Research on mass murder is limited due to differences in definitions (particularly with respect to victim count), as well as categorizations based on motive. These limitations restrict our understanding of the offending, adjudication, and outcome patterns of these offenders and can obscure potential underlying similarities to comparable types of offenders (e.g., lone actors or terrorists). To address some of these limitations, this research study, which includes an international sample of 434 cases (455 total offenders), uses descriptive and empirical analyses of solo male, solo female, and partnered mass murderers (teams of two or more) to explore offending, adjudication, and outcome patterns among these different types offenders. While the results from this research study support much previous mass murder research, the findings also emphasize the importance of large international sample sizes, objective categorizations, and the use of empirically based analyses to further advance our understanding of these offenders.
AllenH. (1987). Justice unbalanced: Gender, psychiatry and judicial decisions. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
2.
BatchelorS. (2005). “Prove me the bam!” Victimization and agency in the lives of young women who commit violent offences. The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice, 52, 358-375.
3.
BeckerS.McCorkelJ. (2011). The gender of criminal opportunity: The impact of male co-offenders on women’s crime. Feminist Criminology, 6, 79-110.
4.
Bell HolleranL. L.VandiverD. M. (2016). U.S. homicides: Multi-offenders and the presence of female offenders. Violence and Gender, 3, 27-35.
CheatwoodD. (1993). Notes on the theoretical, empirical and policy significance of multiple-offender homicides. In WilsonA. V. (Ed.), Homicide: The victim-offender connection (pp. 443-460). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
7.
Chesney-LindM. (2006). Patriarchy, crime and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1, 6-26.
8.
ClarkR. (1995). Lone versus multiple offending in homicide: Differences in situational context. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 451-460.
9.
ConwayK.McCordJ. (2002). A longitudinal examination of the relation between co-offending with violent accomplices and violent crime. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 97-108.
10.
CornerE.GillP. (2015). A false dichotomy? Mental illness and lone-actor terrorism. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 23-34.
11.
Criminal Justice Abstracts. (2016). Ann Arbor, MI. Available from http://www.csa.com
12.
DelisiM.SchererA. M. (2006). Multiple homicide offenders: Offence characteristics, social correlates, and criminal careers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 367-391.
13.
de Melo NunesA.BaltieriD. A. (2013). Substance misuse subtypes among women convicted of homicide. Substance Abuse, 34, 169-178.
14.
DietzP. E. (1986). Mass, serial, and sensational homicides. Bulletins of the New York Academy of Medicine, 62, 447-490.
15.
DurkheimE. (1897). Le Suicide: Étude de sociologie [Suicide: A study in sociology]. Paris, France: Alcan.
16.
DuweG. (2004). The patterns and prevalence of mass murder in the twentieth-century America. Justice Quarterly, 21, 729-761.
17.
DuweG. (2007). Mass murder in the United States: A history. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
18.
EliasonS. (2009). Murder-suicide: A review of the recent literature. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 37, 371-376.
19.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2005). Serial murder: Multi-disciplinary perspective for investigation. Washington, DC: Behavioral Analysis Unit, National Centre for the Analysis of Violent Crimes. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/serial-murder
20.
FoxJ. A. (2015). Rampage killings on campus. Violence and Gender, 2, 200-203.
21.
FoxJ. A.LevinJ. (2003). Mass murder: An analysis of extreme violence. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 5, 47-64.
22.
FoxJ. A.LevinJ. (2006). The will to kill: Explaining senseless murder. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
23.
FoxJ. A.LevinJ. (2015). Extreme killing: Understanding serial and mass murder (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
GelsthorpeL.LoucksN. (1997). Magistrates’ explanations of sentencing decisions. In HeddermanC.GelsthorpeL. (Eds.), Understanding the sentencing of women (pp. 23-44). London, England: Home Office.
25.
GilbertP. R. (2002). Discourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8, 1271-1300.
26.
GillP. (2015). Lone-actor terrorists: A behavioural analysis. London, England:Routledge.
27.
GillP.HorganJ.DeckertP. (2014). Bombing alone: Tracing the motivations and antecedent behaviors of lone-actor terrorists. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59, 425-435.
28.
GreswellD. M.HollinC. (1994). Multiple murder: A review. The British Journal of Criminology, 34, 1-14.
