Examining the Social Organization Practices of Cybercriminals in the Netherlands Online and Offline

Abstract

This study focuses on the organization practices of networks of cybercriminals engaged in serious financial offenses, through a qualitative analysis of the Best and Luckenbill’s sociological framework. The study utilized data collected regarding 18 separate criminals investigations from the Netherlands. The results demonstrate that the participants within these networks operated at various stages of deviant sophistication. Surprisingly, the majority of networks exhibit organizational sophistication based on their division of labor and extended duration over time. In fact, most of this sample could be classified as “teams” or “formal organizations.” Furthermore, in contrast with prior studies, no loners were present and only a few networks could be classified as “colleagues” or “peers.”

Keywords

cybercrime cybercriminal network social organization hacking phishing malware

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

P. A.

Adler

(2005). Self-injurers as loners: The social organization of solitary deviance. Deviant Behavior, 26(4), 345–378.

Best

Luckenbill

D. F.

(1994). Organizing deviance (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Broadhurst

Grabosky

Alazab

Bouhours

Chon

(2014). An analysis of the nature of groups engaged in cybercrime. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(1), 1–20.

Council of Economic Advisors. (2018). The cost of malicious cyber activity to the U. S. economy. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/The-Cost-of-Malicious-Cyber-Activity-to-the-U.S.-Economy.pdf

Décary-Hétu

Dupont

(2013). Reputation in a dark network of online criminals. Global Crime, 14(2-3), 175–196.

Decker

S. H.

Bynum

Weisel

(1998). A tale of two cities: Gangs as organized crime groups. In Miller

Maxson

C. L.

Klein

M. W.

(Eds.), The modern gang reader (pp. 73–93). Roxbury Publishing.

Dupont

Cote

A.-M.

Boutin

J.-I.

Fernandez

(2017). Darkode: Recruitment patterns and transactional features of “the most dangerous cybercrime forum in the world.” American Behavioral Scientist, 61(11), 1219–1243.

Franklin

Paxson

Perrig

Savage

(2007). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of internet miscreants. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) (pp. 275–288). Association for Computing Machinery.

Herley

Florêncio

(2010). Nobody sells gold for the price of silver: Dishonesty, uncertainty and the underground economy. In Moore

Pym

Ioannidis

(Eds.), Economics of information security and privacy (pp. 33–53). Springer.

10.

Holt

T. J.

(2009). Lone hacks or group cracks: Examining the social organization of computer hackers. In Schmalleger

Pittaro

(Eds.), Crimes of the internet (pp. 336–355). Prentice Hall.

11.

Holt

T. J.

(2013). Exploring the social organisation and structure of stolen data markets. Global Crime, 14(2-3), 155–174.

12.

Holt

T. J.

Bossler

A. M.

(2016). Cybercrime in progress: Theory and prevention of technology-enabled offenses. Routledge.

13.

Holt

T. J.

Freilich

J. D.

Chermak

S. M.

(2017). Internet-based radicalization as enculturation to violent deviant subcultures. Deviant Behavior, 38(8), 855–869.

14.

Holt

T. J.

Lampke

(2010). Exploring stolen data markets online: Products and market forces. Criminal Justice Studies, 23(1), 33–50.

15.

Holt

T. J.

Smirnova

Chua

Y. T.

(2016). Data thieves in action: Examining the international market for stolen personal information. Springer.

16.

Holt

T. J.

Strumsky

Smirnova

Kilger

(2012). Examining the social networks of malware writers and hackers. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 891–903.

17.

Holzman

H. R.

Pines

(1982). Buying sex: The phenomenology of being a john. Deviant Behavior, 4(1), 89–116.

18.

Hutchings

Holt

T. J.

(2015). A crime script analysis of the online stolen data market. British Journal of Criminology, 55(3), 596–614.

19.

Hutchings

Holt

T. J.

(2017). The online stolen data market: Disruption and intervention approaches. Global Crime, 18(1), 11–30.

20.

Kleemans

E. R.

Van den Berg

E. A. I. M.

Van de Bunt

H. G.

Brouwers

Kouwenberg

R. F.

Paulides

(1998). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland: Rapportage op basis van de WODC-monitor [Organised Crime in the Netherlands: Report based on the Organised Crime Monitor]. Boom Lemma.

