Research is limited on mechanisms of action in restorative justice interventions. This multimethods study delineates the change processes underlying a successful in-prison group treatment program by (a) examining shifts in offenders’ self-schemas and (b) identifying key program components that influence this movement. Researchers assigned to small groups as “co-facilitators” gathered data using participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and psychological assessments at three time points. Mechanisms of action include group norms and behaviors that contrast with prior experiences and uncover offenders’ self-schemas through intrapsychic processes, which prompt them to test and act upon new possible selves through the group process.
AbramsL. S.AguilarJ. P. (2005). Negative trends, possible selves, and behavior change: A qualitative study of juvenile offenders in residential treatment. Qualitative Social Work, 4, 175-196.
ArmourM. P.SageJ.RubinA.WindsorL. C. (2005). Bridges to Life: Evaluation of an in-prison restorative justice intervention. Medicine and Law, 24, 831-851.
4.
ArmourM. P.WindsorL. C.AguilarJ.TaubC. (2008). A pilot study of a faith-based restorative justice intervention for Christians and Non-Christian offenders. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 27, 159-167.
5.
BarberJ. P.ConnollyM. B.Crits-ChristophP.GladisL.SiquelandL. (2000). Alliance predicts patients’ outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1027-1032.
6.
BelknapJ. (2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
BudmanS.DembyA.FeldsteinM.RedondoJ.ScherzB.BennettM. J.. . . EllisJ. (1987). Preliminary findings on a new instrument to measure cohesion in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 75-94.
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners, 1994 (Special Report NCJ 193427). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
BurnettR.McNeillF. (2005). The place of the officer–offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal, 52, 247-268.
13.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2000). Perspectives on personality. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
CorteC.SteinK. F. (2005). Body-weight self-schema: Determinant of mood and behavior in women with an eating disorder. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1698-1718.
15.
CrabtreeB.MillerW. (1992). Primary care research: A multi-method typology and qualitative road map. In CrabtreeB.MillerW. (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3-28) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
DraycottS.DabbsA. (1998). Cognitive dissonance 1: An overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice in clinical psychology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 341-353.
18.
FarrallS. (2002). Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context and desistance from crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
19.
FoxK. J. (2015). Theorizing community integration as desistance-promotion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 82-94. doi:10.1177/0093854814550028
20.
GaesG. G.KalleR. J.TedeschiJ. T. (1978). Impression management in the forced compliance situation: Two studies using the bogus pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 493-510.
21.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Social power reduces the strength of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466.
22.
JorgensenD. L. (2003). The methodology of participant observation. In PogrebinM. R. (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to criminal justice (pp. 17-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
JungC. G. (1972). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
KazdinA. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1-27.
25.
KwonS.OeiT. P. S. (2003). Cognitive change processes in a group cognitive behavior therapy of depression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 73-85.
26.
LatimerJ.DowdenC.MuiseD. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85, 127-144.
27.
LynchT. R.ChapmanA. L.RosenthalM. Z.LinehanM. M. (2006). Mechanisms of change in dialectical behavior therapy: Theoretical and empirical observations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 459-480.
28.
MansfieldV. (1995). Synchronicity, science and soul-making: Understanding Jungian synchronicity through physics, Buddhism and philosophy. Peru, IL: Carus Publishing.
29.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
MarunaS.FarrallS. (2004). Desistance from crime: A theoretical reformulation. Kvlner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43, 171-194.
31.
McNeillF. (2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6, 39-62.
32.
MearsD. P.RomanC. G.WolffA.BuckJ. (2006). Faith-based efforts to improve prisoner reentry: Assessing the logic and evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 351-367.
33.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behaviors. New York, NY: Guilford.
34.
MorganR. D.WinterowdC. L. (2002). Interpersonal process-oriented group psychotherapy with offender populations. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 466-482.
35.
MorseJ. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In TashakkoriA.TeddueS. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, Article 5.
37.
PeatD. (1987). Synchronicity: The bridge between matter and mind. New York, NY: Bantam.
38.
PerlsF. S. (1969). Gestalt therapy verbatim. Lafayette, CA: Real People Press.
39.
Pew Center on the States. (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
40.
ProchaskaJ. O.VelicerW. F.DiClementeC. C.FavaJ. (1988). Measuring processes of change: Applications to the cessation of smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 520-528.
41.
RexS. (1999). Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 366-383.
42.
RoxburghE. C.RidgwayS.RoeC. A. (2015). Exploring the meaning in meaningful coincidences: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of synchronicity in therapy. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 17, 144-161.
43.
SteinK. F. (1996). The self-schema model: A theoretical approach to the self-concept in eating disorders. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 10, 96-109.
44.
SteinK. F.MarkusH. (1996). The role of the self in behavioral change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 6, 349-384.
45.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, England: Sage.
46.
TedeschiJ. T. (1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York, NY: Academic Press.
47.
UmbreitM. S.ArmourM. (2010). Restorative justice dialogue: An essential guide for research and practice. New York, NY: Springer.
48.
UmbreitM. S.VosB.CoatesR. B.BrownK. A. (2003). Facing violence: The path of restorative justice and dialogue. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
49.
UmbreitM. S.VosB.CoatesR. B.LightfootE. (2005). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251-304.
50.
WicklundR. A.BrehmJ. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, MJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
YalomI. D.LeszczM. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
52.
ZehrH. J. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
