Sociodemographic and psycho social Differences Between Hate Crime Offenders and Other Non-Bias-Motivated Criminals: Implications for Prison Rehabilitation Programs
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2025
Sociodemographic and psycho social Differences Between Hate Crime Offenders and Other Non-Bias-Motivated Criminals: Implications for Prison Rehabilitation Programs
Hate crimes have severe consequences for the victims and for all members of the victim’s social category. Prison programs must address the criminogenic needs of the participants, especially in this kind of crime, in order to prevent recidivism. This study seeks to understand the role of prejudice and aggression in the execution of hate crimes, in order to design effective interventions for hate crime offenders. Sociodemographic, criminological, and psychosocial variables were assessed in a sample of 33 hate crime offenders sentenced to prison or community service and in a group of 38 non-bias-motivated criminals (n = 71). The individuals convicted of hate crimes have higher reactive and proactive aggression, subtle prejudice, homophobia, and social dominance orientation. The implications of these results for the Penitentiary Administration programs will be discussed.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.
2.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.
3.
AndreuJ. M.PeñaE.RamírezJ. M. (2009). Cuestionario de agresión reactiva y proactiva: Un instrumento de medida de la agresión en adolescentes. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 14(1), 37–49.
4.
Bayram ÖzdemirS.GilesC.ÖzdemirM. (2020). Differences and similarities between perpetrators of ethnic and non-ethnicity-based victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 1805–1820.
5.
BealD. J.O’NealE. C.OngJ.RuscherJ. B. (2000). The ways and means of interracial aggression: Modern racists’ use of covert retaliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1225–1238.
6.
BerkR. A. (1990). Thinking about hate-motivated crimes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 334–349.
7.
BerkowitzL. (1981). On the difference between internal and external reactions to legitimate and illegitimate frustrations: A demonstration. Aggressive Behavior, 7, 83–96.
8.
BrownR. J. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
9.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). Elsevier Academic Press.
10.
Brunton-SmithI.McCarthyD. J. (2017). The effects of prisoner attachment to family on re-entry outcomes: A longitudinal assessment. The British Journal of Criminology, 57(2), 463–482.
Código Penal Español [C.P.]. Art. 510. Ley Orgánica 1/2015, de 30 de marzo, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal. (Spain). https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2015-3439
13.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “Prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789.
14.
CottrellC. A.RichardsD. A.NicholsA. L. (2010). Predicting policy attitudes from general prejudice versus specific intergroup emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 247–254.
15.
CraigK. (2002). Examining hate-motivated aggression: A review of the social psychological literature on hate crimes as a distinct form of aggression. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 7, 85–101.
16.
DevineP. G.MonteithM. J. (1993). The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping (pp. 317–344). Academic Press.
17.
DovidioJ.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In OskampS. (Ed.), The Claremont symposium on applied social psychology reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 137–163). Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
DovidioJ.KawakamiK.JohnsonC.JohnsonB.HowardA. (1997). The nature of prejudice: automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540.
19.
DunbarE. (1995). The prejudiced personality, racism, and anti-Semitism: The PR scale forty years later. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 270–277.
20.
DunbarE. (1999). Defending the indefensible: A critique and analysis of psycholegal defense arguments of hate crime perpetrators. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(1), 64–77.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.AnastasioP. A.BachmanB. A.RustM. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26.
23.
GavrielidesT. (2012). Contextualizing restorative justice for hate crime. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(18), 3624–3643.
24.
GeenR. G. (2001). Human aggression (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
25.
GenthnerR.TaylorS. (1973). Physical aggression as a function of racial prejudice and the race of the target. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 207–210.
26.
GodinetM. T.StotzerR. (2017). Juvenile perpetrators of race/ethnicity-based bias crimes. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 15(1), 21–35.
27.
GómezÁ.BélangerJ. J.ChinchillaJ.VázquezA.SchumpeB. M.NisaC. F.ChiclanaS. (2021). Admiration for Islamist groups encourages self-sacrifice through identity fusion. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–12.
