This 6-year prospective study is the first to compare two psychometrically sound risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth: JSORRAT-II and MEGA♪. Cross-validated on representative samples of over 500 youth, these measures have cutoff scores, allowing for a more exact assessment of risk. Study sample consisted of 129 male adjudicated adolescents housed in a secured residential treatment facility for sexually abusive youth. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that MEGA♪ Risk Scale was mildly predictive of sexual recidivism over a 6-year period (mean follow-up = 15.6 months)—area under the curve (AUC) = .67; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.52, 0.82]; p < .015. JSORRAT-II was not predictive (AUC = .57; 95% CI = [0.42, 0.72]; p < .297). The study contributes to scant literature on the most contemporary, statistically robust risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth.
AebiM.PlattnerB.SteinhausenH. C.BesslerC. (2011). Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 456-473. doi:10.1177/1079063210384634
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
CaldwellM. F. (2013). Accuracy of sexually violent person assessment of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 516-526. doi:10.1177/1079063213480818
4.
CaldwellM. F. (2016). Quantifying the decline in juvenile sexual recidivism rates. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22, 414-426.
5.
DeLongE. R.DeLongD. M.Clarke-PearsonD. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837-845. doi:10.2307/2531595
6.
DuweG.FreskeP. J. (2012). Using logistic regression modeling to predict sexual recidivism: The Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-3 (MnSOST-3). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 350-377. doi:10.1177/1079063211429470
7.
ElkovitchN.ViljoenJ. L.ScaloraM. J.UllmanD. (2008). Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offenses: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 511-528. doi:10.1002/bsl.832
8.
EppersonD. L.RalstonC. A. (2015). Development and validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offender Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27, 529-558. doi:10.1177/1079063213514452
9.
EppersonD. L.RalstonC. A.FowersD.DeWittJ.GoreK. S. (2006). Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who offend sexually: Development of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II (JSORRAT-II). In PrescottD. (Ed.), Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused: Theory, controversy, and emerging strategies (pp. 118-169). Oklahoma City, OK: Woods ‘N’ Barnes.
10.
EppersonD. L.RalstonC. A.FowersD.DeWittJ. (2009, October2, Rev.). Scoring guidelines for the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool–II (JSORRAT–II). Author. For information, contact: Douglas Epperson, Ph.D., Dean, California Polytechnic State University, College of Liberal Arts.
11.
FagundesM. (2013, Summer/Fall). DSM-IV-TR diagnoses and risk levels of sexually abusive youth. Perspectives: California Coalition on Sexual Offending Quarterly Newsletter, 1, 5-8, 13.
12.
FanniffA. M.LetourneauE. J. (2012). Another piece of the puzzle: Psychometric properties of the J-SOAP-II. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 378-408. doi:10.1177/1079063211431842
13.
GerholdC. K.BrowneK. D.BeckettR. (2007). Predicting recidivism in adolescent sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 427-438. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.004
14.
HempelI.BuckN.CimaM.van MarleH. (2013). Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: What is next?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 208-228. doi:10.1177/0306624X11428315
15.
LovinsB.LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Applying the risk principle to sex offenders: Can treatment make some sex offenders worse?The Prison Journal, 89, 344-357. doi:10.1177/0032885509339509
16.
MartinezR.FloresJ.RosenfeldB. (2007). Validity of the juvenile sex offender assessment protocol II (J-SOAP-II) in a sample of urban minority youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1284-1295. doi:10.1177/0093854807301791
17.
MartinezR.RosenfeldB.CruiseK.MartinJ. (2015). Predictive validity of the J-SOAP-II: Does accuracy differ across settings?International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14, 56-65. doi:10.1080/14999013.2015.1019683
18.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C. (2009). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in protocol assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 2, 124-141. doi:10.1080/19361520902922434
19.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C. (2010). MEGA♪: An ecological risk assessment tool of risk and protective factors for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 19, 734-756. doi:10.1080/10926771.2010.515542
20.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C. (2012). Multiplex empirically guided inventory of ecological aggregates for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents (ages 19 and under)–MEGA♪. San Diego, CA: Author.
21.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C. (2013). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 623-634.
