Using a sample of 256 juvenile offenders who were randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, this study evaluates a cognitive-behavioral program that combines cognitive training, goal setting, and a phone-coach follow-up. The training involved six classroom sessions where participants received instruction and help in creating individualized goals. After attending the classes, participants received automated phone calls twice a day for up to a year. During the year following the program, the treatment and control groups were not significantly different in whether or not they were rearrested or in total rearrests. However, the total number of calls received had a significant negative association with whether or not they were rearrested for a felony and with the total number of felony rearrests.
AgnewR. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
3.
AshfordS. J.De StobbeleirK. E. M. (2013). Feedback, goal setting, and task performance revisited. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 51-64). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BakerS. M.MarshakH. H.RiceG. T.ZimmermanG. J. (2001). Patient participation in physical therapy goal setting. Physical Therapy, 81, 1118-1126.
5.
BennettR. F. (1987). Gaining control. Salt Lake City, UT: Franklin International Institute.
6.
BoyumD. A.CaulkinsJ. P.KleimanM. A. R. (2011). Drugs, crime, and public policy. In WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Crime and public policy (pp. 368-410). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
BurrastonB. O.BahrS. J.CherringtonD. J. (2014). Reducing juvenile delinquency with automated cell phone calls. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 522-536.
8.
BurrastonB. O.CherringtonD. J.BahrS. J. (2012). Reducing juvenile recidivism with cognitive training and a cell phone follow-up: An evaluation of the RealVictory Program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 61-80.
9.
BushwayS. D.ApelR. (2012). A signaling perspective on employment-based reentry programming. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 21-50.
10.
CacciolaJ. S.CamilleriA. C.CariseD.RikoonS. H.McKayJ. R.McLellanA. T.. . . SchwarzloseJ. T. (2008). Extending residential care through telephone counseling: Initial results from the Betty Ford Center Focused Continuing Care protocol. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 1208-1216.
11.
CastroC. M.LingA. C. (2002). Telephone-assisted counseling for physical activity. Exercise and Sport Science Review, 30, 64-68.
12.
CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In HawkinsJ. D. (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149-197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CherringtonD. J.BahrS. J.KawaiL. A.BennettB. W.BurrastonB. O. (2011). Helping offenders: What works?Springville, UT: RealVictory.
14.
CherringtonD. J.CherringtonJ. O. (1973). Appropriate reinforcement contingencies in the budgeting process. Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies, 11, 225-253.
15.
CoppackR. J.KristensenJ.KarageorghisC. I. (2012). Use of a goal setting intervention to increase adherence to low back pain rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26, 1032-1042.
16.
CullenF. T.JonsonC. L. (2011). Rehabilitation and treatment programs. In WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Crime and public policy (pp. 293-344). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
DattoC. J.ThompsonR.HorowitzD.DisbotM.OslinD. W. (2003). The pilot study of a telephone disease management program for depression. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25, 169-177.
18.
DavisC.BahrS. J.WardC. (2013). The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners reenter society. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13, 446-469.
19.
GendreauP. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In HarlandA. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
GilbertH.SuttonS. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation in a randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 101, 590-598.
21.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolfJ. A. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 880-1064.
HeslinP. A.WangK. L. (2013). Determinants of goals. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 133-146). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
HilbeJ. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HockenberryS.PuzzancheraC. (2014). Juvenile court statistics 2011. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
26.
InciardiJ. A.MartinS. S.ButzinC. A. (2004). Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 88-107.
27.
JewellJ. D.MaloneM. D.RoseP.SturgeonD.OwensS. (2015). A multiyear follow-up study examining the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral group therapy program on the recidivism of juveniles on probation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 259-272.
28.
KleinH. J.CooperJ. T.MonahanC. A. (2013). Goal commitment. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 65-89). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
KurlychekM.KempinenC. (2006). Beyond boot camp: The impact of aftercare on offender reentry. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 363-388.
30.
LandenbergerN. A.LipseyM. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451-476.
31.
LathamG. P.MitchellT. R.DossettD. L. (1978). Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 163-171.
32.
LathamG. P.YuklG. A. (1975). Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 299-302.
33.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
LeBelT. P.BurnettR.MarunaS.BushwayS. (2008). The “chicken and egg” of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 131-159.
35.
LevackW. M. M.DeanS. G.SiegertR. J.McPhersonK. M. (2011). Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: How clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 206-213.
36.
LipseyM. W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In McGuireJ. (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending—Guidelines from research and practice (pp. 63-78). New York, NY: John Wiley.
37.
LipseyM. W. (2014). Interventions for juvenile offenders: A serendipitous journey. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 1-14.
38.
LipseyM. W.ChapmanG. L.LandenbergerN. A. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 144-157.
39.
LipseyM. W.CullenF. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297-320.
40.
LockeE. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189.
41.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2013). New developments in goal setting and task performance. New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
MacKenzieD. L. (2006). What works in corrections?New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
43.
MarunaS.LeBelT. P. (2010). The desistance paradigm in correctional practice: From programmes to lives. In McNeillF.RaynorP.TrotterC. (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 65-87). Oxon, UK: Willan.
44.
MundtJ. C.MooreH. K.BeanP. (2006). An interactive voice response program to reduce drinking relapse: A feasibility study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 21-29.
45.
OudejansS. C. C.SchippersG. M.MerkxM. J. M.SchramadeM. H.KoeterM. W. J.van den BrinkW. (2009). Feasibility and validity of low-budget telephonic follow-up interviews in routine outcome monitoring of substance abuse treatment. Addiction, 104, 1138-1146.
46.
PuzzancheraC. (2013). Juvenile arrests, 2011 (National Report Series: Bulletin NCJ 244476). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
47.
RhineE. E.MawhorrT. L.ParksE. C. (2006). Implementation: The bane of effective correctional programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 347-358.
48.
SeiterR. P.KadelaK. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 360-388.
WeitzelJ. A.BernhardtJ. M.UsdanS.MaysD.GlanzK. (2007). Using wireless handheld computers and tailored text messaging to reduce negative consequences of drinking alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 534-537.
51.
WilsonJ. A.DavisR. C. (2006). Good intentions meet hard realities: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight reentry program. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 303-338.
52.
WormwithJ. S.AlthouseR.SimpsonM.ReitzelL. R.FaganT. J.MorganR. D. (2007). The rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders: The current landscape and some future directions for correctional psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 879-892.
