This study examines the relationship between recidivism rates, therapeutic climate, and composition of offenders in group-based cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for sexual offenders. The Group Environment Scale (GES) is employed to measure social climate. The GES is administered to 73 male sexual offenders in groups of those who only victimized adults or children (five groups) or men who both victimized adults and those who victimized children (five groups). Group environment is not found to differ significantly as a function of group composition. Group member's ratings on the GES are in the medium to high range, indicating a generally positive group environment. Although the group environment overall does not differ between groups, groups do differ significantly in terms of expressiveness. There are no differences in recidivism rates between groups as a function of group composition. The results are discussed in the light of mixing child molesters and rapists in group-based CBT.
Allam, J., Middleton, D., & Browne, K. (1997). Different clients, different needs? Practice issues in community-based treatment for sex offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 7, 69-84.
2.
Barratt, M., Wilson, R.J., & Long, C. (2003). Measuring motivation to change in sexual offenders from institutional intake to community treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 269-283.
3.
Beech, A.R., & Fisher, D.D. (2002). The rehabilitation of child sex offenders. Australian Psychologist, 37, 206-214.
4.
Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R. (1999). STEP 3: An evaluation of the Prison Sex Offender Treatment Programme. Home Office Occasional Report. London : Her Majesty's Stationary Office. Available at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/occ-step3.pdf
5.
Beech, A., & Fordham, A.S. (1997). Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 9, 219-237.
6.
Beech, A.R., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C.E. (2005). Relationship between therapeutic climate and treatment outcome in a group-based sexual offender program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 17, 127.
7.
Beech, A., Oliver, C., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R.C. (2005). STEP 4: The Sex Offender Treatment Programme in prison: Addressing the needs of rapists and sexual murderers. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from www.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/assets/documents/100013DBStep_4_SOTP_report_2005.pdf
8.
Blumenthal, S., Gudjonsson, G., & Burns, J. (1999). Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex offenders against adults and children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 129-143.
9.
Clark, P., & Erooga, M. (1994). Groupwork with men who sexually abuse children . In T. Morrison, M. Erooga, & R. C. Beckett (Eds.), Sexual offenders against children: Practice, management and policy (pp. 102-128). London: Routledge .
10.
Cowburn, M. (1990). Work with male sex offenders in groups. Groupwork, 3, 156-171.
11.
Evans, N., & Jarvis, P. (1986). The Group Attitude Scale: A measure of attraction to groups. Small Group Behavior, 17, 203-216.
12.
Gallagher, C.A., Wilson, D.B., Hirschfield, P., Coggeshall, M.B., & McKenzie, D.L. (1999). A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual offending. CorrectionsManagement Quarterly, 3, 19-29.
13.
Garratt, T., Oliver, C., Wilcox, D.T., & Middleton, D. (2003). Who cares? The views of sex offenders about the group treatment they receive. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 323-338.
14.
Hall, G.C.N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802-809.
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
16.
Hanson, R.K., Gordon, A., Harris, A.J.R., Marques, J.K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V.L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
17.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumière, M.L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
18.
Hayashino, D.S., Wurtele, S.K., & Klebe, K.J. (1995). Child molesters: An examination of cognitive factors . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 106-116.
19.
Hudson, S.M., & Ward, T. (1997). Intimacy, loneliness, and attachment style in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 323-339.
20.
Krupnick, J.L., Stotsky, S.M., Simmens, S., Moyer, J., Elkin, I., Watkins, J., et al. (1996). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 532-539.
21.
Littlepage, G.E., Cowert, L., & Kerr, B. (1989). Relationships between group environment scales group performance and cohesion. Small Group Research, 20, 50-61.
22.
Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology , 1, 117-146.
23.
MacKenzie, H.R., & Livesley, W.J. (1986). Outcome and process measures in brief group psychotherapy. Psychiatric Annals, 16, 715-720.
24.
Marques, J.K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D.M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from Claifornia's Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Program (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107.
25.
Marshall, W.L. (2005). Therapist style in sexual offender treatment: Influence on indices of change. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 109-116.
26.
Marshall, W.L., Fernandez, Y.M., Serran, G.A., Mulloy, R., Thornton, D., Mann, R.E., et al. (2003). Process variables in the treatment of sexual offenders: A review of the relevant literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 205-234.
27.
Marshall, W.L., Jones, R., Ward, T., Johnston, P., & Barbaree, H.E. (1991). Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 465-485.
28.
Marshall, W.L., & Serran, G.A. (2004). The role of the therapist in offender treatment. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 309-320.
29.
Marshall, W.L., Serran, G.A., Fernandez, Y.M., Mulloy, R., Mann, R., & Thornton, D. (2003). Therapists characteristics in the treatment of sexual offenders: Tentative data on their relationship with indices of behaviour change. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 9, 25-30.
Morgan, R.D., Ferrell, S.W., & Winterowd, C.L. (1999). Therapist perceptions of important therapeutic factors in psychotherapy groups for male inmates in state correctional facilities. Small Group Research, 30, 712-729.
32.
Morgan, R.D., Garland, J.T., Rozycki, A.T., Reich, D.A., & Wilson, S. (2005). Group therapy goals: A comparison of group therapy providers and male inmates. TheJournal for Specialists in Group Work, 30, 159-172.
33.
Pithers, W.D., & Cumming, G.F. (1989). Can relapses be prevented? Initial outcome data from the Vermont Treatment Program for Sexual Aggressors. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 313-325). New York: Guilford .
34.
Polizzi, D.M., MacKenzie, D.L., & Hickman, L.J. (1999). What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison and non-prison based treatment programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 357-374.
35.
Rose, G., & Bednar, R. (1980). Effects of positive and negative self-disclosure and feedback on early group development. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 63-70.
36.
Salter, A.C. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and victims: A practical guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Sawyer, S. (2000). Some thoughts about why we believe group therapy is the preferred modality for treating sex offenders. ATSA Forum, 12, 11-12.
38.
Serran, G., Fernandez, Y., Marshall, W.L., & Mann, R.E. (2003). Process issues in treatment: Application to sexual offender programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 34, 368-374.
39.
Shadish, W.R. (1984). Intimate behaviour and the assessment of benefits in clinical groups. Small Group Behavior, 15, 204-221.
40.
Stephenson, M. (1991). A summary of an evaluation of the community sex offender program in the Pacific region. Forum on Corrections Research, 3, 25-30.
41.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon .
42.
Taft, C.T., Murphy, C.M., King, D.W., Musser, P.H., & DeDeyn, J.M. (2003). Process and treatment adherence factors in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 812-820.
43.
Whitaker, D.L., & Wodarski, J.S. (1989). Treatment of sexual offenders in a community mental health center. Journal of Social Work & Human Sexuality, 7, 49-68.
44.
Yalom, I.D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
