The Impact of Life Domains on Developmental Trajectories of Peer Delinquency among Korean Adolescents: A Partial Test of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency with a Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Approach
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2022
The Impact of Life Domains on Developmental Trajectories of Peer Delinquency among Korean Adolescents: A Partial Test of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency with a Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Approach
Agnew introduced a new integrated theory; the General Theory of Crime and Delinquency, in which he attempted to corral the most influential predictors of criminal behavior into more parsimonious propositions of multiple life domains—self, family, peer, school, and work—as well as constraints against crime and motivations for it. This study presents a partial test of the theory using longitudinal data of 2,351 Korean adolescents. A group-based modeling approach (latent class growth analysis) was run to examine direct effects of life domains on peer delinquency as well as mediating effects of constraints and motivation on their relationships. The study identified three subgroups: early onset/decreasing (3.2%), moderate (12.4%), and low/none (84.4%). The findings revealed that the self and peer domains exhibited a positive impact on the early onset/decreasing trajectory group compared to the low/none group with the constraint exhibiting a negative impact. The moderate trajectory group demonstrated that the self-domain was significant but was not rendered insignificant after controlling for constraints and motivations. The study provided moderate support for life domains within Agnew’s new theory for peer delinquency in nonwestern countries.
AgnewR. (2005). Why do criminals offend?: A general theory of crime and delinquency. Roxbury.
2.
AkersR. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Wadsworth Pub. Co.
3.
AndersonE. (1999). The code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. Norton.
4.
AsparouhovT.HamakerE. L.MuthénB. (2017). Dynamic latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 257–269.
5.
BarkerE. D.ArseneaultL.BrendgenM.FontaineN.MaughanB. (2008). Joint development of bullying and victimization in adolescence: Relations to delinquency and self-harm. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 1030–1038.
6.
BennettR. R. (2004). Comparative criminology and criminal justice research: The state of our knowledge. Justice Quarterly, 21, 1–21.
7.
BernsteinD. P.FinkL.HandlesmanL.FooteJ.LovejoyM.WenzelK.SaparetoE.RuggieroJ. (1994). Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1132–1136.
8.
BunchJ. M.IratzoquiA.WattsS. J. (2018). Child abuse, self-control, and delinquency: A general strain perspective. Journal of Criminal Justice, 56, 20–28.
9.
CaspiA.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A.LoeberM. S.KruegerR. F.SchmutteP. S. (1994). Are some people crime prone? Replications of the personality crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32, 163–196.
10.
ChangF. C.LeeC. M.ChiuC. H.HsiW. Y.HuangT. F.PanY. C. (2013). Relationships among cyberbullying, school bullying, and mental health in Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of School Health, 83(6), 454–462.
11.
ChoS. (2021). Modeling the reciprocal relationships between group-based developmental trajectories of peer delinquency and self-reported delinquency during adolescence: An application of interactional theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(2), 234–255.
12.
ChoS.LeeY. H. (2020). Assessing self-control and strain of delinquent peer association trajectories within developmental perspectives: A latent class growth analysis approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 109, 104745.
13.
ChoS.LeeJ. M. (2018). Explaining physical, verbal, and social bullying among bullies, victims of bullying, and bully-victims: Assessing the integrated approach between social control and lifestyles-routine activities theories. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 372–382.
14.
ChoiB.ParkS. (2018). Who becomes a bullying perpetrator after the experience of bullying victimization? The moderating role of self-esteem. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 47(11), 2414–2423.
15.
ChoiJ.KruisN. E. (2019). The effects of life domains on cyberbullying and bullying: Testing the generalizability of Agnew’s integrated general theory. Crime & Delinquency, 65(6), 772–800.
16.
ChungB.KimH.LeeS.KwonK.LeeJ. (1993). Restoring Korean Education from the Bondage of Entrance Examination Education. Nanam Publication.
17.
CochranJ. K. (2017). The effects of life domains, constraints, and motivations on academic dishonesty: A partial test and extension of Agnew’s general theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(11), 1288–1308.
18.
ColvinM. (2000). Crime and coercion : An integrated theory of chronic criminality. St. Martin’s Press.
19.
DongB.KrohnM. D. (2016). Dual trajectories of gang affiliation and delinquent peer association during adolescence: An examination of long-term offending outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(4), 746–762.
20.
EitleD.TurnerR. J. (2002). Exposure to community violence and young adult crime: Effects of witnessing violence, traumatic victimization, and other stressful life events. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), 214–237.
21.
EspelageD.HoltM.HenkelR. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74(1), 205–220.
22.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Univ. Calif. Press.
23.
HongJ. S.KimD. H.PiqueroA. R. (2017). Assessing the links between punitive parenting, peer deviance, social isolation and bullying perpetration and victimization in South Korean adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 73, 63–70.
24.
HorwitzA. G.HillR. M.KingC. A. (2011). Specific coping behaviors in relation to adolescent depression and suicidal ideation. Journal of Adolescence, 34(5), 1077–1085.
25.
JanssenH. J.EichelsheimV. I.DekovićM.BruinsmaG. J. N. (2016). How is parenting related to adolescent delinquency? A between- and within-person analysis of the mediating role of self-control, delinquent attitudes, peer delinquency, and time spent in criminogenic settings. European Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 169–194.