28.
HamnerK. M. (1992). Gay-bashing: A social identity analysis of violence against lesbians and gay men. In HerekG. M.BerrillK. T. (Eds.), Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 179–190). SAGE.
29.
IganskiP.SmithD.DixonL.KeilingerV.MasonG.McDevittJ.PfefferR. (2011). Rehabilitation of hate crime offenders. Equality and Human Rights Commission.
30.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2020). The criminal careers of those imprisoned for hate crime in the UK. European Journal of Criminology, 17, 936–955.
31.
KatzD.StotlandE. (1959). A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: A study o f a science (pp. 423–475). McGraw-Hill.
32.
KayaliL.WaltersM. A. (2021). Responding to hate incidents on university campuses: Benefits and barriers to establishing a restorative justice programme. Contemporary Justice Review, 24(1), 64–84.
33.
LantzB.KimJ. (2019). Hate crimes hurt more, but so do co-offenders: Separating the influence of co-offending and bias on hate motivated injury. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 437–456.
34.
LeippeM. R.EisenstadtD. (1994). Generalization of dissonance reduction: Decreasing prejudice through induced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 395–413.
LevinJ.ReichelmannA. (2015). From thrill to defensive motivation: The role of group threat in the changing nature of hate-motivated assaults. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1546–1561.
37.
LyonsP. A.KenworthyJ. B.PopanJ. R. (2010). Ingroup identification and group-level narcissism as predictors of US citizens’ attitudes and behavior toward Arab immigrants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1267–1280.
38.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616.
39.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R.RayD. G. (2008). Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1866–1880.
40.
MasucciM.LangtonL. (2017). Hate crime victimization 2004-2015. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.
41.
MéndezR. C.SuarezA. (2019). Estereotipos, prejuicios y discriminación. Una mirada desde la psicología social. In ViedmaA.Del ValC. (Eds.), Odio vs. Derechos Humanos: Sociodiversidad, delitos y derechos (pp 46–75). Editorial Tecnos.
42.
MéndezR. C.SuárezA.RuizA.ChiclanaS.DomínguezM.SolísF.TomásS.LoboM.LópezJ. R.Oro-PulidoM.SobrinoR. (2019). Programa Diversidad: Intervención psicoterapéutica para la igualdad de trato y no discriminación. Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias.
43.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR.BaumerE. P. (2004). Dimensions of social capital and rates of criminal homicide. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 882–903.
44.
MillaM. N.UmamA.VázquezA.GómezA. (2020). La aplicación de la teoría del contacto intergrupal al terrorismo. In GómezA.VázquezA. (Eds.), Extremismo, radicalización violenta y terrorismo (pp. 1–30). Sanz y Torres.
45.
MillsA.CoddH. (2008). Prisoners’ families and offender management: Mobilizing social capital. Probation Journal, 55(1), 9–24.
46.
MillsL. G.BarocasB.ButtersR. P.ArielB. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of restorative justice-informed treatment for domestic violence crimes. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12), 1284–1294.
47.
NelsonT. D. (2006). The psychology of prejudice (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
48.
OltraJ.HulutaE. R.FernándezA. R.CuetoE. G. (2017). Desarrollo de un test de homofobia. REMA, 22(2), 16–29.
49.
O’ReillyJ.EichhorstW.GábosA.HadjivassiliouK.LainD.LeschkeJ.McGuinnessS., et al (2015). Five characteristics of youth unemployment in Europe flexibility, education, migration, family legacies, and EU policy. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015574962
50.
PaoliniS.WhiteF.TroppL.TurnerR.Page-GouldL.BarlowF.GomezA. (2021). Intergroup contact research in the 21st century: Lessons learnt and forward progress if we remain open and vigilant. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 11–37.
51.
ParrottD. J. (2009). Aggression toward gay men as gender role enforcement: Effects of male role norms, sexual prejudice, and masculine gender role stress. Journal of Personality, 77, 1137–1166.
52.
