The present study examined the risks and needs of status offenders in comparison to an at-large juvenile court sample, with specific attention paid to factors related to gender and ethnicity. Status offenders displayed significantly higher risk scores than the comparison sample in domains associated with both family and parenting concerns and educational concerns. In addition, females displayed higher risk levels than males and White youth displayed significantly higher risk levels than minority youth across a wide variety of risk domains. Further analyses were conducted regarding the participation of African American males and females in a program designed as an alternative to detention. For both groups, successful program completion was accompanied by little or no further court involvement, whereas failure to complete the program was related to a variety of negative outcomes. However, African American females and males successfully completing programrequirements displayed different risks and needs at the outset of their participation.
Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Okamoto, S. (2001). Gender matters: Patterns in girl's delinquency and gender responsive programming. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1, 1-28.
4.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (1998). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
DeJong, C., & Jackson, K. C. (1998). Putting race into context: Race, juvenile justice processing, and urbanization. Justice Quarterly, 15, 487-504.
6.
Dornfield, M., & Kruttschnitt, C. (1992). Do the stereotypes fit? Mapping gender-specific outcomes and risk factors. Criminology, 30, 397-419.
7.
Empey, L. (1978). American delinquency. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
8.
Federle, K. (2000). The institutionalization of female delinquency. Buffalo Law Review, 48, 881-895.
9.
Funk, S. J. (1999). Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice& Behavior, 26, 44-68.
10.
Gavazzi, S. M., & Lim, J. Y. (2003). Advances in measurement of global risk indicators in lives of court-involved youth: Brief evidence for concurrent validity. Psychological Reports, 93, 750-752.
11.
Gavazzi, S. M., Lim, J. Y., Yarcheck, C. M., & Eyre, E. L. (2003). A brief report regarding predictive validity evidence of global risk indicators in the lives of court-involved youth. Psychological Reports, 93, 1239-1242.
12.
Gavazzi, S. M., Novak, M., Yarcheck, C. M., & DiStefano, L. T. (2004, February). Assessing and tracking youthful offenders with the web-based global risk assessment device. Corrections Today, pp. 64-67.
13.
Gavazzi, S. M., Slade, D., Buettner, C. K., Partridge, C., Yarcheck, C. M., & Andrews, D. W. (2003). Toward conceptual development and empirical measurement of global risk indicators in the lives of court-involved youth. Psychological Reports, 92, 599-615.
14.
Gavazzi, S. M., Wasserman, D., Partridge, C.,& Sheridan, S. (2000). The Growing Up FAST diversion program: An example of juvenile justice program development for outcome evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 159-175.
15.
Gavazzi, S. M., Yarcheck, C. M., Rhine, E. E.,& Partridge, C. (2003). Building bridges between parole officers and the families of serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 291-308.
16.
Gavazzi, S. M., Yarcheck, C., Wasserman, D., & Partridge, C. (2000). A balanced and restorative approach to juvenile crime: Programming for families of adolescent offenders. In G. L. Fox & M. L. Benson (Eds.), Contemporary issues in family research series(pp. 381-405). Stamford, CT: JAI.
17.
Grisso, T., & Barnum, R. (2001). The Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument: Second version (MAYSI-2). Worcester: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
18.
Heilbrun, K., Brock, W., Waite, D., Lanier, A., Schmid, M., Witte, G., et al. (2000). Risk factors for juvenile criminal recidivism: The post-release adjustment of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 275-291.
19.
Herz, D. C. (2001). Understanding the use of mental health placements by the juvenile justice system. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 9, 172-181.
20.
Hurst, H. (2003, Winter). Status offenders: Where have they gone and who cares?Juvenile and Family Justice Today, pp. 1-5.
Klein, M. W. (1974). Labeling, deterrence, and recidivism: A study of police dispositions of juvenile offenders. Social Problems, 22, 292-303.
23.
Lahey, B. B., Goodman, S. H., Canino, G., Bird, H., Schwab-Stone, M., Waldon, I. D., et al. (2000). Age and gender differences in oppositional behavior and conduct problems: A cross-sectional household study of middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 488-503.
24.
Leiber, M. J. (1994). Acomparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Americans, African-Americans, and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11, 357-379.
25.
Maxon, C. L., & Klein, M. W. (1997). Responding to troubled youth. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Mazerolle, P. (1998). Gender, strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65-91.
27.
Partridge, C., Gavazzi, S. M., & Rhine, E. E. (2001). Working with the families of serious juvenile offenders: The Growing Up FASTparole program. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23, 403-418.
28.
Peterson, R. D., Krivo, L. J., & Harris, M. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood crime: Do local institutions matter?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 31-63.
29.
Shields, I. W., & Simourd, D. J. (1991). Predicting predatory behavior in a population of incarcerated young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 180-194.
30.
Sickmund, M. (2000). Offenders in juvenile court, 1997. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
31.
Steinhart, D. J. (1996). Status offenses. Juvenile Court, 6, 86-99.
