The prevalence of problem gambling in the correctional system is about 10 times higher than in the general population, but programming for gambling problems in the correctional system is scarce. Examined barriers to treatment for problem gamblers in the correctional system, sex or gender differences, and options for program design. We conducted interviews with 16 experts who had worked with problem gamblers in the correctional system and analyzed the data in terms of themes. For barriers, the experts discussed a lack of awareness about problem gambling, as well as stigmatization and lockdowns. Experts described the content of current programs as equally applicable to both men and women, but that emotional components were more important for women. Finally, the experts had mixed views on whether programming should be integrated with other programs such as substance abuse. Programming implications for this population are discussed.
AdolpheA.KhatibL.van GoldeC.GainsburyS. M.BlaszczynskiA. (2019). Crime and gambling disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(2), 395–414.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
3.
AndrewsD. A.KiesslingJ. J.MickusS.RobinsonD. (1986). The construct validity of interview-based risk assessment in corrections. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 18(4), 460.
4.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22.
5.
BourgonG.ArmstrongB. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3–25.
6.
BrownR. I. F. (1987). Pathological gambling and associated patterns of crime: Comparisons with alcohol and other drug addictions. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 3(2), 98–114.
7.
BrymanA.BellE. (2016). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
8.
BurnsE. (2010). Developing email interview practices in qualitative research. Sociological Research Online, 15(4), 24–35.
9.
CoderreF.MathieuA.St-LaurentN. (2004). Comparison of the quality of qualitative data obtained through telephone, postal and email surveys. International Journal of Market Research46(3), 349–357.
10.
CorriganP. W.KuwabaraS. A.O’ShaughnessyJ. (2009). The public stigma of mental illness and drug addiction: Findings from a stratified random sample. Journal of Social Work, 9(2), 139–147.
11.
CovingtonS. (1998). The relational theory of women’s psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. Female offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions, 2, 113–131.
12.
CovingtonS. S. (2007). Women and the criminal justice system. Women’s Health Issues, 17(4), 180–182.
13.
CovingtonS. S. (2008). Women and addiction: A trauma-informed approach. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 40(sup5), 377–385.
14.
CovingtonS. S.BloomB. E. (2003). Gendered justice: Women in the criminal justice system. Gendered Justice: Addressing Female Offenders, In BloomB. E. (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders (pp. 3–23). Carolina Academic Press.
15.
EganJ.ChenowethL.McAuliffeD. (2006). Email-facilitated qualitative interviews with traumatic brain injury survivors: A new and accessible method. Brain Injury, 20(12), 1283–1294.
16.
FarrellM. (2011). An innovative view from the criminal justice system – a “struggle” for progress “gambling treatment court – a therapeutic intervention in the criminal courts: Its’ origins, implementation, challenges and application [Paper presentation]. Gambling Treatment Court Forum, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario.
17.
FerentzyP.SkinnerW.AntzeP. (2009) Gamblers anonymous and the twelve steps: How an informal society has altered a recovery process in accordance with the special needs of problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 23, 42–65.
18.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
19.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.Jr.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research In Crime And Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.
20.
HawkinsJ. E. (2018). The practical utility and suitability of email interviews in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 23(2), 493–501.
21.
JamesN. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 963–976.
22.
KuoppamäkiS.-M.KääriäinenJ.LindK. (2014). Examining gambling-related crime reports in the National Finnish Police Register. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 967–983.
23.
La PelleN. (2004). Simplifying qualitative data analysis using general purpose software tools. Field Methods, 16(1), 85–108.
24.
LepageC.LadouceurR.JacquesC. (2000). Prevalence of problem gambling among community service users. Community Mental Health Journal, 36(6), 597–601.
25.
LesieurH. R.CusterR. L. (1984). Pathological gambling: Roots, phases, and treatment. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474(1), 146–156.
26.
LorainsF. K.DowlingN. A.EnticottP. G.BradshawJ. L.TruebloodJ. S.StoutJ. C. (2014). Strategic and non-strategic problem gamblers differ on decision-making under risk and ambiguity. Addiction, 109(7), 1128–1137.
27.
MathesonF. I.DevottaK.WendaferewA.PedersenC. (2014). Prevalence of gambling problems among the clients of a Toronto homeless shelter. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 537–546.
28.
