AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
3.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2007). Risk-Need-Responsivity model for offender assessment and treatment (User Report No. 2007-06). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
4.
CritesE. L.TaxmanF. S. (2013). The responsivity principle: Determining the appropriate program and dosage to match risk and needs. In TaxmanF. S.PattavinaA. (Eds.), Simulation strategies to reduce recidivism (pp. 143-166). New York, NY: Springer.
5.
FarkasM. A. (2014). The potential of research to inform theory, policy, and practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 391-393.
6.
PolashekD. (2012). An appraisal of the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 1-17.
7.
TaxmanF. S.ThannerM. (2006). Risk, Need, and Responsivity (RNR): It all depends. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 28-51.