The objective of this research is to examine the effects of general educational development (GED) attainment in prison and therapeutic community participation on postrelease employment and earnings. The participants are all males released from prisons in Idaho during 2004. The dependent variables are employment and mean quarterly earnings up to 57 months after release. Propensity score matching analysis was used to enhance the equivalence of the comparison groups, with a small percentage of overly influential observations trimmed. Logistic regression was used to examine the effects of programming on employment. GED had no effect on employment. The effect of therapeutic community approached significance. The statistical analyses on earnings used generalized linear models based on the gamma distribution due to the highly skewed distribution of this variable. These analyses found that GED had no effect on earnings and that participation in a therapeutic community had a highly significant effect on mean quarterly earnings.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. L. (2003). Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI–R). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Systems.
2.
AosS.MillerM.DrakeE. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates (Document number 06-12- 1201). Available from http://wsipp.wa.gov
3.
DeckerS. H.SpohnC.OrtizN. R.HedbergE. (2014). Criminal stigma, race, gender, and employment: An expanded assessment of the consequences of imprisonment for employment (Research Report Digest, 15). Retrieved from http://nij.gov/publications/digest/Pages/issue15.aspx
4.
De LeonG. (2000). The therapeutic community: Theory, model, and method. New York, NY: Springer.
5.
DrakeE. (2012). Chemical dependency treatment for offenders: A review of the evidence and benefit-cost finding (Document number 12-12-1201). Available from www.wsipp.wa.gov/
6.
DrakeE. (2013). Inventory of evidence-based programs for adult corrections (Document number 13-12-1901). Available from www.wsipp.wa.gov/
7.
DuweG.ClarkV. (2014). The effects of prison-based educational programming on recidivism and employment. The Prison Journal, 94, 454-478.
8.
DuweG.ClarkV. (2017). Nothing will work unless you did: Predictors of postprison employment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 657-677.
9.
FoxJ. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199-236.
11.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2011). Matchit: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 1-28.
12.
JensenE. L.KaneS. L. (2012). The effects of therapeutic community on recidivism up to four years after release from prison: A multisite study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1075-1087.
Northwest Policy Center. (2001, June). Searching for work that pays, 2001: Idaho. Seattle: Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.
18.
OttR. L.LongneckerM. (2010). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
PettitB.LyonsC. J. (2007). Status and the stigma of incarceration: The labor-market effects of incarceration by race, class, and criminal involvement. In BushwayS.StollM. A.WeimanD.F (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 203-226). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
PrendergastM. L.HallE. A.WexlerH. K.MelnickG.CaoY. (2004). Amity prison- based therapeutic community: 5-Year outcomes. The Prison Journal, 84, 36-60.
22.
RosenbaumP. R. (1995). Observational studies. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
23.
SabolW. J. (2007). Local labor market conditions and post-prison employment experiences of offenders released from Ohio State prisons. In BushwayS.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 257-303). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
StuartE. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1-21.
27.
TylerJ. H.KlingJ. R. (2007). Prison-based education and reentry into the mainstream labor market. In BushwayS.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 227-256). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
28.
UggenC. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65, 529-546.
29.
VisherC. A.Debus-SherrillS. A.YahnerJ. (2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28, 698-718.
30.
WangP. C. (1987). Residual plots for detecting nonlinearity in generalized linear models. Techometrics, 29, 435-438.
31.
WannerP. (2018). Inventory of evidence-based, research-based, and promising programs for adult corrections (Document number 18-02-1901). Available from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov
32.
WelshW. N. (2007). A multisite evaluation of prison-based therapeutic community drug treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1481-1498.
33.
WelshW. N.ZajacG. (2013). A multisite evaluation of based-drug treatment: Four-year follow-up results. The Prison Journal, 93, 251-271.
34.
WesternB. (2007). The penal system and the labor market. In BushwayS.StollM. A.WeimanD. F. (Eds.), Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post- industrial America (pp. 335-359). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
WilliamsD. A. (1987). Generalized linear model diagnostics using the deviance and single case deletions. Applied Statistics, 36, 181-191.
