The process underlying desistance is still a strong subject of debate. This article seeks to introduce several core concepts of Archer’s morphogenic approach to study how people desist from crime. At first, it discusses the primary existing theories of desistance. Then, this article demonstrates the usefulness of this approach by presenting empirical evidence drawn from semistructured interviews collected with 29 men who desisted from crime in an eastern province of Canada. The study demonstrates how this alternative approach allows for the consolidation of existing knowledge on desistance. Then implication of these findings for both theory and practice are discussed.
ArcherM. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
ArcherM. S. (1996). Culture and agency: The place of culture in the social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArcherM. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArcherM. S. (2002). Realism and the problem of agency. Alethia, 5(1), 11-20.
5.
ArcherM. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ArcherM. S. (2010). Routine, reflexivity and realism. Sociological Theory, 28, 272-303.
7.
BarryM. (2006). Youth offending in transition: The search of social recognition. Abington, UK: Routledge.
8.
BazemoreG.ErbeC. (2004). Reintegration and restorative justice: Towards a theory and practice of informal social control and support. In MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 27-56). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
9.
BouffardL. A.LaubJ. H. (2004). Jail or the army: Does military service facilitate desistance from crime? In MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (Eds.), After crime and punishment. Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 129-151). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
10.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of social capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 46-58). New York, NY: Greenwood.
11.
BrackenD. C.DeaneL.MorrissetteL. (2009). Desistance and social marginalization: The case of Canadian aboriginal offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 61-78.
12.
BurnettR.MarunaS. (2004). So “prison works,” does it? The criminal careers of 130 men release from prison under Home Secretary Michael Howard. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 390-404.
13.
BushwayS. D.PiqueroA.MazerolleP.BroidyL.CauffmanE. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology, 39, 491-515.
14.
CharmazK. (2003). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 311-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, s95-s120.
16.
CussonM.PinsonneaultP. (1986). The decision to give up crime. In CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 72-82). New York, NY: Springler-Verlag.
17.
DurkheimÉ. (1963). Les règles de la méthode scientifique [The rules of the sociological method] (15th ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
18.
FarrallS. (2002). Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context and desistance from crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
19.
FarrallS. (2004). Social capital and offender reintegration: Making probation desistance focused. In MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 57-82). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
20.
FarrallS. (2005). On the existential aspects of desistance from crime. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 367-386.
21.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolphJ. L. (2002). Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990-1064.
22.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59-82.
24.
HaggardU.GumpertC. H.GrannM. (2001). Against all odds: A qualitative follow-up study of high-risk violent offenders who were not reconvicted. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1048-1065.
25.
HorneyJ.OsgoodD. W.MarshallI. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655-673.
26.
HunterA. J. (1985). Private, parochial and public social orders: The problem of crime and incivility in urban communities. In SuttlesG. D.ZaldM. N. (Eds.), The challenge of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society (230-242). Norwood, NJ: Aldex.
27.
JacobsB. A.WrightR. (1999). Stick-up, street culture and offender motivation. Criminology, 37, 149-173.
28.
KaminskiD. (2006). Un nouveau sujet de droit pénal? [A new subject of penal law?]. In DigneffeF.MoreauT. (Eds.), La responsabilité et la responsabilisation dans la justice pénale (pp. 323-342). Bruxelles, Belgium: Lacier et de boeck.
29.
KazemianL.FarringtonD. P.Le BlancM. (2009). Is it possible to make accurate long-term predictions about patterns of de-escalation?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 384-400.
30.
KivinenO.PiiroinenT. (2006). On the limits of a realist conception of knowledge: A pragmatist critique of Archerian realism. The Sociological Review, 224-241.
31.
KruttschnittC.UggenC.SheltonK. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61-87.
32.
LaubJ. H.NaginD. S.SampsonR. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225-238.
33.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime (Vol. 28). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
MaguireM. (2007). The resettlement of ex-prisoners. In GesthorpeL.MorganR. (Eds.), Handbook of probation (pp. 398-427). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
36.
MarunaS. (1998). Redeeming one’s self: How reformed ex-offenders make sense of their lives (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL). Available from Proquest Dissertations & Theses. (AAT 991 3841)
37.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
MarunaS. (2004). Desistance from crime and explanatory style. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 184-200.
39.
