The subject of this study is an integrative theory of the conscience. According to this theory, conscience is operationalised as a regulatory function of one’s own behaviour and identity, resulting from an interplay of empathy, self-conscious emotions such as guilt and shame, and moral reasoning. This study aimed to evaluate conscience in an adult forensic psychiatric sample by assessing the underlying factors proposed by Schalkwijk. Offenders (n = 48) appeared to show less affective but not less cognitive empathy, less identification with others, less personal distress in seeing others’ suffering, less shame and shame-proneness, and lower levels of moral reasoning than non-offenders (n = 50). In coping with self-conscious emotions, offenders used the same amount of externalising coping strategies, but fewer internalising coping strategies.
ArmstrongR. A. (2014). When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34, 502-508. doi:10.1111/opo.12131
2.
BacchiniD.De AngelisG.AffusoG.BrugmanD. (2016). The structure of self-serving cognitive distortions: A validation of the “How I Think” Questionnaire in a sample of Italian adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49, 163-180.
3.
Baron-CohenS. (2012). Zero degrees of empathy: A new theory of human cruelty and kindness. London, England: Penguin.
4.
BarrigaA. Q.GibbsJ. C.PotterG. B.LiauA. K. (2001). How I Think (HIT) Questionnaire Manual. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
5.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvariniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 751-758.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.StillwellA.HeathertonT. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
7.
BeerthuizenM.G.C.J. (2012). The impact of morality on externalizing behavior; values, reasoning, cognitive distortions and identity. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Drukkerij Zuidam & Uithof.
8.
BesemerS.AhmadS. I.HinshawS. P.FarringtonD. P. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the intergenerational transmission of criminal behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 161-178.
9.
BinderU. (1999). Empathie en empathieontwikkeling met betrekking tot vroege, ernstige stoornissen [Empathy and empathy development with regard to early and serious disorders]. Tijdschrift Clientgerichte Psychotherapie [Journal of Client Centered Psychotherapy], 37, 266-278.
10.
BlairR. J. R. (2001). Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 71, 727-731.
11.
BrugmanD.NasC. D.Van der VeldenF.BarrigaA. Q.GibbsJ. C.PotterG. B.LiauA. K. (2011). Hoe Ik Denk vragenlijst (HID) Handleiding [How I think Questionnaire Manual]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom Test.
12.
BrugmanD.RuttenE. A.StamsG. J. J. M.TavecchioL. W. C. (2006). Manual of the Moral Orientation Measure (MOM). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
13.
BultenE.NijmanH. (2009). Veel psychiatrische stoornissen onder gedetineerden op reguliere afdelingen van penitentiaire inrichtingen [Many mental disorders among detainees in regular wards of penal institutions]. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde [Dutch Journal of Medicine], 153, 1-5.
14.
CimaM. (2016). Handbook of forensic psychopathology and treatment. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
15.
CliffordsonC. (2002). The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations in social functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 49-59.
16.
CohenT. R.WolfS. T.PanterA. T.InskoC. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP Scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 947-966.
17.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
18.
DecetyJ.CowellJ. M. (2014). Friends or foes: Is empathy necessary for moral behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 525-537.
19.
De CorteK.BuysseA.VerhofstadtL. L.RoeyersH.PonnetK.DavisM. H. (2007). Measuring empathic tendencies: Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psychologica Belgica, 47, 235-260.
20.
DeonnaJ.RodognoR.TeroniF. (2011). In defense of shame: The faces of an emotion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
EisenbergN.EggumD. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 57-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In DamenW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 701-778). New York, NY: John Wiley.
23.
ElisonJ.LennonR.PulosS. (2006). Investigating the compass of shame: The development of the Compass of Shame Scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34, 221-238.
24.
EntM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2015). Individual differences in guilt proneness affect how people respond to moral trade-offs between harm avoidance and obedience to authority. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 231-234.
25.
ErnstA. F.AlbersC. J. (2017). Regression assumptions in clinical psychology research practice—A systematic review of common misconceptions. PeerJ, 5, e3323. doi:10.7717/peerj.3323
26.
FazelS.DaneshJ. (2002). Serious mental disorders in 23,000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. The Lancet, 359, 545-550.
27.
FazelS.SeewaldK. (2012). Severe mental illness in 33,588 prisoners worldwide: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200, 364-373.
28.
FinkelE. J.HallA. N. (2018). The I3 Model: A metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 125-130. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.013
29.
FontaineJ. R.LuytenP.De BoeckP.CorveleynJ. (2001). The test of self-conscious affect: Internal structure, differential scales and relationships with long-term effects. European Journal of Personality, 15, 449-463.
30.
GibbsJ. C. (2010). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
31.
HoffmanM. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HoganR. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307-316.
33.
IckesW. (2009). Empathic accuracy: Its links to clinical, cognitive, developmental, social and physiological psychology. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Ed.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 57-50). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441-476.
35.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589-611.
36.
KohlbergL. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
37.
Le SageL. (2006). De gewetensontwikkeling van jeugdige delinquenten in diagnose en behandeling [Development of conscience in juvenile delinquents in diagnosis and treatment]. In Le SageL.SteggeH.SteutelJ. (Eds.), Jeugddelinquentie en gewetensontwikkeling. Conceptualisering, Diagnostiek en Behandeling [Juvenile delinquency and development of conscience: Conceptualization, diagnostics and treatment] (pp. 14-32). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SWP.
38.
LewisH. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
39.
