The link between drug and alcohol abuse and criminal behavior is clearly illustrated in the literature. The options of how to respond to these offenders, however, has widely fluctuated over time. Currently, many states have reconsidered their “get tough” approach to one that is more rehabilitative in nature. One particular community-based intervention that has gained in popularity is the drug court model. The literature on drug courts is generally supportive; however, there is a need to examine effectiveness by target population. The purpose of this study is to explore recidivism rates of drug court clients by drug of choice. Using a 2-year follow-up period, this study finds that drug of choice does not significantly influence either successful graduation or arrest. Policy implications are discussed.
Aharonovich, E., Hasin, D.S., Brooks, A.C., Liu, X., Bisaga, A., & Nunes, E.V. ( 2006). Cognitive deficits predict low treatment retention in cocaine dependent patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence , 81, 313-322.
2.
American University Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project. (1998). Looking at a decade of drug courts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
3.
Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. ( 1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
4.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
5.
Andrews, D.A., Kiessling, J.J., Robinson, D., & Mickus, S.G. ( 1986). The risk principle of case classification: An outcome evaluation with young adult probationers. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 28, 377-384.
6.
Bagley, S.C., White, H., & Golomb, B.A. ( 2001). Logistic regression in the medical literature: Standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 979-985.
7.
Belenko, S. ( 2002). The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1635-1664.
8.
Belenko, S., Fagan, J., & Chin, K. ( 1991). Criminal justice responses to crack. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 55-74.
9.
Belenko, S., Fagan, J.A., & Dumanovsky, T. (1994). The effects of legal sanctions on recidivism in special drug courts. The Justice System Journal , 17, 53-79.
10.
Belenko, S., Mara-Drita, I., & McElroy, J. ( 1992). Pre-arraignment drug tests in the pretrial release decision: Predicting defendant failure to appear. Crime & Delinquency , 38, 554-582.
11.
Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 107-118.
12.
Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 1990). Classification to halfway houses: A quasi-experimental evaluation. Criminology, 28, 497-506.
13.
Bonta, J.L. ( 1989). Native inmates: Institutional response, risk, and needs . Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 49-62.
14.
Bouffard, J.A., & Richardson, K.A. (2007). The effectiveness of drug court programming for specific kinds of offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 274-293.
15.
Brewster, M.P. ( 2001). An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) drug court program . Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 177-206.
16.
Butzin, C.A., Saum, C.A., & Scarpitti, F.R. (2002). Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1615-1633.
17.
California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. ( 2006). Fact sheet: Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. Sacramento, CA: Office of Criminal Justice Collaboration. Retrieved from http://cadpaac.org/downloads/SACPA%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf
Cosden, M.A., Basch, J., Campos, E., Greenwell, A., Barazani, S., & Walker, S. ( 2006). Effects of motivation and problem severity on court-based drug treatment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 599-618.
20.
Cunha, P.J., Nicastri, S., Gomes, L.P., Moino, R.M., & Peluso, M.A. ( 2004). Neuropsychological impairments in crack cocaine-dependent inpatients: Preliminary findings. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria , 26, 103-106.
21.
Dannerbeck, A., Harris, G., Sundet, P., & Lloyd, K. ( 2006). Understanding and responding to racial differences in drug court outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse , 5, 1-22.
22.
Deschenes, E.P., & Greenwood, P.W. (1994). Maricopa County’s drug court: An innovative program for first-time drug offenders on probation . The Justice System Journal, 17, 99-73.
23.
Dynia, P., & Sung, H. ( 2000). The safety and effectiveness of diverting felony drug offenders to residential treatment as measured by recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 299-311.
24.
Fagan, J.A. ( 1994). Do criminal sanctions deter drug crimes? In D. L. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 89-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. ( 1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult recidivism: What works? Criminology, 34, 575-607.
26.
Goldkamp, J.S. ( 1999). Challenges for research and innovation: When is a drug court not a drug court? In W. C. Terry (Ed.), The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation (pp. 166-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
Goldkamp, J.S., White, M.D., & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues , 31, 27-72.
28.
Gottfredson, D.C., Najaka, S.S., & Kearley, B. ( 2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 171-196.
29.
Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. ( 1998). An examination of the Denver drug court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law & Policy , 20, 183-202.
30.
Greene, J.A. ( 2003). Smart on crime: Positive trends in state-level sentencing and corrections policy. Washington, DC: Families Against Mandatory Minimums.
31.
Herz, D.C. ( 2000). Drugs in the heartland: Methamphetamine use in rural Nebraska. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
32.
Hiller, M.L., Knight, K., & Simpson, D.D. ( 1999). Risk factors that predict dropout from corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79, 411-430.
33.
Holsinger, A.M., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2004). Validating the LSI-R on a sample of jail inmates . Journal of Offender Monitoring, Winter/Spring, 8-9.
34.
Holtfreter, K., & Cupp, R. ( 2007). Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice , 23, 363-382.
35.
Hopwood, C.J., Baker, K.L., & Morey, L.C. ( 2008). Personality and drugs of choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1413-1421.
36.
Karberg, J.C., & James, D.J. ( 2005). Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates, 2002 (NCJ 209588). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
37.
Kelly, C.E., & Welsh, W.N. ( 2008). The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised for drug-involved offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35, 819-831.
38.
Langan, P.A., & Levin, D.J. ( 2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 (NCJ 193427) . Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
39.
