Aspeln, C. H., Gaffney, M. J., Hurst, L. H., Johnson, C. L., Lovrich, N. P., Pratt, T. C., et al. (2003). National DNA study report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
2.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2002). Crime in the United States, 2002. Crime index offenses cleared. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_02/html/web/offcleared/03-NC.html
3.
Jensen, P. F. (2003). Frye versus Daubert: Practically the same?Minnesota Law Review, 87-87. Retrieved June 8, 2006, from http://www.law.umn.edu/lawreview/v87n5.htm
4.
Neufeld, P., & Scheck, B. C. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Commentary. Crime Magazine: An Encyclopedia of Crime. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www.crimemagazine.com/dna.htm
5.
O'Hara, G. E., & O'Hara, G. L. (2003). Fundamentals of criminal investigation (7th ed.) Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
6.
Reinstein, R. S. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Commentary. Crime Magazine: An Encyclopedia of Crime. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www.crimemagazine.com/dna.htm
7.
Ridley, M. (2006). Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. New York: Harper Perennial.
8.
Slovenko, R. (2000). Commentary: From Frye to Daubert and beyond. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 28, 411-444.
9.
Wallace, K. (2002). Old cases, DNA evidence help to solve mystery of nightstalker cases. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://www.wral.com/print/1470009/detail.htmlP
