Although solitude is found to be undesirable to many, systematic practice of it can yield positive psychological outcomes. This mixed-method study explored the process and influence of solitude as a behavioral intervention among youths in a therapeutic community in Hong Kong. Qualitative interviews with 43 youths (67.4% male, mean age = 18.3) revealed that solitude facilitated growth in their sense of personal responsibility, increased perspective-taking, increased respect for rules, change in life attitudes, and growth in consideration of future consequences. A two-wave prospective study (n = 79, 82.3% male, mean age = 17.4) further demonstrated perceived meaningfulness in solitude predicted an increase in consideration of future consequences, but not in other types of behavioral intervention. This study preliminarily demonstrated solitude has beneficial outcomes among high-risk youths, and meaning-making can facilitate this relationship.
AdamsJ.NettleD. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(1), 83–105.
2.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (1982). Applied behavior analysis for teachers: Influencing student performance. Charles E.
3.
ApplegateB. K.SmithH. P.SitrenA. H.Fariello SpringerN. (2009). From the inside: The meaning of probation to probationers. Criminal Justice Review, 34(1), 80–95.
4.
BarbourJ. D. (2014). A view from religious studies: Solitude and spirituality. In CoplanR. J.BowkerJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 557–571). Wiley-Blackwell.
5.
BlankenshipT.BenderW. N. (2007). Widely used disciplinary options for aggressive kids: Are the current approaches effective?Journal of American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 4(5), 4–26.
6.
BrownG.McDowellR. L.SmithJ. (1981). Educating adolescents with behavior disorders. C. E. Merrill Publishing Company.
7.
CaspiA.HenryB.McGeeR. O.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A. (1995). Temperamental origins of child and adolescent behavior problems: From age three to age fifteen. Child Development, 66(1), 55–68.
8.
ChanA. S. C. (2012). As it is?!Christian Zheng Sheng Association.
9.
CoplanR. J.BowkerJ. C. (2014). All alone: Multiple perspectives on the study of solitude. In CoplanR. J.BowkerJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 3–13). Wiley-Blackwell.
10.
CrespiT. D. (1988). Effectiveness of time-out: A comparison of psychiatric, correctional and day-treatment programs. Adolescence, 23(92), 805–811.
11.
de ValkS.van der HelmG. H. P.BeldM.SchaftenaarP.KuiperC.StamsG. J. J. M. (2015). Does punishment in secure residential youth care work? An overview of the evidence. Journal of Children’s Services, 10(1), 3–16.
12.
FabianoG. A.PelhamW. E.ManosM. J.GnagyE. M.ChronisA. M.OnyangoA. N.Lopez-WilliamsA.Burrows-MacLeanL.ColesE. K.MeichenbaumD. L.CasertaD. A.SwainS. (2004). An evaluation of three time-out procedures for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Therapy, 35(3), 449–469.
13.
FisherH.ErasmusA. C.ViljoenA. T. (2016). Young adults’ consideration of their food choices a propos consequences for their future health. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40, 475–483.
14.
GalanakiE. P. (2013). Solitude in children and adolescents: A review of the research literature. Psychology and Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 50(3–4), 79–88.
15.
GoldnerL.MayselessO. (2009). The quality of mentoring relationships and mentoring success. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(10), 1339–1350.
16.
GrayJ. R. (1999). A bias toward short-term thinking in threat-related negative emotional states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 65–75.
17.
HaganB. O.WangE. A.AminawungJ. A.Albizu-GarciaC. E.ZallerN.NyamuS.ShavitS.DelucaJ.FoxA. D. (2018). History of solitary confinement is associated with post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among individuals recently released from prison. Journal of Urban Health, 95(2), 141–148.
18.
HarrisK. R. (1985). Definitional, parametric, and procedural considerations in timeout interventions and research. Exceptional Children, 51(4), 279–288.
19.
HarveyS. A.McKayM. T.SumnallH. R. (2016). Adolescents’ reflections on school-based alcohol education in the United Kingdom: Education as usual compared with a structured harm reduction intervention. Journal of Substance Use, 21, 640–645.
20.
HeinrichL. M.GulloneE. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(6), 695–718.
21.
HubbardD. J.PrattT. C. (2002). A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34(3), 1–13.
22.
JoiremanJ.AndersonJ.StrathmanA. (2003). The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1287–1302.
23.
JoiremanJ.KingS. (2016). Individual differences in the consideration of future and (more) immediate consequences: A review and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(5), 313–326.
24.
JoiremanJ.ShafferM. J.BallietD.StrathmanA. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat health: Evidence from the two factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287.
25.
JoiremanJ.StrathmanA.BallietD. P. (2006). Considering future consequences: An integrative model. In SannaL. J.ChangE. C. (Eds.), Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (pp. 82–99). Oxford University Press.
26.
KabaF.LewisA.Glowa-KollischS.HadlerJ.LeeD.AlperH.SellingD.MacDonaldR.SolimoA.ParsonsA.VentersH. (2014). Solitary confinement and risk of self-harm among jail inmates. American Journal of Public Health, 104(3), 442–447.
27.
KazdinA. E. (2013). Behavior modification in applied settings (7th ed.). Waveland Press.
28.
KeoughK. A.ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 149–164.
29.
KrokD. (2015). Religiousness, spirituality, and coping with stress among late adolescents: A meaning-making perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 196–203.
30.
