The term sex offender carries expectations that include a continuous level of sexual criminal risk and untreatable mental health conditions that govern sex offending behaviors. These role expectations by the public can socially isolate individuals who have been convicted of a crime and the people who love them. This is likely to contribute to negative self-images that can result in loneliness, isolation, and depression, and, subsequently, contribute to discontinuing support for sex offender’s loved ones and reoffending. This article highlights the creation and maintenance of a peer-to-peer social support group for registered sex offenders and their family members that helps combat the effects of “sex offender” labels. This group differs from formal organized circles of support model and traditional self-help groups such as Alcohol (AA) or Narcotic (NA) Anonymous. We review this group’s creation, processes and procedures, and outcomes, including changes in cognition, mood, and affect over time for members in the group.
BaileyD. J. (2017). A life of grief: An exploration of disenfranchised grief in sex offender significant others. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 1-27.
2.
BaileyD. J.SampleL. L. (2017). Sex offender supervision in context: The need for qualitative examinations of social distance in sex offender–supervision officer relationships. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28, 176-204.
3.
BarakA.Boniel-NissimM.SulerJ. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1867-1883.
4.
BlumsteinA.NakamuraK. (2009). Redemption in the presence of widespread criminal background checks. Criminology, 47, 327-359.
5.
BorkmanT. (1990). Self-help groups at the turning point: Emerging egalitarian alliances with the formal health care system?American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 321-332.
6.
BurkeP. J.StetsJ. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BushwayS. D.NieuwbeertaP.BloklandA. (2011). The predictive value of criminal background checks: Do age and criminal history affect time to redemption?Criminology, 49, 27-60.
8.
ChouinardJ. A.RiddickC. (2014). Circles of support and Accountability. Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada: Collaborative Centre for Justice and Safety, University of Regina.
9.
CoddH. (2002). “The ties that bind”: Feminist perspectives on self–help groups for prisoners’ partners. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 41, 334-347.
10.
CondryR. (2007). Families shamed: The consequences of crime for relatives of serious offenders. London, England: Routledge.
11.
CooleyB. N.SampleL. L. (under review). The difference between desistance from sexual offending and not reoffending. Journal of Crime and Justice.
12.
CooleyC. H. (1902). The looking-glass self. In KollockP.O’BrienJ. (Eds.), The production of reality (pp. 126-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
13.
CrockerJ.MajorB.SteeleC. (1998). Social stigma. In GilbertD.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 504-553). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
14.
DumC. P. (2016). Exiled in America: Life on the margins in a residential motel. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
15.
DurkheimE. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (SpauldingJ. A.SimpsonG., Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
16.
EysenbachG.PowellJ.EnglesakisM.RizoC.SternA. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 328, 1166-1172.
17.
GalanterM.KleberH. D.BradyK. (Eds.). (2014). The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of substance abuse treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
18.
GannonT. A.WardT. (2017). Cognition, emotion, and motivation: Future directions in sexual offending. In GannonT. A.WardT. (Eds.), Sexual offending: Cognition, emotion, and motivation (pp. 127-145). Malden, MA: John Wiley.
19.
GavinH. (2005). The social construction of the child sex offender explored by narrative. The Qualitative Report, 10, 395-413.
20.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
GradyM. D.EdwardsD.Jr.Pettus-DavisC. (2017). A longitudinal outcome evaluation of a prison-based sex offender treatment program. Sexual Abuse, 29, 239-266.
22.
HalfhillT.SundstromE.LahnerJ.CalderoneW.NielsenT. M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research, 36, 83-105.
23.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 14, 169-194.
24.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J.LetourneauE.HelmusL. M.ThorntonD. (2017). Reductions in risk based on time offense free in the community: Once a sexual offender, not always a sexual offender. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10(19), 1-16.
25.
HarrisA. J.SociaK. M. (2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse, 28, 660-678.
HendersonP.SalmonH. (1995). Community organising: The UK context. London, England: Community Development Foundation.
29.
JamesW. (1890). The consciousness of self. In
JamesWilliam (Ed.), The principles of psychology (Vol. 1), (291-299). New York, NY: Henry Holt.
30.
JenningsJ. L.DemingA. (2013). Effectively utilizing the “behavioral” in cognitive-behavioral group therapy of sex offenders. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8(2), 7-13.
31.
JenningsJ. L.SawyerS. (2003). Principles and techniques for maximizing the effectiveness of group therapy with sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 251-267.
32.
KarilaL.WéryA.WeinsteinA.CottencinO.PetitA.ReynaudM.BillieuxJ. (2014). Sexual addiction or hypersexual disorder: Different terms for the same problem? A review of the literature. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20, 4012-4020.
33.
Katz-SchiavoneS.LevensonJ. S.AckermanA. R. (2008). Myths and facts about sexual violence: Public perceptions and implications for prevention. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 15, 291-311.
34.
KimB.BenekosP. J.MerloA. V. (2016). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17, 105-117.
35.
KrausS. W.VoonV.PotenzaM. N. (2016). Should compulsive sexual behavior be considered an addiction?Addiction, 111, 2097-2106.