21.

Krasnovsky

Lane

R. C.

(1998). Shoplifting: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33(3), 219–235.

22.

Kruisbergen

E. W.

Van de Bunt

H. G.

Kleemans

E. R.

(2012). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland: Vierde rapportage op basis van de Monitor Georganiseerde Criminaliteit [Organised Crime in the Netherlands: 4th report based on the Organised Crime Monitor]. Boom Lemma.

23.

Lastdrager

E. E.

(2014). Achieving a consensual definition of phishing based on a systematic review of the literature. Crime Science, 3(1), 1–10.

24.

Lavorgna

(2015). Organized crime goes online: Realities and challenges. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 18(2), 153–168.

25.

Lavorgna

Sergi

(2016). Serious, therefore organised? A critique of the emerging “cyber-organised crime” rhetoric in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 10(2), 170–187.

26.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

(2014). Cybercrime and social ties: Phishing in Amsterdam. Trends in Organized Crime, 17(4), 231–249.

27.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

(2016). Cybercriminal networks: Origin, growth and criminal capabilities. Eleven International.

28.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

(Ed.). (2017). Research agenda the human factor in cybercrime and cybersecurity. Eleven International.

29.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

Kleemans

E. R.

Stol

W. P.

(2017a). A typology of cybercriminal networks: From low tech locals to high tech specialists. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(1), 21–37.

30.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

Kleemans

E. R.

Stol

W. P.

(2017b). Cybercriminal networks, social ties and online forums: Social ties versus digital ties within phishing and malware networks. British Journal of Criminology, 57(3), 704–722.

31.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

Kleemans

E. R.

Stol

W. P.

(2017c). Origin, growth and criminal capabilities of cybercriminal networks. An international empirical analysis. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(1), 39–53.

32.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

Kleemans

E. R.

Stol

W. P.

(2017d). The use of online crime markets by cybercriminal networks: A view from within. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(11), 1387–1402.

33.

Leukfeldt

E. R.

Lavorgna

Kleemans

E. R.

(2017). Organised cybercrime or cybercrime that is organised? An assessment of the conceptualisation of financial cybercrime as organised crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23(3), 287–300.

34.

Levi

Doig

Gundur

Wall

Williams

M. L.

(2016). The implications of economic cybercrime for policing. City of London Corporation.

35.

Lusthaus

Varese

(2017). Offline and local: The hidden face of cybercrime. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pax042

36.

Mann

Sutton

(1998). Netcrime: More change in the organization of thieving. The British Journal of Criminology, 38(2), 201–229.

37.

McAfee & CSIS. (2018). Economic impact of cybercrime: No slowing down. https://www.mcafee.com/us/resources/reports/restricted/economic-impact-cybercrime.pdf?utm_source=Pressandutm_campaign=bb9303ae70-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_21andutm_medium=emailandutm_term=0_7623d157be-bb9303ae70-

38.

Meyer

G. R.

(1989). The social organization of the computer underground [Master’s Thesis, Northern Illinois University]. http://csrc.nist.gov/secpubs/hacker.txt

39.

Motoyama

McCoy

Levchenko

Savage

Voelker

G. M.

(2011). An analysis of underground forums. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 71–80). Association for Computing Machinery.

40.

Odabas

Holt

T. J.

Breiger

R. L.

(2017). Governance in online stolen data markets. In Beckert

Dewey

(Eds.), The architecture of illegal markets: Towards an economic sociology of illegality in the economy. Oxford University Press.

41.

Steinmetz

K. F.

(2016). Hacked: A radical approach to hacker culture and crime. New York University Press.

42.

van Hardeveld

G. J.

van Webber

O’Hara

. (2017). Deviating from the cybercriminal script: Exploring tools of anonymity (mis) used by carders on cryptomarkets. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(11), 1244–1266.

43.

Wehinger

(2011). The dark net: Self-regulation dynamics of illegal online markets for identities and related services. Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2011.54

44.

Yar

(2013). Cybercrime and society. Sage.

45.

Yip

Webber

Shadbolt

(2013). Trust among cybercriminals? Carding forums, uncertainty and implications for policing. Policing and Society, 23(4), 516–539.