MarunaS.LeBelT.P.MitchellN.NaplesM. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime though the looking glass. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 271-281.
40.
MassogliaM.UggenC. (2007). Subjective desistance and the transition to adulthood. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 90-103.
41.
McCullochT. (2005). Probation, social context and desistance: Retracing the relationship. Probation Journal, 52, 8-22.
42.
McNeillF. (2004). Desistance, rehabilitation and correctionalism: Development and prospects in Scotland. The Howard Journal, 43, 420-446.
43.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
MoffitT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
45.
MorizotJ.Le BlancM. (2007). Behavioral, self and social control predictors of desistance from crime: A test of launch and contemporaneous effects models. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 50-71.
46.
MutchA. (2004). Constraint on the internal conversation: Margaret Archer and the structural shaping of thought. Journal of Theory of Social Behaviour, 34, 429-450.
47.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. D. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, 1103-1156.
48.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
PiqueroA. R. (2004). Somewhere between persistence and desistance: The intermittency of criminal careers. In MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 102-125). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
50.
PiresA. P. (1997). Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: Essai théorique et méthodologique [Sampling in qualitative research: A theoretical and methodological essay]. In PoupartJ.DeslauriersJ.-P.GroulxL.-H.LaperrièreA.MayerR.PiresA. (Eds.), La recherche qualitative: Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques (pp. 113-169). Montréal, Quebec, Canada: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur.
51.
PopperK. (1956). Misère de l’historicisme [The poverty of historicism]. Paris, France: Plon.
52.
PutnamR. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
53.
QuételetA. (2003). Of the propensity to crime. In McLauglinE.MuncieJ.GordonH. (Eds.), Criminological perspectives: Essential readings (2nd ed., pp. 36-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Original work published 1831)
54.
RexS. (1999). Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation. Howard Journal, 38, 366-383.
55.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. London, England: Harvard University Press.
56.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2003). Life course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555-592.
57.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H.WimerC. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44, 465-508.
58.
Savoie-ZajcL. (2009). L’entrevue semi-dirigée [The semi-structured interview]. In GauthierB. (Ed.), Recherche sociale de la problématique à la collecte de données (pp. 337-360). Québec City, Canada: Presse de l’Université du Québec.
59.
SavolainenJ. (2009). Work, family and criminal desistance. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 285-304.
60.
ShoverN. (1983). The later stages of ordinary property offender careers. Social Problems, 31, 208-218.
61.
ShoverN. (1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
62.
SutherlandE. H.CresseyD. R. (1960). Principles of criminology (6th ed.). Chicago, IL: Lippincott.
63.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246.
64.
ThornberryT. P. (1997). Developmental theories of crime and delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
65.
TunnellK. D. (1992). Choosing crime: The criminal calculus of property offenders. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
66.
UggenC.ManzaJ.BehrensA. (2004). Less than average citizen: Stigma, role transition and civic reintegration of convicted felons. In MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 261-293). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
67.
VacheretM. (2006). Gestion de la peine et maintien de l’ordre dans les institutions fédérales canadiennes [Sentence management and order enforcement in Canadian federal penitentiaries]. Contrôle, pouvoir et domination: les « réussites » de la prison. Déviance et société, 30(3), 289-304.
68.
VandenbergheF. (2005). The Archers: A tale of folk (final episode)?European Journal of Social Theory, 8, 227-237.
69.
VandenbergheF. (2007). Une ontologie réaliste pour la sociologie: Système, morphogénèse et collectifs [A realist ontology for sociology: System, morphogenesis and collectivities]. Théorie et Méthodes, 46, 487-542.
70.
VaughanB. (2001). Handle with care: On the use of structuration theory within criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 185-200.
71.
VaughanB. (2007). The internal narrative of desistance. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 390-404.
72.
VeyseyB. M.MartinezD. J.ChristianJ. (2013). Getting out: A summary of qualitative research on desistance across life course. In GibsonC. L.KrohnM. D. (Eds.), Handbook of life-course criminology: Emerging trends and directions for future research (pp. 233-260). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
73.
WadsworthT. (2006). The meaning of work: Conceptualizing the deterrent effect of employment on crime among young adults. Sociological Perspectives, 49(3), 343-368.
74.
WarrM. (1998). Life-course transition and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183-216.
