The United States is releasing more individuals from prisons than ever before. However, returning citizens face numerous challenges transitioning back into community life and many communities remain ill-equipped in successfully supporting them. This study focuses on transportation as in integral component to the success of returning citizens. Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis (RADaR technique) is applied to interviews (n = 15) with individuals having returned to their community about the impact of transportation on their reentry. Analysis resulted in three primary themes; interviewees reinforced existing knowledge of the issues with transportation disadvantage, transportation is an extension of freedom, and transportation is directly connected to reentry success. These findings suggest a tiered structure of transportation freedom for returning citizens. This model of transportation will aid future researchers and policymakers in considering how to better resource returning citizens to maximize their success.
AlperM.DuroseM. R.MarkmanJ. (2018). 2018 update on prisoner recidivism: A 9-year follow-up period (2005-2014). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
2.
BegunA. L.EarlyT. J.HodgeA. (2016). Mental health and substance abuse service engagement by men and women during community reentry following incarceration. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0632-2
3.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections.
4.
BohmertM. N. (2016). The role of transportation disadvantage for women on community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1522–1540.
5.
BowmanE. L.ElyK. (2017). Examining the predictors of parole release in a rural jail population. The Prison Journal, 97, 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517728868
CozartA. M. (2017). Transportation matters: Closing the chasm between housing and transportation to foster communities of opportunity for all. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 25(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.2307/26408187
8.
El-GeneidyA.LevinsonD.DiabE.BoisjolyG.VerbichD.LoongC. (2016). The cost of equity: Assessing transit accessibility and social disparity using total travel cost. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 91, 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.07.003
HardinJ.TuckerL.CallejasL. (2001). Assessment of operational barriers and impediments to transit use: Transit information and scheduling for major activity centers. National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida.
11.
La VigneN.DaviesE.PalmerT.HalberstadtR. (2008). Release planning for successful reentry: A guide for corrections, service providers, and community groups. Urban Institute: Justice Policy Center.
LitmanT. (2011). Measuring transportation: Traffic, mobility and accessibility. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
14.
MarsuchakL. M.MintonT. D. (2020). Correctional populations in the U.S., 2017-2018 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report No. NCJ 252157). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
15.
MonchambertG.de PalmaA. (2014). Public transport reliability and commuter strategy. Journal of Urban Economics, 81, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.02.001
16.
MoraniN. M.WikoffN.LinhorstD. M.BrattonS. (2011). A description of the self-identified needs, service expenditures, and social outcomes of participants of a prisoner-reentry program. The Prison Journal, 91, 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511409896
17.
MorashM. (2010). Women on probation and parole. Northeastern University Press.
18.
MowenT. J.StansfieldR.BomanJ. H. (2019). Family matters: Moving beyond “if” family support matters to “why” family support matters during reentry from prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(4), 483–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818820902
19.
NhanJ.BowenK.PolzerK. (2017). The reentry labyrinth: The anatomy of a reentry services network. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2016.1257533
20.
NordbergA.DavisJ. B.LeatS. R.MattinglyS.KeatonC.MitchellM. B. (2021a). Transportation barriers to successful reentry among returning citizens: A qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis. The Prison Journal, 101(4), 488–506. https://doi/10.1177/00328855211029894
21.
NordbergA.DavisJ. B.PatelM.MattinglyS.LeatS. R. (2021b). Towards reentry mobilities assemblage: An exploration of transportation and obligation among returning citizens [Manuscript submitted for publication]. School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington.
22.
PendallR.HayesC.GeorgeA.McDadeZ.DawkinsC.JeonJ. S.SmartM. (2014). Driving to opportunity: Understanding the links among transportation access, residential outcomes. The Urban Institute, National Center for Smart Growth at University of MD, and Institute of Transportation Studies at UCLA. http://www.urban.org/publications/413078.html
23.
Pew Charitable Trust. (2011). Pew center on the states. State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons. Pew Charitable Trust.
24.
Prison Policy Initiative. (2018). The whole pie. Prison Policy Initiative.
25.
RaphaelS. (2011). Incarceration and prisoner reentry in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 635, 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716210393321
26.
SolomonJ.TitheridgeH. (2006). Accessibility indicators and the policy goal of the reduction of transport-related social exclusion. University College London.
27.
State Department of Criminal Justice. (2018). Statistical report. State Department of Criminal Justice.
28.
SungH. E.MahoneyA. M.MellowJ. (2011). Substance abuse treatment gap among adult parolees: Prevalence, correlates, and barriers. Criminal Justice Review, 36, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016810389808
WalkerA.HempelL.UnnithanN. P.PogrebinM. R. (2014). Parole reentry and social capital: The centrality of homelessness. Journal of Poverty, 18, 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2014.923962
33.
WardK. C.MerloA. V. (2016). Rural jail reentry and mental health: Identifying challenges for offenders and professionals. The Prison Journal, 96, 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515605473
34.
WatkinsD. C. (2017). Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: The “RADaR” technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917712131
35.
WilsonJ. A.CheryachukinY.DavisR. C.DauphineeJ.HopeR.GehiK. (2005). Smoothing the path from prison to home: An evaluation of the project Greenlight transitional services demonstration program. Vera Institute of Justice.
