Social support appears to be important in improving outcomes for incarcerated individuals during the reentry process not only in terms of general wellbeing but also in gaining employment and avoiding recidivism. Mentoring programs have become increasingly popular interventions that are intended to provide such support during reentry. However, research on mentoring programs is limited and tends to focus solely on the programs’ impact on recidivism, a distal outcome. Through the use of semi-structured, in-depth interviews, this qualitative study focuses on more proximal outcomes, exploring how reentering individuals who are receiving volunteer mentoring through a transitional housing program define successful reentry and perceive the value of different types of support they received from their mentors. Participants identified several indicators of successful reentry and discussed the types of support that were helpful, harmful, or absent. Implications for practice and areas for future research are discussed.
AjrouchK. J.ReisineS.LimS.SohnW.IsmailA. (2010). Perceived everyday discrimination and psychological distress: Does social support matter?Ethnicity and Health, 15(4), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2010.484050
2.
AnfaraV. A.BrownK. M.MangioneT. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x031007028
3.
BahrS. J.HarrisL.FisherJ. K.Harker ArmstrongA. (2010). Successful reentry: What differentiates successful and unsuccessful parolees?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09342435
4.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Chestnut Hill Enterprises.
5.
BomanJ. H.MowenT. J. (2017). Building the ties that bind, breaking the ties that don’t: Family support, criminal peers, and reentry success. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(3), 753–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12307
6.
BragaA. A.PiehlA. M.HureauD. (2009). Controlling violent offenders released to the community: An evaluation of the Boston Reentry Initiative. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 411–436.
7.
BrownM.RossS. (2010). Assisting and supporting women released from prison: Is mentoring the answer?Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2010.12035883
8.
BuckG. (2018). The core conditions of peer mentoring. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 18(2), 190–206.
9.
BurrisS. W.MillerJ. M. (2017). Second chance act. In SchreckC. J.LeiberM.MillerH. V.WelchK. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of juvenile delinquency and justice (pp. 1–4). Wiley-Blackwell.
10.
CohenS.Janicki-DevertsD. (2009). Can we improve our physical health by altering our social networks?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01141.x
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. SAGE Publications, Inc.
12.
DodgeK. A.DishionT. J.LansfordJ. E. (2007). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. Guilford Press.
13.
DuroseM. R.CooperA. D.SnyderH. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14.
EddyJ. M.MartinezC. R.JrGrossmanJ. BCearleyJ. JHerreraDWheelerA. CRempelJSFoneyDGauJMBurrastonBOHarachiTWHaggertyKPSeeleyJR. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of a long-term professional mentoring program for children at risk: Outcomes across the first 5 years. Prevention Science, 18(8), 899–910.
15.
FahmyC.WallaceD. (2019). The influence of familial social support on physical health during reentry. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(12), 1738–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819870268
16.
GirardL.WormithJ. S. (2004). The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Ontario revision on general and violent recidivism among various offender groups. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 150–181.
HucklesbyA.WincupE. (2014). Assistance, support and monitoring? The paradoxes of mentoring adults in the criminal justice system. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279413001013
19.
HughesT. A.WilsonD. J. (2003). Reentry trends in the United States. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
20.
Johnson ListwanS.ColvinM.HanleyD.FlanneryD. (2010). Victimization, social support, and psychological well-being: A study of recently released prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1140–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810376338
21.
JoliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2007). A rapid evidence assessment of the impact of mentoring on re-offending: A summary. Home Office.
22.
KaebleD. (2018). Time served in prison: 2016. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
23.
KjellstrandJ.ClarkM.CafferyC.SmithJ.EddyJ. M. (2021). Reentering the community after prison: Perspectives on the role and importance of social support. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 176–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09596-4
24.
La VigneN. G.ShollenbergerT. L.DebusS. A. (2009). One year out: Tracking the experiences of male prisoners returning to Houston, Texas. The Urban Institute.
25.
MartinezD. J.AbramsL. S. (2013). Informal social support among returning young offenders: A metasynthesis of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11428203
26.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
27.
MillerJ. M.BarnesJ. C.MillerH. V.McKinnonL. (2013). Exploring the link between mentoring program structure & success rates: Results from a national survey. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9188-9
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
30.
RookK. S. (1990). Parallels in the study of social support and social strain. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.1.118
31.
RuegerS. Y.MaleckiC. K.PyunY.AycockC.CoyleS. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(10), 1017–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000058
StromJ. L.EgedeL. E. (2012). The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Current Diabetes Reports, 12(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-012-0317-0
34.
SweeneyA.GreenwoodK. E.WilliamsS.WykesT.RoseD. S. (2013). Hearing the voices of service user researchers in collaborative qualitative data analysis: The case for multiple coding. Health Expectations, 16, e89–e99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00810.x
35.
TaylorC. J. (2016). The family’s role in the reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals: The direct effects of emotional support. The Prison Journal, 96(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516635085
36.
ThoitsP. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 53–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626957
37.
ThoitsP. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592
38.
TravisJ. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. The Urban Institute.
39.
TravisJ.WesternB.RedburnF. S. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. National Academic Press.
40.
VisherC.CourtneyS. M. (2007). One year out: Experiences of prisoners returning to Cleveland. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
41.
VisherC. A.KnightC. R.ChalfinA.RomanJ. K. (2009). The impact of marital and relationship status on social outcomes for returning prisoners. The Urban Institute.
