Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-8
Do Views on Sex Offending Vary by Nationality? A Comparative Analysis of Community Sentiment Toward Sex Offense Legislation in the United States and United Kingdom
Much attention has been paid to the examination of community sentiment regarding convicted sex offenders and the policy that governs these offenders’ behavior. This literature, however, has largely been absent of international comparisons of sex offender community sentiment. The current study seeks to fill this gap by drawing from the results of surveys (n = 333) conducted in both the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). Results indicate that sex offender policy is generally supported in both the US and the UK. Contrary to our expectations, we found that participants from the UK were less tolerant of sex offenders residing in their neighborhoods than participants from the US. Additionally, there is support for the notion that sex offender policy holds a symbolic value for both study locations. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, 42 U.S.C. §§ 16911 (2006).
2.
BlackerK.GriffinL. (2012). Megan’s Law and Sarah’s Law: A comparative study of sex offender community notification schemes in the United States and the United Kingdom. Criminal Law Bulletin, 46(5), 987–1009.
3.
BrannonY. N.LevensonJ. S.FortneyT.BakerJ. N. (2007). Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sexual Abuse, 19(4), 369–379.
4.
BrownS.DeakinJ.SpencerJ. (2008). What people think about the management of sex offenders in the community. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(3), 259–274.
5.
ComartinE. B.KernsmithP. D.KernsmithR. M. (2009). Sanctions for sex offenders: Fear and public policy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(7), 605–619.
6.
ConnorD. P.TewksburyR. (2017). Public and professional views of sex offender registration and notification. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 18(1), 1–27.
7.
FortneyT.BakerJ. N.LevensonJ. (2009). A look in the mirror: Sexual abuse professionals’ perceptions about sex offenders. Victims and Offenders, 4(1), 42–57.
8.
FortneyT.LevensonJ.BrannonY.BakerJ. N. (2007). Myths and facts about sexual offenders: Implications for treatment and public policy. Sexual Offender Treatment, 2(1), 1–17.
9.
GriffinL.BlackerK. (2010). Megan’s law and Sarah’s law: A comparative study of sex offender community notification schemes in the United States and the United Kingdom. Criminal Law Bulletin, 46, 987–988.
10.
HarperC. A.BartelsR. M. (2017). The influence of implicit theories and offender characteristics on judgements of sexual offenders: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of sexual aggression, 23(2), 139–150.
11.
HarperC. A.HarrisA. J. (2017). Applying moral foundations theory to understanding public views of sexual offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(2), 111–123.
12.
HarperC. A.HogueT. E.BartelsR. M. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 201–213.
13.
HarrisA. J.CudmoreR. (2018). Community experience with public sex offender registries in the United States: A national survey. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(3), 258–279.
14.
KernsmithP. D.CraunS. W.FosterJ. (2009). Public attitudes toward sexual offenders and sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(3), 290–301.
15.
KingL. L. (2019). Perceptions about sexual offenses: Misconceptions, punitiveness, and public sentiment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(2), 254–273.
16.
KingL. L.RobertsJ. J. (2017). The complexity of public attitudes toward sex crimes. Victims & Offenders, 12(1), 71–89.
17.
Koon-MagninS. (2015). Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 80–88.
18.
LeaS.AuburnT.KibblewhiteK. (1999). Working with sex offenders: The perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(1), 103–119.
19.
LevensonJ. S.BrannonY. N.FortneyT.BakerJ. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161.
20.
LevensonJ. S.CotterL. P. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49–66.
21.
LevensonJ. S.D’AmoraD. A.HernA. L. (2007). Megan’s law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 587–602.
22.
LevensonJ.TewksburyR. (2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(1–2), 54–68.
23.
McCartanK. (2013). From a lack of engagement and mistrust to partnership? Public attitudes to the disclosure of sex offender information. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 15(3), 219–236.
24.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR.ConnorD. P.PayneB. K. (2015). Criminal justice officials’ views of sex offenders, sex offender registration, community notification, and residency restrictions. Justice System Journal, 36(1), 63–85.
25.
NeuillyM. A.ZgobaK. (2005). La panique pédophile aux États-Unis et en France. Champ pénal/Penal field.
26.
NeuillyM. A.ZgobaK. (2006). Assessing the possibility of a pedophilia panic and contagion effect between France and the United States. Victims and Offenders, 1(3), 225–254.
27.
OlverM. E.BarlowA. A. (2010). Public attitudes toward sex offenders and their relationship to personality traits and demographic characteristics. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 28(6), 832–849.
28.
PayneB. K.TewksburyR.MustaineE. E. (2010). Attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders: Demographic, victimization, and community-level influences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 580–588.
29.
PayneB. K.TewksburyR.MustaineE. E. (2016). Identifying the sources of community corrections professionals’ attitudes about sex offender residence restrictions: The impact of demographics and perceptions. Crime & Delinquency, 62(2), 143–168.
30.
QuinnJ. F.ForsythC. J.Mullen-QuinnC. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25(3), 215–232.
31.
RogersP.HirstL.DaviesM. (2011). An investigation into the effect of respondent gender, victim age, and perpetrator treatment on public attitudes towards sex offenders, sex offender treatment, and sex offender rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(8), 511–530.
32.
SchiavoneS. K.JeglicE. L. (2009). Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(6), 679–695.
33.
Sexual Offences Act (2003). Sexual Offences Act 2003 (c. 42). The Stationary Office.
34.
SociaK. M.HarrisA. J. (2016). Evaluating public perceptions of the risk presented by registered sex offenders: Evidence of crime control theater?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 375.
35.
SwerlingG. (January, 2020). Backlash against Sarah’s Law NDAs: Woman who discovered paedophile neighbour taken to court after being accused of telling neighbours. The Telegraph.
36.
TewksburyR.LeesM. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26(3), 309–334.
37.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E. (2013). Law-enforcement officials’ views of sex offender registration and community notification. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 15(2), 95–113.
38.
WillisG. M.MalinenS.JohnstonL. (2013). Demographic differences in public attitudes towards sex offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(2), 230–247.
39.
ZevitzR. G.FarkasM. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin. U.S. Department of Justice.
40.
ZgobaK. M. (2017). Memorialization laws in the United Kingdom: A response to fear or an increased occurrence?American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(3), 628–643.
41.
ZgobaK. M.CowanD. (2019). Sexual offense legislation across the pond: A review of community sentiment toward the United Kingdom’s implementation of Sarah’s Law. Sexual Abuse, 32(4), 476–496.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