Listwan, S.J., Jonson, C.L., Cullen, F.T., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2008). Cracks in the penal harm movement: Evidence from the field. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 423-465.
40.
Listwan, S.J., Shaffer, D.K., & Hartman, J.L. ( 2009). Combating methamphetamine use in the community: The efficacy of the drug court model. Crime & Delinquency , 54, 627-644.
41.
Listwan, S.J., Shaffer, D.K., & Latessa, ( 2001). The Akron Municipal Drug Court: Outcome evaluation findings . Cincinnati, OH: Center for Criminal Justice Research.
42.
Listwan, S.J., Sundt, J., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389-411.
43.
Longshore, D., Hawken, A., Urada, D., & Anglin, D. ( 2006). Cost study: Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (first and second years). Los Angeles, CA : UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs .
44.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A., Harrell, A., McBride, D., et al. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 7-26.
45.
Lowenkamp, C.T., & Bechtel, K. ( 2007). The predictive validity of the LSI-R on a sample of offenders drawn from the records of the Iowa Department of Corrections Data Management System. Federal Probation, 71(3), 25-29.
46.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of child abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28, 543-563.
47.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2005). Are drug courts effective? A meta-analytic review . Journal of Community Corrections, 28, 5-10.
48.
Marlowe, D.B., Festinger, D.S., Lee, P.A., Dugosh, K.L., & Benasutti, K.M. (2006). Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency , 55, 52-76.
49.
Miethe, T.D., Lu, H., & Reese, E. ( 2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime & Delinquency , 46, 522-541.
50.
Miller, J.M., & Shutt, J.E. ( 2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 91-106.
51.
Mumola, C.J. ( 1999). Substance abuse and treatment, state, and federal prisoners, 1997 (NCJ 172871). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
52.
Mumola, C.J., & Karberg, J.C. ( 2006). Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004 (NCJ 213530). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
53.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals. ( 1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice , Bureau of Justice Assistance.
54.
Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project. (2009). Summary of drug court activity by state and county. Retrieved from http://www.1.spa.american.edu/justice/documents/2150.pdf
55.
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T.R., & Feinstein, A.R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 1373-1379.
56.
Peters, R.H., & Murrin, M.R. ( 2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 27, 72-96.
57.
Rempel, M., Fox-Kralstein, D., Cissner, A., Cohen, R., Labriola, M., Farole, D., et al. (2003). The New York State Adult Drug Court evaluation: Policies, participants and impacts [Technical report]. New York, NY: The Center for Court Innovation.
58.
Roll, J.M., Prendergast, M., Richardson, K., Burdon, W., & Ramirez, A. ( 2005). Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse , 31, 641-656.
59.
Roman, J., Townsend, W., & Bhati, A.S. ( 2002). Recidivism rates for drug court graduates: Nationally based estimates, final report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
60.
Saum, C.A., Scarpitti, F.R., & Robbins, C.A. ( 2001). Violent offenders in drug court. Journal of Drug Issues, 3, 107-128.
61.
Schiff, M., & Terry, W.C. ( 1997). Predicting graduation from Broward County’s dedicated drug treatment court. Justice System Journal, 19, 291-310.
62.
Semple, S.J., Zians, J., & Strathdee, S.A. (2008). Methamphetamine-using felons: Psychosocial and behavioral characteristics. American Journal on Addictions, 17, 28-35.
63.
Shaffer, D.K. ( 2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 09A (AAT No. 3231113)
64.
Shaffer, D.K., Hartman, J.L., & Listwan, S.J. ( 2009). Drug abusing women in the community: The impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues , 4, 1045-1069.
65.
Shaffer, D.K., Listwan, S.J., Latessa, E.J., & Lowenkamp, C.T. (2008). The drug court phenomenon: Findings from Ohio. National Drug Court Institute Review, 6, 33-66.
66.
Simourd, D. ( 2004). Use of dynamic risk/need assessment instruments among long-term incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 24, 52-70.
67.
Stoops, W.W., Tindall, M.S., Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., & Leukefeld, C. ( 2005). Methamphetamine use in non-urban and urban drug court clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 260-276.
68.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. ( 2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-34, DHHS Publication No. SMA08-4343). Rockville, MD: Author.
69.
Taxman, F.S., & Bouffard, J. ( 2003). Drug treatment in the community: A case study of system integration issues. Federal Probation, 67, 4-14.
70.
Tyner, E.A., & Fremouw, W.J. ( 2008). The relation of methamphetamine use and violence: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 285-297.
71.
U.S. General Accountability Office. (2005). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes. Washington, DC: Author.
72.
Vito, G., & Tewksbury, R.A. (1998). The impact of treatment: The Jefferson County (Kentucky) drug court program. Federal Probation, 62, 46-52.
73.
Wagner, F.A., & Anthony, J.C. ( 2007). Male-female differences in the risk of progression from first use to dependence upon cannabis, cocaine, and alcohol. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86, 191-198.
74.
Weisheit, R.A., & Fuller, J. ( 2004). Methamphetamines in the heartland: A review and initial exploration. Journal of Crime and Justice, 27, 131-151.
75.
Wilson, D.B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D.L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459-487.
76.
Wolfe, E., Guydish, J., & Termondt, J. ( 2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 1155-1172.
77.
Yeh, B.T., & Doyle, C. ( 2005). USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005: A brief look. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service (RS22348).