PauwelsL. J. R.HeylenB. (2020). Perceived group threat, perceived injustice, and self-reported right-wing violence: An integrative approach to the explanation right-wing violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21–22), 4276–4302.
53.
PerryB. (2002). In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. Routledge.
54.
PettigrewT. F.MeertensR. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.
55.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751.
56.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934.
57.
PezzellaF. S.FetzerM. D.KellerT. (2019). The dark figure of hate crime underreporting. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218823844
58.
PiumattiaG.MossoC. (2017). Relationships between individual endorsement of aggressive behaviors and thoughts with prejudice relevant correlates among adolescents. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 47–59.
59.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
60.
RaineA.DodgeK.LoeberR.Gatzke-KoppL.LynamD.ReynoldsC.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LiuJ. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(2), 159–171.
61.
RedondoS. (2017). Evaluación y tratamiento de delincuentes: Jóvenes y adultos. Ediciones Pirámide.
62.
RojasA.NavasM.PérezP.CuadradoM.LozanoO. (2012). Test de actitud prejuiciosa (TAP): Estudios de fiabilidad y evidencias de validez basadas en la estructura interna en autóctonos e inmigrantes. Anales de Psicología, 28(3), 922–928.
63.
RoxellL. (2011). Hate, threats, and violence. A register study of persons suspected of hate crime. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 12(2), 198–215.
64.
RubackR. B.GladfelterA. S.LantzB. (2015). An examination of hate and bias incidents in Pennsylvania 1999-2012. Center for Rural Pennsylvania.
65.
RuedaJ. F.NavasM. (1996). Hacia una evaluación de las nuevas formas de prejuicio racial: las actitudes sutiles del racismo (Towards an evaluation of new forms of racial prejudice: The subtle attitudes of racism). Revista de Psicología Social, 11(2), 131–149.
SherifM. (1966). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
68.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies on intergroup relations. Harper.
69.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.FedericoC. M.PrattoF. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), Psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307–331). Cambridge University Press.
70.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social Dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. University Press.
71.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2004). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In J. JostSidaniusJ.Political psychology (pp. 315–332). Psychology Press.
72.
Silvan-FerreroM. P.BustillosA. (2007). Adaptation of the social dominance orientation scale into Spanish: Validation of group-based dominance and opposition to equality as underlying factors. International Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 3–15.
73.
StaigerI. (2009). Restorative justice and victims of terrorism. In LetschertR.PembertonA.StaigerI. (Eds.), Assisting victims of terrorism (pp. 267–337). Springer.
74.
SternbergR. J.SternbergK. (2008). The nature of hate. Cambridge University Press.
75.
SwimJ. K.AikinK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
76.
TajfelH. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In TurnerJ. C.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 144–167). Basil Blackwell.
77.
ThomsenL.GreenE. G.SidaniusJ. (2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1455–1464.
78.
Van DoornJ. (2018). Anger, feelings of revenge, and hate. Emotion Review, 10(4), 321–322.
VerdugoM.JenaroC.AriasB. (1995). Actitudes sociales y profesionales hacia las personas con discapacidad: estrategias de evaluación e intervención. En Verdugo, M. & Aguado, A. (Dir.). Personas con discapacidad. Perspectivas psicopedagógicas y rehabilitadoras (pp. 79-143). Siglo XXI.
81.
WaltersM. A. (2014). Hate crime and restorative justice: Exploring causes, repairing harm. Oxford University Press.
82.
WaltersM. A.BrownR.WiedlitzkaS. (2016). Causes and motivations of hate crime. Equality and Human Rights Commission.
83.
WaltersM. A.Krasodomski-JonesA. (2018). Patterns of hate crime: Who, what, when and where? (Project Report). DEMOS.
84.
WilliamsonH.De BuckA.PauwelsL.JR. (2021). Perceived injustice, perceived group threat and self-reported right-wing violence: An integrated approach. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 104(3), 203–216.
85.
WilsonT. D.LindseyS.SchoolerT. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.
