This article is based on an ethnographic study involving 58 Roma and Romanian participants who were released from Jilava Prion in Romania between January and July 2015. The methodology involved interviews, observation, questionnaires, and photovoice. The findings seem to suggest that most of the factors associated with desistance and reentry in the literature are relevant to the ex-prisoner’s experiences. The main contribution of this article is the observation that these factors come into play at different times and in different stages of the reentry process. Five reentry stages were identified in this study: prerelease-anticipation, recovery and reunion, activation, consolidation, and relapse. The aim of the article is to describe this reentry process as the participants experienced it. Theoretical and practice implications are discussed.
ArdittiJ. A. (2016). A family stress-proximal process model for understanding the effects of parental incarceration on children and their families. Couple & Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 5, 65-88.
2.
BurnettR.MarunaS. (2004). So “prison works,” does it? The criminal careers of 130 men released from prison under Home Secretary, Michael Howard. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 390-404.
3.
CalverleyA. (2013). Cultures of desistance: Rehabilitation, reintegration and ethnic minorities. London, England: Routledge.
4.
ComfortM. (2009). Doing time together: Love and family in the shadow of the prison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
DurnescuI.LazarC.ShawR. (2002). Incidence and characteristics of Roma men in Romanian prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 237-244.
6.
FarrallS.HunterB.SharpeG.CalverleyA. (2014). Criminal career in transition. The social context of desistance from crime. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
FarringtonD. P. (1986). Age and crime. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189-250). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
GiordanoP.CernkovichS.RudolphJ. (2002). Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990-1064.
9.
GlueckE. (1937). Culture conflict and delinquency. Mental Hygiene, 2, 46-66.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
HainesK. (1990). After-care services for released prisoners: A review of the literature. London, England: Home Office.
13.
HippJ.PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (2010). Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology, 48, 947-979.
14.
HorneyJ.OsgooD. W.MarshallI. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655-673.
15.
HughesT.WilsonD. J. (2004). Reentry trends in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
16.
LaubJ.NaginD.SampsonJ. (1998). trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225-238.
17.
LiemM.KunstM. J. J. (2013). Is there a recognizable post-incarceration syndrome among released “lifers.”International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 333-337.
18.
LipseyM. W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In McGuireJ. (Ed.), What works? Reducing reoffending (pp. 63-78). New York, NY: John Wiley.
19.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
MarunaS. (2010). Why our beliefs matter in offender management. Prison Service Journal, 192, 22-28.
21.
McCordC. (1990). Crime in moral and social contexts. Criminology, 28, 1-26.
22.
MeadJ. (2007). Resettlement. In CantonR.HancockD. (Eds.), Dictionary of probation and offender management (pp. 268-270). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
23.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2012). Motivational interviewing. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
NeumannC. B.PettersenK. S. (2013). Tilbakeføringsgarantien i praksis: Evaluering av prosjektet TAFU – Tilbakeføring gjennom arbeid, fritid og utdanning [The reintegration guarantee in practice: Evaluation of the TAFU project—Reintegration through work, leisure and education]. (AFI-rapport 11/2013). Oslo, Norway: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttets.
25.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
26.
PopescuR. (2010). Profilul familiei româneşti contemporane [ The profile of the contemporary Romanian family]. Calitatea Vieţii, 1(2), 5-28.
27.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.
28.
RosenfeldR.WallmanJ.FornangoR. (2005). The contribution of ex-prisoners to crime rates. In TravisJ.VisherC. A. (Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 80-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
RoweA.TittleC. (1977). Life cycle changes and criminal propensity. Sociology Quarterly, 18, 223-236.
30.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63-84.
31.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
SchinkelM. (2014). Being imprisoned: Punishment, adaptation and desistance. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
ShoverN. (1985). Aging criminals. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
34.
StraussA. L.CorbinM. J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
35.
SykesG.M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
ThiemeT. A. (2013). The “hustle” amongst youth entrepreneurs in Mathare’s informal waste economy. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 7, 389-412.
37.
VisherC.BaerD.NaserR. (2006). Ohio’s prisoners’ reflections on returning home. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, Justice Police Center.