KubanyE. S.WeissL. E.SloggettB. B. (1971). The good behavior clock: A reinforcement/time out procedure for reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2(3), 173–179.
31.
LarsonR.LeeM. (1996). The capacity to be alone as a stress buffer. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(1), 5–16.
32.
LarsonR. W. (1997). The emergence of solitude as a constructive domain of experience in early adolescence. Child Development, 68(1), 80–93.
33.
LarsonR. W.CsikszenthihalyiM.GraffR. (1982). Time along in daily experience: Loneliness or renewal? In PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 40–53). Wiley.
34.
LayJ. C.PaulyT.GrafP.BiesanzJ. C.HoppmannC. A. (2019). By myself and liking it? Predictors of distinct types of solitude experiences in daily life. Journal of Personality, 87, 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12421
35.
LipseyM. W.CullenF. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320.
36.
LipseyM. W.DerzonJ. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–106). SAGE publications.
37.
LongC. R.AverillJ. R. (2003). Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(1), 21–44.
38.
LongC. R.SeburnM.AverillJ. R.MoreT. A. (2003). Solitude experiences: Varieties, settings, and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 578–583.
39.
MaagJ. W. (1996). Parenting without punishment. The Charles Press.
40.
MaxwellJ. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE Publications.
41.
MckayM. T.PercyA.ColeJ. C. (2013). Consideration of future consequences and alcohol use among Northern Irish adolescents. Journal of Substance Use, 18(5), 377–391.
42.
ModeckiK. L. (2008). Addressing gaps in the maturity of judgment literature: Age differences and delinquency. Law and Human Behavior, 32(1), 78–91.
43.
MooreM.DahlenE. R. (2008). Forgiveness and consideration of future consequences in aggressive driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1661–1666.
44.
MurphyJ. G.DennhardtA. A.SkidmoreJ. R.BorsariB.BarnettN. P.ColbyS. M.MartensM. P. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(5), 876–886.
45.
NguyenT. T.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2018). Solitude as an approach to affective self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 92–106.
46.
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301.
47.
ParkC. L. (2013). The meaning making model: A framework for understanding meaning, spirituality, and stress-related growth in health psychology. The European Health Psychologist, 15(2), 40–47.
48.
PetersB. R.JoiremanJ.RidgwayR. L. (2005). Individual differences in the consideration of future consequences scale correlate with sleep habits, sleep quality and GPA in university students. Psychological Reports, 96, 817–824.
49.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.
50.
RappangeD. R.BrouwerW. B.van ExelN. J. (2009). Back to the consideration of future consequences scale: Time to reconsider?The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 562–584.
51.
SchutteN. S.SearleT.MeadeS.DarkN. A. (2012). The effect of meaningfulness and integrative processing in expressive writing on positive and negative affect and life satisfaction. Cognition & Emotion, 26(1), 144–152.
52.
SeginerR.LensW. (2015). The motivational properties of future time perspective future orientation: Different approaches, different cultures. In StolarskiM.FieulaineN.van BeekW.StolarskiM.FieulaineN.van BeekW. (Eds.), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 287–304). Springer International Publishing.
53.
SiuN. Y.LamH. H.LeJ. J.PrzepiorkaA. M. (2014). Time perception and time perspective differences between adolescents and adults. Acta Psychologica, 151, 222–229.
54.
SroufeL. A.EgelandB.CarlsonE. A.CollinsW. A. (2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. Guilford Press.
55.
SteinbergL.GrahamS.O’BrienL.WoolardJ.CauffmanE.BanichM. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28–44.
56.
StrathmanA.GleicherF.BoningerD. S.EdwardsC. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.
57.
StrausM. A. (1991). Discipline and deviance: Physical punishment of children and violence and other crime in adulthood. Social Problems, 38(2), 133–154.
58.
TiceD. M.BratslavskyE.BaumeisterR. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it!Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53–67.
59.
ToepoelV. (2010). Is consideration of future consequences a changeable construct?Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 951–956.
60.
van BeekJ.AntonidesG.HandgraafM. J. J. (2013). Eat now, exercise later: The relation between consideration of immediate and future consequences and healthy behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 785–791.
61.
van Den BosW.RodriguezC. A.SchweitzerJ. B.McClureS. M. (2015). Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(29), E3765–E3774.
62.
WebsterR. E. (1976). A time-out procedure in a public school setting. Psychology in the Schools, 13(1), 72–76.
63.
WhitleyK.RozelJ. S. (2016). Mental health care of detained youth and solitary confinement and restraint within juvenile detention facilities. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 25(1), 71–80.
64.
WilsonT. D.ReinhardD. A.WestgateE. C.GilbertD. T.EllerbeckN.HahnC.BrownC. L.ShakedA. (2014). Social psychology. Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind. Science, 345(6192), 75–77.
65.
WinnicottD. W. (1958). The capacity to be alone. In WinnicottD. W. (Ed.), The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 29–36). Karnac Books.
66.
YellM. L. (1990). The use of corporal punishment, suspension, expulsion, and timeout with behaviorally disordered students in public schools: Legal considerations. Behavioral Disorders, 15(2), 100–109.
67.
ZabelM. K. (1986). Timeout use with behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 12(1), 15–21.
68.
ZandD. H.ThomsonN.CervantesR.EspirituR.KlagholzD.LaBlancL.TaylorA. (2009). The mentor-youth alliance: The role of mentoring relationships in promoting youth competence. Journal of Adolescence, 32(1), 1–17.
69.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.
