This study examines how registered sex offenders (RSOs) experience, respond to, and attribute stress regarding sex offender registration and notification process and policies. In addition, the frequency and reasons for Internet access is assessed, with a focus on how new legislation in New Jersey (P.L. 2007, C.219) limits or blocks such access. Drawing on survey data from a random sample of 1,000 RSOs in New Jersey, responses from 107 RSOs show significant levels of stress, significant losses due to restrictions on Internet access, and coping methods associated with higher and lower stress levels. The most significant loss reported by the sample related to employment search difficulties. Factors associated with increased levels of stress include using self-distraction for coping and not accepting the situation. Surprisingly, being forced to move because of financial reasons is associated with lower levels of stress.
Barnes, J., Dukes, T., Tewksbury, R., & De Troye, T. (in press). Predicting the impact of a statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review.
2.
Brannon, Y.N., Levenson, J.S., Fortney, T., & Baker, J.N. ( 2007). Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 19, 369-380.
3.
Burchfield, K.T., & W. Mingus. (2008). Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders’ experiences with local social capital and social control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 356-374.
4.
Carver, C. ( 1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92-100.
5.
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.
6.
Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress is a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31-68). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
7.
Colorado Department of Public Safety. (2004 ). Report on safety issues raised by living arrangements for and location of sex offenders in the community. Denver, CO: Sex Offender Management Board.
8.
Cortoni, F., & Marshall, W.L. (2001). Sex as a coping strategy and its relationship to juvenile sexual history and intimacy in sexual offenders . Sexual Abuse: An International Journal of Research and Treatment , 13, 27-43.
9.
Duwe, G., & Donnay, W. ( 2008). The impact of Megan’s Law on sex offender recidivism: The Minnesota experience. Criminology, 46(2), 411-446.
10.
Duwe, G., Donnay, W., & Tewksbury, R. ( 2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 484-504.
11.
Fox, R.J., Crask, M.R., & Kim, J. ( 1988). Mail survey response rate. A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly , 52, 467-491.
12.
Griffith, C.T. ( 1999). A study of stress and cognitive distortions in adolescent male offenders and non-offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Walden University.
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1996). Predictors of sexual offender recidivism: A meta-analysis (No. 1996-04). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
14.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J. ( 1998). Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
16.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J. ( 2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 13(2), 105-122.
17.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services.
18.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (No1999-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada .
19.
Heberlein, T.A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature . American Sociological Review, 43(4), 447-462.
20.
Hewitt, P.L., Flett, G.L., & Mosher, S.W. ( 1992). The Perceived Stress Scale: Factor structure and relation to depression symptoms in a psychiatric sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14(3), 247-257.
21.
Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. ( 2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly , 17(1), 61-88.
22.
Larson, P., & Poist, R. ( 2004). Improving response rates to mail surveys: A research note. Transportation Journal, 43(4), 67-74.
23.
Levenson, J.S. ( 2008). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions . Criminal Justice Studies, 21(2), 153-166.
24.
Levenson, J.S., Brannon, Y.N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. ( 2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 1-25.
25.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. ( 2006a). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49-66.
26.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. ( 2006b). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.
27.
Levenson, J.S., D’Amora, D.A., & Hern, A.L. ( 2007). Megan’s Law and its impact on community reentry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 1-16.
28.
Levenson, J.S., & Hern, A. ( 2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry. Justice Research and Policy, 9(2), 1-16.
29.
Levenson, J.S., Zgoba, K., & Tewksbury, R. ( 2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Sensible crime policy or flawed logic? Federal Probation, 71(3), 2-9.
30.
Mercado, C.C., Alvarez, S., & Levenson, J.S. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community re-entry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 20, 188-205.
31.
Mustaine, E.E., & Tewksbury, R. ( 2008). Registered sex offenders, residence, and the influence of race. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6(1), 65-82.
32.
Mustaine, E.E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K.M. ( 2006a). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 329-350.
33.
Mustaine, E.E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K.M. ( 2006b). Residential location and mobility of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(2), 177-192.
34.
Rand, M., & Catalano, S. ( 2007). Criminal victimization, 2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
35.
Sack, W.H., & Mason, R. ( 1980). Child abuse and conviction of sexual crimes: A preliminary finding. Law and Human Behavior, 4(3), 211-215.
36.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2002). Validity and utility of the Kentucky sex offender registry . Federal Probation, 66(1), 21-26.
37.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders . Federal Probation, 68(3), 30-33.
38.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67-81.
39.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2006). Sex offender registries as a tool for public safety: Views from registered offenders. Western Criminology Review , 7(1), 1-8.
40.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2007). Exile at home: The unintended collateral consequences of sex offender residency restrictions. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 42(2), 531-540.
41.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. ( 2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum , 26(3), 309-334.
42.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. ( 2007). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime & Delinquency, 53(3), 380-407.
43.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E.E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 61-75.
44.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E.E. (2007). Collateral consequences and community re-entry for registered sex offenders with child victims: Are the challenges even greater? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation , 46(1/2), 113-131.
45.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E.E. (in press). Stress and collateral consequences for registered sex offenders. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy.
46.
Uggen, C., Manza, J., & Behrens, A. ( 2004). Less than the average citizen: Stigma, role transition and civic reintegration of convicted felons. In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 261-293). Devon, UK: Willan.
47.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2007). Crime in the United States, 2006. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation.
48.
Vandiver, D.M., & Walker, J.T. ( 2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. Criminal Justice Review, 27(2), 284-300.
49.
Veysey, B., Zgoba, K., & Dalessandro, M. (in press). A preliminary step towards evaluating the impact of Megan’s Law: A trend analysis of sexual offenses in New Jersey from 1985 to 2005. Criminal Justice Policy Review.
50.
Welchans, S. ( 2005). Megan’s Law: Evaluations of sexual offender registries . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(2), 123-140.
51.
Zandbergen, P.A., & Hart, T.C. ( 2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of residency restriction laws using GIS. Justice Research and Policy, 8(2), 1-24.
52.
Zevitz, R.G., & Farkas, M.A. ( 2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 375-391.
53.
Zgoba, K., & Levenson, J.S. (2008). Variations in the recidivism of treated and nontreated sexual offenders in New Jersey: An examination of three time frames. Victims and Offenders: Journal of Evidence-Based Policies and Practices, 3(1), 10-30.
54.
Zgoba, K., Levenson, J.S., & McKee, T. (in press). Examining the impact of sex offender residence restrictions on housing availability. Criminal Justice Policy Review.
