJ. (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 107–138). Springer.
95.
WarrM. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17–40.
96.
WarrM. (1996). Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology, 34, 11–37.
97.
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime. Cambridge University Press.
98.
WeissM. R.SmithA. L. (2002). Friendship quality in youth sport: Relationship to age, gender, and motivation variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(4), 420–437.
99.
WodahlE. J.MowenT. J.GarlandB. E. (2021). The effect of individual characteristics and supervision experiences on the perceived quality of the supervision relationship. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(5), 523–545.
100.
YuenC. X.FuligniA. J.GonzalesN.TelzerE. H. (2017). Family first? The costs and benefits of family centrality for adolescents with high-conflict families. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 245–259.
101.
ZuffianòA.AlessandriG.KanacriB. P. L.PastorelliC.MilioniM.CeravoloR.CapraraM. G.CapraraG. V. (2014). The relation between pro-sociality and self-esteem from middle-adolescence to young adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 24–29
102.
ZweigJ. M.YahnerJ.VisherC. A.LattimoreP. K. (2015). Using general strain theory to explore the effects of prison victimization experiences on later offending and substance use. The Prison Journal, 95(1), 84–113.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