22.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C. (2016a). MEGA♪: Cross-validation findings on sexually abusive females: Implications for risk assessment and clinical practice. Journal of Family Violence. doi:10.1007/s10896-016-9845-8
23.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C. (2016b, May). MEGA♪: Second cross-validation findings on sexually abusive youth. Presentation given at the Annual conference of the California Coalition on Sexual Offending (CCOSO), San Diego, CA. Retrieved from https://www.mega-miccio-fonseca.com/
24.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C. (2017). Family Lovemap, protective factors: Sex, intimacy, and sexually abusive youth. Manuscript submitted for publication. In IrelandC., (Ed.), Violent and sex offenders handbook (2nd ed.). Lyme Regis, Dorset DT7 3LS, Dorset, UK: Russell House Publishing, Ltd.
25.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C.RasmussenL. A. (2009). Assessing children and youths with sexual behaviour problems. In CalderM. (Ed.), Sexual abuse assessments: Using and developing frameworks for practice (pp. 81-107). Lyme Regis, Dorset DT7 3LS, UK: Russell House Publishing, Ltd.
26.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C.RasmussenL. A. (2013). Applicability of MEGA♪: Cross-validation study to youth with low intellectual functioning. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 42-59. doi:10.1080/19315864.2011.650788
27.
Miccio-FonsecaL. C.RasmussenL. A. (2014, May2). MEGA♪: Empirical support for nomenclature on the anomalies: Sexually violent and predatory youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1-17. doi: 10.1177/030624X14533265
28.
Powers-SawyerA. B.MinerM. H. (2009). Actuarial prediction of juvenile recidivism: The static variables of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II). Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=78&type=123
29.
PrentkyR.HarrisB.FrizzellK.RighthandS. (2000). An actuarial procedure for assessing risk in juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 71-93. doi:10.1177/107906320001200201
30.
PrentkyR.LiN. C.RighthandS.SchulerA.CavanaughD.LeeA. F. (2010). Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior in a child welfare sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 24-45. doi:10.1002/bsl.920
31.
PrentkyR.RighthandS. (2003). Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) Manual (NCJ 202316). Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse. Available from http://ncjrs.gov
32.
RajlicG.GrettonH. M. (2010). An examination of two sexual recidivism risk measures in adolescent offenders: The moderating effect of offender type. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1066-1085. doi:10.1177/0093854810376354
33.
RalstonC. A.EppersonD. L.EdwardsS. R. (2016). Cross-validation of the JSORRAT-II in Iowa. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 534-554. doi:10.1177/1079063214548074
34.
RalstonC. A.SakarA.PhilippG. T.EppersonD. L. (2017). The impact of using documented but uncharged offense data on JSORRAT-II predictive validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29, 186-202. doi:10.1177/1079063214548074
35.
RasmussenL. A. (2013). Young people who sexually abuse: A historical perspective and future directions. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 22, 119-141. doi:10.1080/10538712.2013.744646
36.
RasmussenL. A. L. (2015, Fall). A neglected trauma: Exposure to domestic violence, a frequent risk factor for sexually abusive youth. Perspectives: Quarterly Newsletter of the California Coalition on Sexual Offending (CCOSO), 1, 4-5, 14.
37.
RighthandS.PrentkyR.KnightR.CarpenterE.HeckerJ. E.NangleD. (2005). Factor analysis and validation of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J-SOAP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(1), 13-30. doi: 10.1177/107906320501700103
38.
van der PutC. E.van VugtE. S.StamsG. J. J. M.DevokicM.van der LaanP. H. (2013). Differences in the prevalence and impact of risk factors for general recidivism between different types of juveniles who have committed sexual offenses (JSOs) and juveniles who have committed nonsexual offenses (JSOs). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 48-68. doi:10.1177/1079063212452615
39.
ViljoenJ. L.MordellS.BeneteauJ. L. (2012). Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: A meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 423-438.
40.
ViljoenJ. L.ScaloraM.CuadraL.BaderS.ChavezV.UllmanD.LawrenceL. (2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: A comparison of the J-SOAP-II, JSORRAT-II, and SAVRY. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 5-33.
WorlingJ. R.CurwenT. (2001, February). The ERASOR: Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (Version 2.0). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Sexual Abuse Family Education and Treatment (SAFE-T) Program, Thistletown Regional Center for Children and Adolescents, Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services.
43.
WorlingJ. R.LangtonC. M. (2012). Assessment and treatment of adolescents who sexually offend: Clinical issues and implications for secure settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 814-841.
