This article discusses misconceptions in Bennell, Jones, Taylor, and Snook’s (2006) critique of Kocsis (2003a) concerning the validities and abilities surrounding criminal profiling. It also, in part, serves to canvass the approach of investigative psychology and what may be viewed as an imperative for some of its proponents to challenge evidence into the validity of criminal profiling, which is not easily reconcilable with that ideology.
Arrigo, B. A., & Shipley, S. L. (2005). Introduction to forensic psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier Academic Press.
2.
Bennell, C., Jones, N., Taylor, P., & Snook, B. (2006). Validities and abilities in criminal profiling: A critique of the studies conducted by Richard Kocsis and his colleagues. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(3), 344-360.
3.
Boon, J. C. W. (1997). The contribution of personality theories to psychological profiling. In J. L. Jackson & D. B. Berkerian (Eds.), Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 43-59). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
4.
Britton, P. (1997). The jigsaw man. London: Bantam.
5.
Canter, D. V. (1994). Criminal shadows. London: HarperCollins.
6.
Canter, D. V., & Heritage, R. (1989). A multivariate model of sexual offence behaviour: Developments in offender profiling. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185-212.
7.
Devore, J., & Peck, R. (2005). Statistics: The exploration and analysis of data. Sydney, Australia: Thomson.
8.
Douglas, J. E., & Burgess, A. E. (1986). Criminal profiling: A viable investigative tool against violent crime. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 55(12), 9-13.
9.
Geberth, V. J. (1996). Practical homicide investigation: Tactics, procedures and forensic techniques (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
10.
Hazelwood, R. R., Ressler, R. K., Depue, R. L., & Douglas, J. E. (1995). Criminal personality profiling: An overview. In R. R. Hazelwood & A. W. Burgess (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach (2nd ed., pp. 115-126). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
11.
Kocsis, R. N. (2003a). Criminal psychological profiling: Validities and abilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(2), 126-144.
12.
Kocsis, R. N. (2003b). An empirical assessment of content in criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(1), 38-47.
13.
Kocsis, R. N. (2004). Psychological profiling of serial arson offenses: An assessment of skills and accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(3), 341-361.
14.
Kocsis, R. N. (2006). Criminal profiling: Principles and practice. Tottowa, NJ: Humana Press.
15.
Kocsis, R. N., & Coleman, S. (2000). The unexplored ethics of criminal personality profiling. In M. G. Godwin (Ed.), Criminal psychology and forensic technology: A collaborative approach to effective profiling (pp. 323-338). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
16.
Kocsis, R. N., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). Believing is seeing? Investigating the perceived accuracy of criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 149-160.
17.
Kocsis, R. N., Hayes, A. F., & Irwin, H. J. (2002). Investigative experience and accuracy in psychological profiling a violent crime. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 811-823.
18.
Kocsis, R. N., & Heller, G. Z. (2004). Believing is seeing—II. Beliefs and perceptions of criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(3), 313-329.
19.
Kocsis, R. N., Heller, G. Z., & Try, A. (2003). Visual vs. narrative case material: Their impact on criminal psychological profiling?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(6), 664-676.
20.
Kocsis, R. N., Irwin, H. J., Hayes, A. F., & Nunn, R. (2000). Expertise in psychological profiling: A comparative assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(3), 311-331.
21.
Kocsis, R. N., & Middledorp, J. T. (2004). Believing is seeing—III. Perceptions of content in criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(4), 477-494.
22.
Kocsis, R. N., Middledorp, J. T., & Try, A. C. (2005). Cognitive processes in criminal profile construction: A preliminary study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(6), 662-681.
23.
Kocsis, R. N., & Palermo, G. B. (2005). Ten major problems with criminal profiling. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 26(2), 1-26.
24.
Palermo, G. B., & Kocsis, R. N. (2005). Offender profiling: An introduction to the sociopsychological analysis of violent crime. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
25.
Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling: An outcome and process study. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 215-233.
26.
Skeem, J. L., & Golding, S. L. (1998). Community examiners’ evaluations of competence to stand trial: Common problems and suggestions for improvement. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 357-367.
27.
Wild, C. J. (2000). Chance encounters. New York: John Wiley.
