This article presents research on women’s perceptions and experiences residing in a female community correction facility. Qualitative interview data and field observations are used to examine resident relationships, perceptions of on-site group treatment, and benefits of receiving off-site treatment. Findings from this study indicate an overwhelming feeling of tension and lack of trust among residents, resulting in most women withdrawing from social interactions. Relationship dynamics also played a role in women’s participation during on-site group treatment and desiring off-site treatment. This study supports the need to create, and sustain, therapeutic environments within community correction settings for women.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
2.
BloomB.CovingtonS. (1998, November11-14). Gender-specific programming for female offenders: What it is and why it is important?Paper presented at the 50th annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC.
3.
BloomB.CovingtonS. (2009). Addressing the mental health needs of women offenders. In GidoR.DalleyL. (Eds.), Women’s mental health issues across the criminal justice system (pp. 160-176). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Pearson.
4.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
5.
BroomeK. M.KnightD. K.KnightK.HillerM. L.SimpsonD. D. (1997). Peer, family, and motivational influences on drug treatment process and recidivism for probationers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 387-397.
6.
CantoraA.MellowJ.SchlagerM. (2014). What about nonprogrammatic factors? Women’s perceptions of staff and resident relationships in a community corrections setting. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53, 1-22.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CovingtonS. (1998). The relational theory of women’s psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In ZaplinR. (Ed.), Female crime & delinquency: Critical perspectives & effective interventions (pp. 113-131). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
9.
CovingtonS. S. (2003). A women’s journey home: Challenges for female offenders. In TravisJ.WaulM. (Eds.), Prisoners once removed (pp.67-103). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
10.
DeLeonG. (1995). Residential therapeutic communities in the mainstream: Diversity and issues. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27, 3-15.
11.
DeLeonG.MelnickG.KresselD. (1997). Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among cocaine and other drug abusers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 169-189.
12.
EinatT.ChenG. (2012). Gossip in a maximum security female prison: An exploratory study. Women & Criminal Justice, 22, 108-134.
13.
GehringK. S.Van VoorhisP.BellV. (2010). “What Works” for female probationers. An evaluation of the moving on program. Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 11(1), 6-10.
14.
GiallombardoR. (1966). Society of women: A study of a women’s prison. New York, NY: Wiley.
15.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
GreerK. (2000). The changing nature of interpersonal relationships in women’s prisons. The Prison Journal, 80, 442-468.
17.
HillerM. L.KnightK.LeukefeldC.SimpsonD. D. (2002). Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice Behavior, 29, 56-75.
18.
JoeG. W.SimpsonD. D.BroomeK. M. (1998). Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction, 93, 1177-1190.
19.
JonesR. S. (1993). Coping with separation: Adaptive responses of women prisoners. Women & Criminal Justice, 5(1), 71-97.
20.
KoonsB. A.BurrowJ. D.MorashM.BynumT. (1997). Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 512-532.
21.
KruttschnittC.GartnerR.MillerA. (2000). Doing her own time? Women’s responses to prison in the context of the old and the new penology. Criminology, 38, 681-718.
22.
LichtenwalterS.GaraseM. L.BarkerD. B. (2010). Evaluation of the house of healing: An alternative to female incarceration. Journal of Sociology & Social Work, XXXVII(1), 75-94.
23.
MacNairR. R.CorazziniJ. G. (1994). Client factors influencing group therapy dropout. Psychotherapy, 31, 352-362.
24.
McRobertsC.BurlingameG. M.HoagM. J. (1998). Comparative efficacy of individual and group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 101-117.
25.
MelnickG.DeLeonG. (1999). Clarifying the nature of therapeutic community treatment: The Survey of Essential Elements Questionnaire (SEEQ). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16, 307-313.
26.
MessinaN.GrellaC.CartierJ.TorresS. (2010). A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 97-107.
27.
MillerJ. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
28.
MosherC.PhilipsD. (2006). The dynamics of a prison-based therapeutic community for women offenders: Retention, completion, and outcomes. The Prison Journal, 86(6), 6-31.
29.
OwenB. (1998). “In the mix”: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
PropperA. M. (1982). Make-believe families and homosexuality among imprisoned girls. Criminology, 20, 127-138.
31.
SeveranceT. A. (2005). “You know who you can go to”: Cooperation and exchange between incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 85, 343-367.
32.
SimpsonD. D. (1997). Patient engagement and duration of treatment (Unpublished Paper funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse, Grant No. R01DA06162). Fort Worth: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University.
33.
SimpsonD. D. (2001). Modeling treatment process and outcomes. Addiction, 96, 207-211.
34.
SimpsonD. D.JoeG. W. (1993). Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy, 30, 357-368.
35.
SimpsonD. D.JoeG. W.Rowan-SzalG.GreenerJ. (1995). Client engagement and change during drug abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 7, 117-134.
36.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
TripodiS. J.BledsoeS. E.KlimJ. S.BenderK. (2011). Effects of correctional-based programs for female inmates: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 15-31.
38.
WardD. A.KassebaumG. G. (1965). Women’s prison: Sex and social structure. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
39.
WelshW. N.McGrainP. N. (2008). Predictors of therapeutic engagement in prison-based drug treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 96, 271-280.
40.
WrightE. M.DeHartD. D.Koons-WittB. A.CrittendenC. A. (2013). “Buffers” against crime? Exploring the roles and limitations of positive relationships among women in prison. Punishment & Society, 15, 71-95.
41.
WrightE. M.Van VoorhisP.SalisburyE.BaumanA. (2009). Gender-responsive prisons: Lessons from the NIC/UC gender-responsive classification project. Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 10, 81-96.
