This study assessed the effectiveness of a cognitive intervention treatment program for juvenile offenders, which is called the Juvenile Cognitive Intervention Program. The program was provided to incarcerated delinquents at three juvenile correctional facilities in Wisconsin. The results indicated that using the How I Think (HIT) Questionnaire as a measure of change, significant improvement in reducing cognitive distortions were found across age groups and gender, and included individuals who were unable to successfully complete the program the first time and then completed it successfully. The HIT is a measure of cognitive distortions that are associated with delinquent thinking patterns and behavior. Cognitive change is a major focus of treatment programs in juvenile corrections as there has been substantive research demonstrating a link to reduced delinquent and later criminal behavior.
BarrigaA. Q.GibbsJ. C. (1996). Measuring cognitive distortion in antisocial youth: Development and preliminary evaluation of the How I Think questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 333-343.
2.
BarrigaA. Q.GibbsJ. C.PotterG. B.LiauA. K. (2001). How I Think (HIT) questionnaire manual. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
3.
BarrigaA. Q.LandauJ. R.StinsonB. L.LiauA. K.GibbsJ. C. (2000). Cognitive distortion and problem behaviors in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 36-56.
4.
BogestadA.KettlerR.HaganM. (2009). Evaluation of a cognitive intervention program for juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 20, 1-14.
5.
CauffmanE. (2008). Understanding the female offender. Future of Children: Juvenile Justice, 18, 119-142.
DelvinR.GibbsJ. (2010). Responsible Adult Culture (ROC) cognitive and behavioral changes at a community-based correctional facility. Journal of Research in Character Education, 8, 1-20.
9.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodJ.RidderE. M. (2005). Show me the child at seven: The consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 837-849.
10.
GibbsJ. C. (1991). Sociomoral developmental delay and cognitive distortion: Implications for the treatment of antisocial youth. In KurtinesW. M.GewirtzJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol. 3. Application (pp. 95-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
GibbsJ. C. (1993). Moral-cognitive interventions. In GoldsteinA. P.HuffC. R. (Eds.), The gang intervention handbook (pp. 159-185). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
12.
GibbsJ. C.PotterG.GoldsteinA. P. (1995). The EQUIP program: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer-helping approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
HipwellA. E.LoeberR. (2006). Do we know which interventions are effective for disruptive and delinquent girls?Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9, 221-255.
15.
LardenM.MelinL.HolstU.LangstromN. (2006). Moral judgement, cognitive distortions and empathy in incarcerated delinquent and community control adolescents. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 453-462.
16.
LeemanL. W.GibbsJ. C.FullerD. (1993). Evaluation of a multi-component group treatment program for juvenile delinquents. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 281-292.
17.
LevittS. D. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: Four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 163-190.
18.
LiauA. K.BarrigaA. Q.GibbsJ. C. (1998). Relations between self-serving cognitive distortions and overt vs. covert antisocial behavior in adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 335-346.
19.
LipseyM. W.ChapmanG.LandenbergerN. A. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 144-157.
20.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B.CothernL. (2000). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders (Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
21.
MerweA.DawesA. (2007). Youth violence: A review of risk factors, causal pathways and effective intervention. Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 19, 95-113.
22.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA.RutterM.SilvaP. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
PajerK. (1998). What happens to bad girls? A review of the adult outcomes of antisocial adolescent girls. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 862-870.
24.
PulkkinenL.PitkanenT. (1993). Continuities in aggressive behavior from childhood to adulthood. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 249-263.
ShearerR. (2003). Identifying the special needs of female offenders. Federal Probation, 67, 46-56.
27.
SnyderH. N.SickmundM. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 National Report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
28.
SpilkeH.PiephoP.HuX. (2005). Analysis of unbalanced data by mixed linear model using the MIXED procedure of the SAS system. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 191, 47-54.
WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P. (2000). Correctional intervention programs and cost-benefit analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 115-133.
31.
WilsonS.AttrillG.NugentF. (2003). Effective interventions for acquisitive offenders: An investigation of cognitive skills programmes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 83-101.
32.
WormithJ. S.AlthouseR.SimpsonM.ReitzelL.FaganT. J.MorganR. D. (2007). The rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders: The current landscape and some future directions for correctional psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 879-892.
33.
YochelsonS.SamenowS. E. (1976). The criminal personality: A profile for change (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
