Recent federal and state-level justice reforms have centered on “legal reintegration” (e.g., permitting expungement for a greater range of crimes and rights restoration). While scholarship has tapped public opinion of this approach, much of it predates recent reentry efforts. We see an opportunity to extend this literature by focusing on a contemporary sample (N = 374) of residents living in Virginia, a state that recently considered such reforms. Results suggest most of the public supports expungement reform, but less than 40% support rights restoration generally, with approval levels dependent on specific type of restoration. Divides are explained by socio-demographic factors, particularly political ideology and race, as well as crime-related views. Implications are discussed.
AlexanderM. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New Press.
2.
ApplegateB. K.DavisR. K.CullenF. T. (2009). Reconsidering child saving: The extent and correlates of public support for excluding youths from the juvenile court. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 51–77.
3.
BakerT.ClearyH. M.PickettJ. T.GertzM. G. (2016). Crime salience and public willingness to pay for child saving and juvenile punishment. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 645–668.
4.
BoboL. D.JohnsonD. (2004). A taste for punishment: Black and White Americans’ views on the death penalty and the war on drugs. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 1, 151–180.
5.
BraithwaiteJ. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
6.
CarsonE. A. (2020). Prisoners in 2018. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
7.
ChiricosT.PadgettK.BrattonJ.PickettJ. T.GertzM. (2012). Racial threat and opposition to the re-enfranchisement of ex-felons. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 13–28.
8.
CohenM. A.RustR. T.SteenS. (2006). Prevention, crime control, or cash? Public preferences towards criminal justice spending priorities. Justice Quarterly, 23, 317–335.
CullenF. T.GendreauP. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (Vol. 3, pp. 109–176). U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
CullenF. T.VoseB. A.Lero JonsonC. N.UnneverJ. D. (2007). Public support for early intervention: Is child saving a “habit of the heart?”Victims and Offenders, 2, 109–124.
12.
Dawson-EdwardsC.HigginsG. E. (2013). Knowledge & attitudes towards felon-voting rights: An examination of the untapped perspectives of HBCU college students. Criminal Justice Studies, 26, 393–407.
13.
DenverM.PickettJ. T.BushwayS. D. (2017). The language of stigmatization and the mark of violence: Experimental evidence on the social construction and use of criminal record stigma. Criminology, 55, 664–690.
14.
DurnescuI. (2019). Pains of reentry revisited. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63, 1482–1498.
FrazierB. D. (2014). African Americans and reentry: The threat of even greater challenges. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 12(2), 140–157.
18.
GarlandB.WodahlE.CotaL. (2016). Measuring public support for prisoner reentry options. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 1406–1424.
19.
Hamilton-SmithG. P.VogelM. (2012). The violence of voicelessness: The impact of felony disenfranchisement on recidivism. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 22, 407–432.
20.
HeumannM.PinaireB. K.ClarkT. (2005). Beyond the sentence: Public perceptions of collateral consequences for felony offenders. Criminal Law Bulletin, 41, 24–46.
21.
HirschfieldP. J.PiqueroA. R. (2010). Normalization and legitimation: Modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminology, 48, 27–55.
LattimoreP. K.VisherC.SteffeyD. M. (2010). Prisoner reentry in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Victims and Offenders, 5, 253–267.
24.
LehmannP. S.PickettJ. T.DenverM. (2019). Public opinion on criminal records and employment: A test of competing theoretical models. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6–7), 995–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719875699
25.
LynchJ. P. (2006). Prisoner reentry: Beyond program evaluation. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 401–412.
26.
ManzaJ.BrooksC.UggenC. (2004). Public attitudes toward felon disenfranchisement in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 275–286.
27.
MearsD. P.HayC.GertzM.ManciniC. (2007). Public opinion and the foundation of the juvenile court. Criminology, 45, 223–257.
28.
MillerB. L.SpillaneJ. F. (2012). Civil death: An examination of ex-felon disenfranchisement and reintegration. Punishment & Society, 14, 402–428.
29.
MoonM. M.SundtJ. L.CullenF. T.WrightJ. P. (2000). Is child saving dead? Public support for juvenile rehabilitation. Crime & Delinquency, 46(1), 38–60.
30.
NaginD. S.PiqueroA. R.ScottE. S.SteinbergL. (2006). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 627–651.
31.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2019). Felon voting rights. Author.
32.
NellisA. (2016). The color of justice: Racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons. The Sentencing Project.
PayneB. K.GaineyR. R. (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 149–163.
35.
PercivalG. L. (2009). Testing the impact of racial attitudes and racial diversity on prisoner reentry policies in the U.S. states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 9, 176–203.
36.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
37.
PickettJ. T.ChiricosT. (2012). Controlling other people’s children: Racialized views of delinquency and whites’ punitive attitudes toward juvenile offenders. Criminology, 50, 673–710.
38.
PinaireB.HeumannM.BilottaL. (2003). Barred from the vote: Public attitudes toward the disenfranchisement of felons. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 30, 1519–1550.
39.
PiqueroA. R.CullenF. T.UnneverJ. D.PiqueroN. L.GordonJ. A. (2010). Never too late: Public optimism about juvenile rehabilitation. Punishment & Society, 12, 187–207.
RobbersM. L. (2009). Lifers on the outside: Sex offenders and disintegrative shaming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 5–28.
RoseD. R.ClearT. R. (2004). Who doesn’t know someone in jail? The impact of exposure to prison on attitudes toward formal and informal controls. The Prison Journal, 84, 228–247.
45.
Secretary of the Commonwealth. (2020). Restoration of rights. Office of the Virginia Governor.
TravisJ. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. The Urban Institute.
50.
UggenC.ManzaJ.ThompsonM. (2006). Citizenship, democracy, and the civic reintegration of criminal offenders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 281–310.
51.
U.S. Bureau of Prisons. (2020). FIRST Step Act. Author.
52.
United States Census Bureau. (2020). Quick facts—Virginia. Author.
53.
United States Sentencing Commission. (2010). Demographic differences in federal sentencing practices: An update of the Booker Report’s multivariate regression analysis. Author.
54.
WelchK. (2011). Parental status and punitiveness: Moderating effects of gender and concern about crime. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 878–906.
55.
WesternB.SiroisC. (2019). Racialized re-entry: Labor market inequality after incarceration. Social Forces, 97, 1517–1542.
56.
WildemanC.WangE. A. (2017). Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the USA. The Lancet, 389, 1464–1474.
57.
WilliamsJ. M.WilsonS. K.BergesonC. (2019). “It’s hard out here if you’re a Black felon”: A critical examination of Black male reentry. The Prison Journal, 99, 437–458.
58.
WilsonD. C.OwensM. L.DavisD. W. (2015). How racial attitudes and ideology affect political rights for felons. Du Bois Review, 12(1), 73–93.
59.
WintemuteG. J. (2017). Firearms licensee characteristics associated with sales of crime-involved firearms and denied sales: Findings from the firearms licensee survey. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3, 58–74.
60.
WongA. J. (2019). Locked up, then locked out: The case for legislative—rather than executive—felon disenfranchisement reform. Cornell Law Review, 104, 1679–1718.
