How Does It Work? Mechanisms of Action in an In-Prison Restorative Justice Program

Abstract

Research is limited on mechanisms of action in restorative justice interventions. This multimethods study delineates the change processes underlying a successful in-prison group treatment program by (a) examining shifts in offenders’ self-schemas and (b) identifying key program components that influence this movement. Researchers assigned to small groups as “co-facilitators” gathered data using participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and psychological assessments at three time points. Mechanisms of action include group norms and behaviors that contrast with prior experiences and uncover offenders’ self-schemas through intrapsychic processes, which prompt them to test and act upon new possible selves through the group process.

Keywords

restorative justice mechanisms offenders group therapy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

L. S.

Aguilar

J. P.

(2005). Negative trends, possible selves, and behavior change: A qualitative study of juvenile offenders in residential treatment. Qualitative Social Work, 4, 175-196.

Armour

M. P.

Rubin

(2006, June). Bridges to Life: A promising in-prison restorative justice intervention. Restorative Justice. Retrieved from http://www.restorativejustice.org/editions/2006/june06/btl

Armour

M. P.

Sage

Rubin

Windsor

L. C.

(2005). Bridges to Life: Evaluation of an in-prison restorative justice intervention. Medicine and Law, 24, 831-851.

Armour

M. P.

Windsor

L. C.

Aguilar

Taub

(2008). A pilot study of a faith-based restorative justice intervention for Christians and Non-Christian offenders. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 27, 159-167.

Barber

J. P.

Connolly

M. B.

Crits-Christoph

Gladis

Siqueland

(2000). Alliance predicts patients’ outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1027-1032.

Belknap

(2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

Bridges to Life. (2015a). The program. Available from http://bridgestolife.org/

Bridges to Life. (2015b). Goals, outcomes, and evaluation. Available from http://bridgestolife.org/

Budman

Demby

Feldstein

Redondo

Scherz

Bennett

M. J.

. . . Ellis

(1987). Preliminary findings on a new instrument to measure cohesion in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 75-94.

10.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners, 1994 (Special Report NCJ 193427). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.

11.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2014, September 30). Prisoners in 2013. Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p13.pdf

12.

Burnett

McNeill

(2005). The place of the officer–offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal, 52, 247-268.

13.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(2000). Perspectives on personality. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

14.

Corte

Stein

K. F.

(2005). Body-weight self-schema: Determinant of mood and behavior in women with an eating disorder. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1698-1718.

15.

Crabtree

Miller

(1992). Primary care research: A multi-method typology and qualitative road map. In Crabtree

Miller

(Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3-28) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. L.

(2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Draycott

Dabbs

(1998). Cognitive dissonance 1: An overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice in clinical psychology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 341-353.

18.

Farrall

(2002). Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context and desistance from crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.

19.

Fox

K. J.

(2015). Theorizing community integration as desistance-promotion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 82-94. doi:10.1177/0093854814550028

20.

Gaes

G. G.

Kalle

R. J.

Tedeschi

J. T.

(1978). Impression management in the forced compliance situation: Two studies using the bogus pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 493-510.

21.

Galinsky

A. D.

Magee

J. C.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Whitson

J. A.

Liljenquist

K. A.

(2008). Social power reduces the strength of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466.

22.

Jorgensen

D. L.

(2003). The methodology of participant observation. In Pogrebin

M. R.

(Ed.), Qualitative approaches to criminal justice (pp. 17-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

23.

Jung

C. G.

(1972). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

24.

Kazdin

A. E.

(2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1-27.

25.

Kwon

Oei

T. P. S.

(2003). Cognitive change processes in a group cognitive behavior therapy of depression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 73-85.

26.

Latimer

Dowden

Muise

(2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85, 127-144.

27.

Lynch

T. R.

Chapman

A. L.

Rosenthal

M. Z.

Linehan

M. M.

(2006). Mechanisms of change in dialectical behavior therapy: Theoretical and empirical observations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 459-480.

28.

Mansfield

(1995). Synchronicity, science and soul-making: Understanding Jungian synchronicity through physics, Buddhism and philosophy. Peru, IL: Carus Publishing.

29.

Maruna

(2001). Making good. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

30.

Maruna

Farrall

(2004). Desistance from crime: A theoretical reformulation. Kvlner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43, 171-194.

31.

McNeill

(2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6, 39-62.

32.

Mears

D. P.

Roman

C. G.

Wolff

Buck

(2006). Faith-based efforts to improve prisoner reentry: Assessing the logic and evidence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 351-367.

33.

Miller

W. R.

Rollnick

(1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behaviors. New York, NY: Guilford.

34.

Morgan

R. D.

Winterowd

C. L.

(2002). Interpersonal process-oriented group psychotherapy with offender populations. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 466-482.

35.

Morse

(2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In Tashakkori

Teddue

(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

36.

Paternoster

Bushway

(2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, Article 5.

37.

Peat

(1987). Synchronicity: The bridge between matter and mind. New York, NY: Bantam.

38.

Perls

F. S.

(1969). Gestalt therapy verbatim. Lafayette, CA: Real People Press.

39.

Pew Center on the States. (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.

40.

Prochaska

J. O.

Velicer

W. F.

DiClemente

C. C.

Fava

(1988). Measuring processes of change: Applications to the cessation of smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 520-528.

41.

Rex

(1999). Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 366-383.

42.

Roxburgh

E. C.

Ridgway

Roe

C. A.

(2015). Exploring the meaning in meaningful coincidences: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of synchronicity in therapy. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 17, 144-161.

43.

Stein

K. F.

(1996). The self-schema model: A theoretical approach to the self-concept in eating disorders. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 10, 96-109.

44.

Stein

K. F.

Markus

(1996). The role of the self in behavioral change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 6, 349-384.

45.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, England: Sage.

46.

Tedeschi

J. T.

(1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York, NY: Academic Press.

47.

Umbreit

M. S.

Armour

(2010). Restorative justice dialogue: An essential guide for research and practice. New York, NY: Springer.

48.

Umbreit

M. S.

Vos

Coates

R. B.

Brown

K. A.

(2003). Facing violence: The path of restorative justice and dialogue. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

49.

Umbreit

M. S.

Vos

Coates

R. B.

Lightfoot

(2005). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251-304.

50.

Wicklund

R. A.

Brehm

J. W.

(1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, MJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

51.

Yalom

I. D.

Leszcz

(2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

52.

Zehr

H. J.

(2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.