KurlychekM. C.BushwayS. D.BrameR. (2012). Long-term crime desistance and recidivism patterns—Evidence from the Essex County convicted felon study. Criminology, 50, 71-103.
38.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Coping and adaptation. In GentryW. D. (Ed.), The handbook of behavioral medicine (pp. 282-325). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
LevensonJ. S.D’AmoraD. A.HernA. L. (2007). Megan’s law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 587-602.
40.
LevensonJ. S.MacgowanM. J. (2004). Engagement, denial, and treatment progress among sex offenders in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 49-63.
41.
LevensonJ. S.MacgowanM. J.MorinJ. W.CotterL. P. (2009). Perceptions of sex offenders about treatment: Satisfaction and engagement in group therapy. Sexual Abuse, 21, 35-56.
42.
LiebermanM. A.GoldsteinB. A. (2005). Self-help on-line: An outcome evaluation of breast cancer bulletin boards. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 855-862.
43.
LoomanJ.AbracenJ.Di FazioR. (2014). Efficacy of group versus individual treatment of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 6, 48-56.
44.
ManciniC. (2013). Sex crime, offenders & society: A critical look at sexual offending and policy. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
45.
McCallionP.ToselandR. W. (1995). Supportive group interventions with caregivers of frail older adults. Social Work With Groups, 18, 11-25.
46.
McCubbinH. I.McCubbinM. A.ThompsonA. I.Sae-YoungH.AllenC. T. (1997). Families under stress: What makes them resilient. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 89(3), 2-11.
47.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society (Vol. 111). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
48.
MercadoC. C.AlvarezS.LevensonJ. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse, 20, 188-205.
49.
MoP. K.CoulsonN. S. (2014). Are online support groups always beneficial? A qualitative exploration of the empowering and disempowering processes of participation within HIV/AIDS-related online support groups. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 983-993.
50.
MoosR. H.TimkoC. (2008). Outcome research on 12-step and other self-help programs. In GalanterM.KleberH. O. (Eds.), Textbook of substance abuse treatment (4th ed. pp. 511-521). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
51.
NussbaumM. C. (2004). Hiding from humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
OhH.ChungM. H.LabiancaG. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860-875.
53.
PeyrotM. (1985). Coerced voluntarism: The micropolitics of drug treatment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 13, 343-365.
RobbersM. L. (2009). Lifers on the outside: Sex offenders and disintegrative shaming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 5-28.
56.
SampleL. L. (2001). The social construction of the sex offender (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, St. Louis.
57.
SampleL. L. (2006). An examination of the degree to which sex offenders kill. Criminal Justice Review, 31, 230-250.
58.
SampleL. L. (in press). Chapter 6: The public and SORN laws in sex offender registration and notification. In PrescottJ.J.LoganWayne (Eds.), Sex offender registration and community notification laws: An empirical evaluation. Cambridge University Press.
59.
SampleL. L.BrayT. M. (2003). Are sex offenders dangerous?Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 59-82.
60.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
SchoplerJ. H.GalinskyM. J. (1993). Support groups as open systems: A model for practice and research. Health & Social Work, 18, 195-207.
62.
SchoplerJ. H.GalinskyM. J. (2014). Support groups: Current perspectives on theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
SociaK. M.LevensonJ. S.AckermanA. R.HarrisA. J. (2015). “Brothers under the bridge:” Factors influencing the transience of registered sex offenders in Florida. Sexual Abuse, 27, 559-586.
64.
StantonA. L.Danoff-BurgS.CameronC. L.BishopM.CollinsC. A.KirkS. B.. . . TwillmanR. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 875-882.
65.
StrykerS. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
66.
ten BenselT.SampleL. L. (2016). Social inclusion despite exclusionary sex offense laws: How registered citizens cope with loneliness. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(7), 1-19.
67.
TewksburyR.LevensonJ. (2009). Stress experiences of family members of registered sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 611-626.
68.
ThompsonR. A. (1998). Empathy and its origins in early development. In BratenS. (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 144-157). Paris, France: Cambridge University Press.
69.
ToniganJ. S.ToscovaR.MillerW. R. (1996). Meta-analysis of the literature on Alcoholics Anonymous: Sample and study characteristics moderate findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 65-72.
70.
UssherJ.ButowP.WainG.HobbsK.SmithK.StenlakeA.. . . SandovalM. (2005, February). Research into the relationship between type of organisation and effectiveness of support groups for people with cancer and their careers (Report to the Cancer Council NSW). Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
71.
Van GelderJ. L. (2013). Beyond rational choice: The hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 745-763.
72.
WilsonC.BatesA.VöllmB. (2010). Circles of Support and Accountability: An innovative approach to manage high-risk sex offenders in the community. Open Criminology Journal, 3, 48-57.
73.
WilsonR. J.CortoniF.McWhinnieA. J. (2009). Circles of Support & Accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse, 21, 412-430.
74.
WilsonR. J.McWhinnieA.PichecaJ.PrinzoM.CortoniF. (2007). Circles of Support and Accountability: Engaging community volunteers in the management of high-risk sexual offenders. Howard Journal, 46, 6-7.
75.
ZevitzR. G.FarkasM. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Examining the importance of neighborhood meetings. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 393-408.