May-ChahalC.WilsonA.HumphreysL.AndersonJ. (2012). Promoting an evidence-informed approach to addressing problem gambling in UK prison populations. The Howard Journal, 51(4), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2012.00723.x3
29.
MeyerG.FabianT. (1992). Delinquency among pathological gamblers: A causal approach. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(1), 61–77.
30.
MossC.RoseI.N.QuirkD.O’HareC.FiglerD. (2019). The Nevada problem gambling court mock trial [Conference Session]. 17th International Conference on Gambling and Risk-Taking, Las Vegas, Nevada.
MyrsethH.BrunborgG. S.EidemM. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 561–569.
33.
NavasJ. F.BillieuxJ.Perandrés-GómezA.López-TorrecillasF.CándidoA.PeralesJ. C. (2017). Impulsivity traits and gambling cognitions associated with gambling preferences and clinical status. International Gambling Studies, 17(1), 102–124.
NixonG.LeighG.NowatszkiN. (2006). Impacting attitudes towards gambling: A prison gambling awareness and prevention program. Journal of Gambling Issues, 17, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2006.17.14
36.
NowerL.Eyrich-GargK. M.PollioD. E.NorthC. S. (2015). Problem gambling and homelessness: Results from an epidemiologic study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(2), 533–545.
37.
PerroneS.JansonsD.MorrisonL. (2013) Problem Gambling and The Criminal Justice System. Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
38.
PrestonD. L.McAvoyS.SaundersC.GillamL.SaiedA.TurnerN. E. (2012). Problem gambling and mental health co-morbidity in Canadian federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1373–1388.
39.
PunchK. F. (2013). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd.
40.
RatislavováK.RatislavJ. (2014). Asynchronous email interview as a qualitative research method in the humanities. Human Affairs, 24(4), 452–460.
41.
RobinsonD.PorporinoF.BealC. (2001). A review of the literature on personal/emotional need factors (R-76, 1998). Forum on Corrections Research, 13(2), 20–20.
RufrancosH.PowerM.PickettK. E.WilkinsonR. (2013). Income inequality and crime: A review and explanation of the time-series evidence. Sociology and Criminology-Open Access. 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4435.1000103
44.
RuonaW. E. (2005). Analyzing qualitative data. In SwansonR. A.HoltonE. F. (Eds.), Research in Organizations: Foundations and Methods of Inquiry (pp. 233–264). Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
45.
RushB. R.BassaniD. G.UrbanoskiK. A.CastelS. (2008). Influence of co-occurring mental and substance use disorders on the prevalence of problem gambling in Canada. Addiction, 103(11), 1847–1856.
46.
TurnerN. E.Littman-SharpN.ToneattoT.LiuE.FerentzyP. (2013a). Centre for addiction and mental health inventory of gambling situations: Evaluation of the factor structure, reliability, and external correlations. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(5), 526–545.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-013-9446-1
47.
TurnerN. E.McAvoyS. (2011). Problem gambling in the correctional system: A brief summary report. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 15(10), 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2011.151006
48.
TurnerN. E.McAvoyS.FerentzyP.MathesonF. I.MyersC.JindaniF.Littman-SharpN.MalatJ. (2017). Addressing the issue of problem gambling in the criminal justice system: A series of case studies. Journal of Gambling Issues, 35, 74–100. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2017.35.4
49.
TurnerN. E.PrestonD. L.McAvoyS.GillamL. (2013b). Problem gambling inside & out: The assessment of community and institutional problem gambling in the Canadian correctional system. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9321-1
50.
TurnerN. E.PrestonD. L.SaundersC.McAvoyS. (2009). The relationship of problem gambling to criminal behavior in a sample of Canadian male offenders. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 153–169.
51.
TurnerN. E.StinchfieldR.McCreadyJ.McAvoyS.FerentzyP. (2016). Endorsement of criminal behavior amongst offenders: Implications for DSM-5 gambling disorder. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 35–45.
52.
WelteJ. W.BarnesG. M.HoffmanJ. H. (2004). Gambling, substance use, and other problem behaviors among youth: A test of general deviance models. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), 297–306.
53.
WilliamsR. J.RoystonJ.HagenB. F. (2005). Gambling and problem gambling within forensic populations: A review of the literature. Criminal Justice and Criminal Behaviour, 32(6), 665–689.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