26.
KabiriS.ShadmanfaatS. M. S.ChoiJ.YunI. (2019). The impact of life domains on cyberbullying perpetration in Iran: A partial test of agnew’s general theory of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 101633.
27.
LacourseE.NaginD.TremblayR. E.VitaroF.ClaesM. (2003). Developmental trajectories of boys’ delinquent group membership and facilitation of violent behaviors during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 15(1), 183–197.
28.
LacourseE.NaginD. S.VitaroF.CôtéS.ArseneaultL.TremblayR. E. (2006). Prediction of early-onset deviant peer group affiliation: A 12-year longitudinal study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(5), 562–568.
29.
LeeM.LarsonR. (2000). The Korean ‘examination hell’: Long hours of studying, distress, and depression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(2), 249–271.
30.
ManzoniP.SchwarzeneggerC. (2019). The influence of earlier parental violence on Juvenile delinquency: The role of social bonds, self-control, delinquent peer association and moral values as mediators. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25(3), 225–239.
31.
McKnightP. E.McKnightK. M.SidaniS.FigueredoA. J. (2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. Guilford Press.
32.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology -Beverly Hills Then Columbus-, 39(4), 765–798.
33.
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.. . .CaspiA. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698.
34.
MonahanK. C.SteinbergL.CauffmanE.MulveyE. P. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1654.
35.
MuftićL. R.GrubbJ. A.BouffardL. A.MaljevićA. (2014). The impact of life domains on Juvenile offending in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Direct, indirect, and moderating effects in Agnew’s integrated general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(6), 816–845.
36.
MuthenB.MuthenL. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism -New York Then Baltimore-, 24(6), 882–891.
NaginD. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press.
39.
NaginD. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139–157.
40.
NaginD. S.LandK. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31(3), 327–362.
41.
NaginD. S.OdgersC. L. (2010). Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 109–138.
42.
NgoF. T.PaternosterR. (2014). Contemporaneous and lagged effects of life domains and substance use: A test of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency. Journal of Criminology, 2014, 320486.
43.
NgoF. T.PaternosterR.CullenF. T.MackenzieD. L. (2011). Life domains and crime: A test of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 302–311.
Nylund-GibsonK.MasynK. E. (2016). Covariates and mixture modeling: Results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified effects on class enumeration. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(6), 782–797.
46.
OlweusD. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 35(7), 1171–1190.
47.
PattersonG. R.DeBarysheB. D.RamseyE. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. In Developmental and life-course criminological theories (pp. 29–35). Routledge.
48.
PattersonG. R.YoergerK. (1997). A developmental model for late onset delinquency. In DienstbierR.OsgoodD. W. (Eds.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 44. Motivation and delinquency (pp. 119–177). University of Nebraska Press.
49.
PellegriniA. D.LongJ. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259–280.
50.
PetersonB. E.LeeD.HenningerA. M.CubellisM. A. (2016). Social bonds, juvenile delinquency, and Korean adolescents: Intra-and inter-individual implications of Hirschi’s social bonds theory using panel data. Crime & Delinquency, 62(10), 1337–1363.
51.
PiqueroA. R.MacIntoshR.HickmanM. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick Et Al.’S self-control scale. Criminology -Beverly Hills Then Columbus-, 38(3), 897–930.
52.
RoederK.LynchK. G.NaginD. S. (1999). Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: A case study in criminology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(447), 766–776.
53.
RohM.MarshallI. (2018). A cross-cultural analysis of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 2, 301–321.
54.
SabatineE.LippoldM.KainzK. (2017). The unique and interactive effects of parent and school bonds on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 53, 54–63.
55.
ThornberryT. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25(4), 863–892.
56.
TolanP. H. (1987). Implications of age of onset for delinquency risk. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15(1), 47–65.
57.
TzoumakisS.LussierP.BlancM. L.DaviesG. (2013). Onset, offending trajectories, and crime specialization in violence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(2), 143–164.
58.
VitaroF.BrendgenM.WannerB. (2005). Patterns of affiliation with delinquent friends during late childhood and early adolescence: Correlates and consequences. Social Development, 14(1), 82–108.
59.
WaltersG. D. (2018). Mediating the relationship between parental control/support and offspring delinquency: Self-efficacy for a conventional lifestyle versus self-efficacy for deviance. Crime & Delinquency, 64(5), 606–624.
60.
WaltersG. D. (2020). Prosocial peers as risk, protective, and promotive factors for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(3), 618–630.
61.
WaltersG. D.EspelageD. L. (2019). Latent structure of early adolescent bullying perpetration: A taxometric analysis of raw and ranked scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(4), 754–772.
62.
WatsonP. J.BidermanM. D. (1994). Narcissistic traits scale: Validity evidence and sex differences in narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(3), 501–504.
63.
WilcoxP.GialopsosB. M.LandK. C. (2013). Multilevel criminal opportunity. In CullenF. T.WilcoxP. (Eds.), Handbook of criminological theory (pp. 579–601). Oxford University Press.
64.
ZhangY.DayG.CaoL. (2012). A partial test of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 58(6), 856–878.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