29.
GurianE. A. (2011). Female serial murderers: Directions for future research on a hidden population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 27-42.
30.
GurianE. A. (2017). Reframing serial murder within empirical research: Offending and adjudication patterns of male, female, and partnered serial killers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 544-560.
31.
HeidensohnF. (1996). Women & crime. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press.
32.
HickeyE. W. (2016). Serial murderers and their victims (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
33.
HolmesR. M.HolmesS. (1992). Understanding mass murder: A starting point. Federal Probation, 56(1), 53-61.
34.
JensenV. (2001). Why women kill: Homicide and gender equality. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
35.
JuodisM.WoodworthM.PorterS.Ten BrinkeL. (2009). Partners in crime: A comparison of individuals and multi-perpetrator homicides. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 824-839.
36.
KeeneyB. T.HeideK. M. (1994). Gender differences in serial murder: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 383-398.
37.
KellyR. (2010). Active shooter report: Recommendations and analysis for risk mitigation. New York City: New York City Police Department.
38.
KraemerG. W.LordW. D.HeilbrunK. (2004). Comparing single and serial homicide offenses. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 325-343.
39.
LangmanP. F. (2009). Rampage, school shooters: A typology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 79-86.
40.
LankfordA. (2013). A comparative analysis of suicide terrorists and rampage, workplace, and school shooters in the United States from 1990-2010. Homicide Studies, 17, 255-274.
41.
LankfordA. (2015). Mass shooters in the USA, 1966-2010: Differences between attackers who live and die. Justice Quarterly, 32, 360-379.
42.
LankfordA.HakimN. (2011). From Columbine to Palestine: A comparative analysis of rampage shooters in the USA and volunteer suicide bombers in the Middle East. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 98-107.
43.
LarkinR. W. (2009). The Columbine legacy: Rampage shootings as political acts. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1309-1326.
44.
LesterD. (1997). Making sense of suicide: An in-depth look at why people kill themselves. Philadelphia, PA: The Charles Press.
45.
LevinJ. (2014). Mass murder in perspective: Guest editor’s introduction. Homicide Studies, 18, 3-6.
46.
LevinJ.FoxJ. A. (1985). Mass murder: America’s growing menace (pp. 3-7). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
LiebermanJ. (2006). The shooting game: The making of school shooters. Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks.
49.
MenningerK. (1938). Man against himself. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
50.
MessingJ. T.HeerenJ. W. (2004). Another side of multiple murder: Women killers in the domestic context. Homicide Studies, 8, 123-158.
51.
MullenP. E. (2004). The autogenic (self-generated) massacre. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 311-323.
52.
NewmanK. S.FoxC. (2009). Repeat tragedy: Rampage shootings in American high school and college settings, 2002-2008. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1286-1308.
53.
NewmanK. S.FoxC.RothW.MehtaJ.HardingD. (2004). Rampage: The social roots of school shootings. New York, NY: Basic Books.
54.
PollackW.ModzeleskiW.RooneyG. (2008). Prior knowledge of potential school-based violence: Information students learn may prevent a targeted attack. Washington, DC: U S. Secret Service and U.S. Department of Education.
55.
ReissA. J.FarringtonD. P. (1991). Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 360-395.
56.
ScottH. (2005). The female serial murderer: A sociological study of homicide and the “gentler sex.”Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
57.
ScottH. (2008). The “gentler sex”: Patterns in female serial murder. In KocsisR. N. (Ed.), Serial murder and the psychology of violent crimes (pp. 179-196). New York, NY: Humana Press.
58.
ScottH.FlemingK. (2014). The female family annihilator: An exploratory study. Homicide Studies, 18, 59-82.
59.
StoneM. H. (2015). Mass murder, mental illness, and men. Violence and Gender, 2, 51-86.
VossekuilB.FeinR. A.ReddyM.BorumR.ModzeleskiW. (2002). The final report and findings of the safe school initiative: Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Department of Education.
63.
WilczynskiA. (1991). Images of women who kill their infants: The mad and the bad. Women & Criminal Justice, 2, 71-88.
64.
WorrallA. (1990). Offending women: Female lawbreakers and the criminal justice system. London, England: Routledge.
