This study examined the relationship between psychometric test scores, psychometric test profiles, and sexual and/or violent reconviction. A sample of 3,402 convicted sexual offenders who attended a probation service–run sexual offender treatment programme in the community completed a battery of psychometric tests pre- and posttreatment. Using Cox regression, posttreatment scores on measures of self-esteem, an ability to relate to fictional characters, and recognition of risk factors were, individually, predictive of recidivism. When psychometric tests were grouped into dynamic risk domains, only the pretreatment scores of the domain labelled socioaffective functioning (SAF) predicted recidivism and added predictive power to a static risk assessment. The number of risk domains that were dysfunctional pretreatment also predicted recidivism outcome; however, this did not add predictive power to a static risk assessment tool. Possible explanations for the superiority of pre- over posttreatment scores in predicting reconviction are discussed, and directions for further research considered.
AllanM.GraceR. C.RutherfordB.HudsonS. M. (2007). Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 347-367.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
BarnettG. D.WakelingH. C.HowardP. D. (2010). An examination of the predictive validity of the Risk Matrix 2000 in England and Wales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22 (4), 443-470.
4.
BarrattE. S. (1994). Impulsiveness and aggression. In MonahanJ.SteadmanH. J. (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment (pp. 61-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BeckettR. C. (1987). The Children and Sex Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
BeckettR. C.FisherD. (1994). Assessing victim empathy: A new measure. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of ATSA (the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers). San Francisco, CA.
7.
BeckettR. C.FisherD.MannR.ThorntonD. (1997). The Relapse Prevention Questionnaire and Interview. In EldridgeH. (Ed.), Therapists guide for maintaining change: Relapse prevention manual for adult male perpetrators of child sexual abuse (pp. 445-473). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
BeechA. R. (1997). Towards a psychometric typology for assessing pre-treatment level of problems in child abusers. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 3, 87-100.
9.
BeechA. R. (1998). A psychometric typology of child abusers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 319-339.
10.
BeechA. R.FisherD.BeckettR. (1998). STEP 3: An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. London, England: Home Office Research Report.
11.
BeechA. R.FisherD.ThorntonD. (2003). Risk assessment of sex offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 339-352.
12.
BeechA.FordH. (2006). The relationship between risk, deviance, treatment outcome and sexual reconviction in a sample of child sexual abusers completing residential treatment for their offending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 685-701.
13.
BeechA. R.FriendshipC.EriksonM.HansonR. K. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of UK child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 155-167.
14.
BeechA. R.WardT. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sex offenders: A theoretical model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31-63.
15.
BontaJ. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In HarlandA. T. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
CraigL. A.BeechA.BrowneK. D. (2006). Cross-validation of the Risk Matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 612-633.
17.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multi-dimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-100.
18.
ElliotI. A.BeechA. R.Mandeville-NordenR.HayesE. (2009). Psychological profiles of internet sex offenders comparisons with contact sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 76-92.
19.
FisherD.BeechA.BrowneK. (1999). Comparison of sex offenders to non-sex offenders on selected psychological measures. International Journal of Offender therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 473-491.
20.
GroveW. M.ZaldD. H.LebowB. S.SnitzB. E.NelsonC. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-31.
21.
GrubinD. (2008). Validation of Risk Matrix 2000 for use in Scotland (Report prepared for the Risk Management Authority). Available from http://rmascotland.org/ViewFile.aspx?id=329
22.
HansonR. K.BussièreM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
23.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105-122.
24.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.ScottT. L.HelmusL. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-2005). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
25.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (Corrections Research User Report No. 2004-2002). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
26.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
27.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
28.
HansonR. K.MortonK. E.HarrisJ. R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk. What we know and what we need to know. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 989, 154-166.
29.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Notes on the Development of Static–2002 (Corrections Research User Report No. 2003-01). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
30.
HarrellF. E.LeeK. L.MarkD. B. (1996). Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 361-387.
31.
HoldenR. R.KronerD. G.FekkenG. C.PophamS. M. (1992). A model of personality test item response dissimulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 272-279.
32.
KeltnerA. A.MarshallP. G.MarshallW. L. (1981). Measurement and correlation of assertiveness and social fear in a prison population. Corrective and Social Psychiatry, 27, 41-47.
33.
Mandeville-NordenR.BeechA.MiddletonD. (2006). The development of the sex offender psychometric scoring system (SOPSSys) in the probation service. Journal of Community and Criminal Justice, 53, 71-76.
34.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217. doi:10.1177/107906321036603910.1177/1079063210366039
35.
MathieN.WakelingH. C. (2011). Assessing socially desirable responding and its impact on self-report measures among sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 215-237. doi:10.1080/1068316090311368110.1080/10683160903113681
36.
NowickiS. (1976). Adult Nowicki-Strickland Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (Test Manual available from S. Nowicki Jr. Department of Psychology). Atlanta, GA: Emory University.
37.
PattonJ. H.StanfordM. S.BarrattE. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768-774.
38.
PaulhusD. L. (1988). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7. New York, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
39.
RallingsM.WebsterS. D. (2001). The psychometric properties of the HMPS SOTP psychometric battery. Unpublished manuscript.
40.
Rehabilitation Services Group. (2009). Community sex offender group-work programmes: Annual Review 08-09. Unpublished Report.
41.
RussellD.PeplanL. A.CutronaC. A. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
42.
ThorntonD. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 137-151.
43.
ThorntonD. (2007). Scoring Guide for the Risk Matrix 2000.9/SVC: February 2007 Version. Unpublished manuscript.
44.
ThorntonD.BeechA.MarshallW. L. (2004). Pre-treatment self-esteem and post-treatment sexual recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 587-599.
45.
ThorntonD.MannR.WebsterS.BludL.TraversR.FriendshipC.EriksonM. (2003). Distinguishing between and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. In PrentkyR.A.JanusE.S.SetonM.C. (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 989, 223-235.
46.
WakelingH.BeechA.FreemantleN. (2010). The relationship between self-report psychometrics and recidivism amongst sexual offenders: An examination of individual psychometrics and psychometrics grouped into risk domains. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47.
WardT. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513-528.
48.
WebsterS. D.MannR. E.CarterA. J.LongJ.MilnerR. J.O’BrienM. D.. . . RayN. (2006). Inter-rater reliability of dynamic risk assessment with sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 439-452.
49.
WebsterS. D.MannR. E.ThorntonD.WakelingH. C. (2007). Further validation of the Short Self-Esteem Scale with sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 207-216.