LuytenP.FontaineJ. R.CorveleynJ. (2002). Does the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA) measure maladaptive aspects of guilt and adaptive aspects of shame? An empirical investigation. Personality and individual differences, 33, 1373-1387.
40.
MatthaeiI.StamE.RaesB. C. M. (2002). Psychische stoornissen bij vrouwen in detentie. Een onderzoek bij vrouwen verblijvend op een Individuele Begeleidingsafdeling [Mental disorders in female prisoners: A study in women detained in a Penitentiary Psychiatric Ward]. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie [Journal of Psychiatry], 44, 655-663.
41.
McMahonS. D.WernsmanJ.ParnesA. L. (2006). Understanding prosocial behavior: The impact of empathy and gender among African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 135-137.
42.
MehabrianA.EpsteinN. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543.
43.
NasC. N.BrugmanD.KoopsW. (2008). Measuring self-serving cognitive distortions with the “How I Think” Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 181-189.
44.
NathansonD. L. (1986). The empathic wall and the ecology of affect. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 41, 171-187.
45.
NathansonD. L. (1992). Shame and pride. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
46.
NicholsS. R.SvetlovaM.BrownellC. A. (2009). The role of social understanding and empathic disposition in young children’s responsiveness to distress in parents and peers. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 449-478.
47.
NummenmaaL.HirvonenJ.ParkkolaR.HietanenJ. K. (2008). Is emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy. NeuroImage, 43, 571-580.
48.
PulosS.ElisonJ.LennonR. (2004). The hierarchical structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 355-359.
49.
RogersC. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 96-98.
50.
SchalkwijkF. (2006). Schaamte: een miskende emotie [Shame: A misunderstood emotion]. In OeiT. I.GroenhuijsenM. S. (Eds.), Capita selecta van de Forensische Psychiatrie anno 2006 [Capita selecta in Forensic Psychiatry anno 2006] (pp. 39-56). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
51.
SchalkwijkF. (2009). Empathie: ontstaan en diagnostiek [Empathy: Development and diagnostics]. In OeiT. I.GroenhuijsenM. S. (Eds.), Forensische Psychiatrie en haar Grensgebieden [Forensic psychiatry and its boundaries] (pp. 113-137). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
52.
SchalkwijkF. (2011). Naar een nieuwe definitie van het geweten [Towards a new definition of conscience]. In GroenhuijsenM.KierkelsS.KooijmansT. (Eds.), De forensische Psychiatrie Geanalyseerd. Liber amirocum Karel Oei [Forensic psychiatry analyzed, Liber Amoricum Karel Oei] (pp. 149-157). Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: Maklu.
53.
SchalkwijkF. (2015). The conscience and self-conscious emotions in adolescence: An integrative approach. Hove, UK: Routledge.
54.
SchalkwijkF. (2018). A new conceptualization of the conscience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1863. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01863
55.
SchalkwijkF.EllisonJ.DekkerJ.PeenJ.StamsG. J. (2016). Measuring shame coping: The validation of the Compass of Shame Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 44, 1775-1792.
56.
SchalkwijkF.StamsG. J.SteggeH.DekkerJ.PeenJ. (2016). The conscience as a regulatory function: Empathy, shame, pride, guilt, and moral orientation in delinquent adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 675-693.
57.
Shamay-TsooryS. G.Aharon-PeretzJ.PerryD. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617-627.
58.
SiegelD. J. (1999). The developing mind: Toward a neurobiology of interpersonal experience. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
59.
SpruitA.SchalkwijkF.Van VugtE.StamsG. J. (2016). The relation between self-conscious emotions and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 28, 12-20.
60.
StamsJ. J. M.BrugmanD.DekovićM.RosmalenL.van LaanP.van der GibbsJ. C. (2006). The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 692-708.
61.
StapertW. (2010). De ontwikkeling van het geweten; stand van zaken van onderzoek en theorievorming [Development of conscience: State of the art in research and theory]. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 52, 433-443.
62.
StotlandE.MatthewsK.ShermanS.HanssonR.RichardsonB. (1978). Empathy, fantasy, and helping. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
63.
StuewigJ.TangneyJ. P.HeigelC.HartyL.McCloskeyL. (2010). Shaming, blaming, and maiming: Functional links among the moral emotions, externalization of blame, and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 91-102.
64.
TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
65.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
66.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.HafezL. (2011). Shame, guilt, and remorse: Implications for offender populations. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22, 706-723. doi:10.1080/14789949.2011.617541
67.
TangneyJ. P.WagnerP. E.GramzowR. (1989). The Test of Self-Conscious Affect. Fairfax, CA: George Mason University.
68.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
Van LangenA. M.WissinkI. B.Van VugtE. S.Van der StouweT.StamsG. J. J. M. (2014). The relation between empathy and offending: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 179-189.
70.
Van LeeuwenN. K.ChauchardE.ChabrolH.GibbsJ. (2013). Étude des qualités psychométriques de la version française du How I Think Questionnaire dans un échantillon d’adolescents français [Study of the psychometric qualities of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire in a sample of French adolescents]. L’encéphale [The brain], 39, 401-407.
71.
van VugtE. S.AsscherJ. J.HendriksJ.StamsG. J. J. M.BijleveldC. C. J. H.van der LaanP. H. (2012). The relationship between psychopathy and moral development in young sex offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 655-667.
72.
WalliniusM.JohanssonP.LardenM.DernevikM. (2011). Self-serving cognitive distortions and antisocial behavior among adults and adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 286-301.
73.
WattD. (2007). Toward a neuroscience of empathy: Integrating affective and cognitive perspectives. Neuropsychoanalysis, 9, 119-140.
